Epomaker Hack 59 vs RT75Compactness or 75% layout
Choose the Hack 59 for a lighter, smaller board with QMK/VIA support, or the RT75 for a 75% layout and detachable TFT screen.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.7 · 18 reviews
from$48at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
5.0 · 1 reviews
from$91at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Hack 59
Build quality in the top 10% of 60% boards under $50.
- 60% ANSI layout with 59 keys, weighing 630g.
- QMK and VIA support for key customization.
- Tri-mode connectivity: wired, 2.4 GHz and Bluetooth.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker RT75
Battery
Build quality in the top 50% of 75% boards under $100.
- 75% layout with 83 keys, or a screen module in place of four keys.
- Detachable TFT screen supports GIFs, images, a clock or system information, according to Epomaker.
- 5000mAh battery and wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No numpad.
Pick the Hack 59 if a lighter 60% board and explicit QMK/VIA support are more important than dedicated navigation keys. Choose the RT75 if you want a 75% layout and the detachable TFT screen, and are comfortable with its greater weight. Both provide hot-swap switches and three connection modes, so those features do not decide the comparison.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Hack 59
Epomaker RT75
Layout size
60%
75%
Battery
3,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Switch options
Linear
Linear, Silent, Tactile
Display
None
TFT
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
630 g
1,165 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- Epomaker Hack 59
- Epomaker RT75
- Performance
- 6461
- Build quality
- 8166
- Productivity
- 8176
- Customizability
- 8966
- Portability
- 8780
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: ABS
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The RT75 suits office and content-creation setups that benefit from more keys and a configurable display. The Hack 59 is the more compelling travel and firmware-customization pick, with a lower listed weight and explicit QMK/VIA support. Gaming is a close call: both share a 1000 Hz polling rate and three connection modes, so layout preference matters more than the listed headline specs. For programming, the Hack 59 has the clearer customization advantage, while the RT75 offers a larger layout.
It's a tie
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity.
- The Hack 59 is 60% and weighs 630g, while the RT75 is 75% and weighs 1165g, leaving the choice to desk space and preferred layout.
- Both have hot-swap sockets and gasket mounts.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Hack 59
18 owner reviews
“This keyboard sounds great and has amazing performance! One of the best ive ever used”
Epomaker RT75
1 owner reviews
“I've been using the Epomaker RT75 for a couple of weeks now as my main keyboard for both productivity and gaming. I got it mainly for its retro design and out of curiosity about the 1.54-inch smart screen, which looks impressive. At first, I thought I'd get…”
Epomaker Hack 59 vs RT75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 23 specs differ
Epomaker Hack 59
Epomaker RT75
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Hack 59 vs RT75: your questions
The Hack 59 is a 60% keyboard with 59 keys and QMK/VIA support. The RT75 is a 75% board with 83 keys, or a detachable TFT screen in place of four keys.
Yes, the RT75 has a detachable TFT screen. Epomaker says it can show GIFs, images, a clock or system information, and can be swapped for four keys.
The Hack 59 weighs 630g, while the RT75 weighs 1165g. The Hack 59 is the lighter option for buyers prioritizing a lower listed weight.
Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz connections, as well as wired use. The Hack 59 vendor description specifies Bluetooth 5.0, while the RT75 listing identifies Bluetooth without a version.
The RT75 has a listed 5000mAh battery, compared with 3000mAh in the Hack 59. These capacities alone do not establish actual battery life.
The RT75 product details identify hot-swapping and onboard memory, but do not specify QMK or VIA support. The Hack 59 explicitly lists both QMK and VIA support.
Yes, both are listed as hot-swappable. The Hack 59 vendor specifies support for 3- and 5-pin mechanical switches, while the RT75 description says its switches can be swapped without soldering.
The Hack 59 has the clearer advantage for users who want custom key layouts, because it explicitly supports QMK and VIA. The RT75's 75% layout has more keys than the Hack 59's 60% layout, which some users may prefer.
Yes, Epomaker says the detachable screen module can be exchanged for four extra keys. This gives buyers a choice between the display and those keys.
Both are listed with south-facing RGB. The compatibility notes say shine-through legends stay dark and some sculpted keycaps may clip the LEDs.
Neither has a numpad. The Hack 59 compatibility notes also identify its compact layout as lacking a function row and dedicated arrow keys.
Epomaker describes five layers in the Hack 59, including Poron sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad and a bottom silicone pad. The RT75 is described with six layers, including PORON foam, PET, acoustic foam and bottom silicone.
Not sold on either?
![[In Stock] Lucky65 V2 65% Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/20250324144508.jpg?v=1742798796&width=3840&quality=75)
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.