Epomaker LUMA100 vs Luma4096% or 40% Layout
Choose the LUMA100 for a familiar layout with a numpad, or the Luma40 for a smaller ortholinear board with QMK support.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 · 5 reviews
from$95at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker LUMA100
Battery
Build quality in the top 25% of 96% boards under $100.
- 96% ANSI layout includes a numpad, navigation cluster, and arrow keys.
- Gasket mount with a polycarbonate plate and five named sound-dampening layers.
- Tri-mode connectivity with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired USB-C.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- Compact 40% ortholinear layout in a 240 x 87 mm, 410g aluminum case.
- Supports QMK and VIA, with hot-swappable low-profile switches.
- Tri-mode connectivity, per-key RGB, and N-Key Rollover.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Pick the LUMA100 if you want a low-profile wireless keyboard that retains a numpad, navigation cluster, and arrows. Choose the Luma40 if a smaller, lighter ortholinear layout and QMK support matter more than dedicated keys. Both are hot-swappable, but each requires low-profile switches and keycaps.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker LUMA100
Epomaker Luma40
Layout size
96%
40%
Battery
3,000 mAh
1,450 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Ergonomics
Standard
Ortholinear
Mount style
Gasket Mount
Tray Mount
Weight
620 g
410 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- Epomaker LUMA100
- Epomaker Luma40
- Performance
- 6674
- Build quality
- 7781
- Productivity
- 8288
- Customizability
- 7385
- Portability
- 5485
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Low profile
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: Aluminum
- VIA
What will you mostly use it for?
The LUMA100 suits buyers who want a conventional typing layout, particularly for office use and workflows that benefit from a numpad. The Luma40 is the clear fit for portability and offers the more explicitly extensible firmware options with QMK and VIA. Gaming is a closer call: the LUMA100 provides a familiar set of keys, while the Luma40 lists N-Key Rollover. Both support three connection modes and low-profile switch swapping.
Pick the Epomaker LUMA100
- The LUMA100's 96% layout includes a numpad and keeps the gaps of a full-size board, making it the more familiar option for games that use many keys.
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, while the Luma40 additionally specifies N-Key Rollover.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker LUMA100
5 owner reviews
“great keyboard. the O wasn’t working initially but i just swapped it out with the extras in the set. love the feel and customization of it”
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker LUMA100 vs Luma40 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 24 specs differ
Epomaker LUMA100
Epomaker Luma40
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker LUMA100 vs Luma40: your questions
The LUMA100 is a 96% ANSI keyboard with a numpad, navigation cluster, and arrow keys. The Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard without a dedicated function row, arrows, or numpad.
No. Its 40% layout does not include a numpad, dedicated arrow keys, or a function row. The LUMA100 includes a numpad, navigation cluster, and arrows.
The Luma40 is the lighter, smaller option at 410g and 240 x 87 mm. The LUMA100 weighs 620g and measures 371 x 129 mm.
Yes. Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired USB connectivity. The LUMA100 has a 3000mAh battery, while the Luma40 has a 1450mAh battery.
The Luma40 lists both QMK and VIA support. The LUMA100 lists VIA support, but not QMK.
Both keyboards are listed as hot-swappable and use low-profile switch sockets. The LUMA100 vendor description specifies compatibility with certain 3-pin and 5-pin low-profile mechanical switches, while the Luma40 vendor description specifies Kailh low-profile mechanical switches.
No. Both keyboards require low-profile switches and keycaps, and standard MX keycaps will not fit. Their north-facing LEDs may also interfere with Cherry-profile keycaps.
The Luma40 is a strong fit for users who want an ortholinear grid and QMK support; its vendor description says the layout is designed to reduce finger travel. Its 40% layout lacks dedicated arrows and a function row, while the LUMA100 includes those keys along with a numpad.
Both have per-key, north-facing RGB lighting. The LUMA100 vendor description also identifies dynamic lighting presets and software control, while the Luma40 description identifies customizable dynamic RGB.
The LUMA100 has a 3000mAh battery, compared with 1450mAh in the Luma40. The Luma40 vendor page lists up to 75 hours with RGB off and 7 hours with RGB on.
Both product specifications list Mac and Windows support. The LUMA100 vendor description also lists Linux support, while the Luma40 vendor description lists Android compatibility.
The LUMA100 uses a gasket mount with a polycarbonate plate. The Luma40 uses a tray mount and polycarbonate plate, with the vendor describing its typing feel as cushioned.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.