Epomaker Hack 59 vs Luma4060% or 40%?
Choose the Hack 59 for a conventional 60% ANSI layout and larger battery, or the Luma40 for an aluminum, low-profile ortholinear build.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.7 · 18 reviews
from$48at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Hack 59
Battery
Build quality in the top 10% of 60% boards under $50.
- 60% ANSI layout with 59 keys.
- 3000mAh battery and wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity.
- Gasket mount with five named dampening layers: Poron sandwich foam, IXPE switch pad, sound enhancement pad, Poron switch socket pad, and bottom silicone pad.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- CNC-cut aluminum case with a PC plate and cushioned tray-mount design.
- 40% ortholinear layout with low-profile switches and keycaps.
- Wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity, with a listed 1450mAh battery.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Pick the Hack 59 if you want a more familiar 60% ANSI keyboard, PBT keycaps, and a 3000mAh battery. Choose the Luma40 if a lighter, CNC aluminum board and a 40% ortholinear low-profile layout are more important. Before buying the Luma40, make sure you are comfortable with its ortholinear layout and low-profile-only switch and keycap compatibility.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Hack 59
Epomaker Luma40
Layout size
60%
40%
Battery
3,000 mAh
1,450 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
No
Yes
Ergonomics
Standard
Ortholinear
Case material
ABS
Aluminum
- Epomaker Hack 59
- Epomaker Luma40
- Performance
- 6474
- Build quality
- 8181
- Productivity
- 8188
- Customizability
- 8985
- Portability
- 8785
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- QMK
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Hack 59 is the more straightforward gaming choice if you want a familiar compact ANSI layout, while the listed polling rates are even. Office and travel lean toward the Luma40 for its low-profile ortholinear design, aluminum case, and lower weight. Programming and modding are preference calls because both offer QMK/VIA and hot-swap support, though their layouts and switch compatibility differ. The Luma40 also stands out for a distinctive compact setup, while the Hack 59 favors familiar key placement.
Pick the Epomaker Hack 59
- The Hack 59's 60% ANSI layout is less of a departure from a conventional keyboard than the Luma40's 40% ortholinear layout.
- Both list 1000 Hz polling over wired and 2.4 GHz connections, so the listed polling rate does not separate them.
- The Hack 59 has linear switches, while the Luma40's listed switch options include clicky and linear.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Hack 59
18 owner reviews
“This keyboard sounds great and has amazing performance! One of the best ive ever used”
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker Hack 59 vs Luma40 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
15 of 25 specs differ
Epomaker Hack 59
Epomaker Luma40
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Hack 59 vs Luma40: your questions
The Hack 59 is a 60% ANSI keyboard with PBT keycaps and gasket mounting. The Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard with low-profile switches and a CNC aluminum case.
The Hack 59 may be easier to adapt to if you prefer a conventional 60% ANSI layout. Both list 1000 Hz polling for wired and 2.4 GHz modes, and the Luma40 adds N-Key Rollover.
Both support Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired connectivity. The Hack 59 has a 3000mAh battery, while the Luma40 has a 1450mAh battery.
The Luma40 weighs 410g, while the Hack 59 weighs 630g. Their listed dimensions also differ, with the Luma40 measuring 240 x 87 x 21 mm and the Hack 59 28 x 119 x 303 mm.
No, the Luma40 requires low-profile switches and keycaps, and its compatibility rules specify that standard MX keycaps will not fit. The Hack 59 has PBT keycaps and its own south-facing LED clearance considerations.
Yes, both list QMK and VIA support. Both are also hot-swappable, but the Hack 59 supports 3- and 5-pin mechanical switches while the Luma40 uses Kailh low-profile switches.
The Hack 59 has a 3000mAh battery, compared with 1450mAh in the Luma40. The Luma40 vendor description also lists battery life of up to 75 hours with RGB off and 7 hours with RGB on.
Yes, its vendor description names five layers: Poron sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad, a sound enhancement pad, a Poron switch socket pad, and a bottom silicone pad. It also uses a gasket mount.
The Luma40 has a CNC-cut aluminum case, a PC plate, and a tray-mount structure. Its vendor description says foam layers and the cushioned tray mount dampen vibration.
Yes, both have per-key RGB. The Hack 59 uses south-facing LEDs, while the Luma40 uses north-facing LEDs and has a compatibility caution for Cherry-profile keycaps.
The Hack 59 uses a 60% ANSI layout, while the Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard. Both omit a function row, dedicated arrow keys, and a numpad.
The Luma40's listed keycaps are low-profile PC, and the vendor description identifies Kailh low-profile switches. The product description also lists three extra switches among its included items.
Not sold on either?
![[In Stock] Lucky65 V2 65% Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/20250324144508.jpg?v=1742798796&width=3840&quality=75)
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.