Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 11, 2026

Epomaker LUMA100 vs Lofree FlowNumpad or PBT

Choose the LUMA100 for its numpad, 2.4 GHz connection and VIA support, or the Lofree Flow for a smaller, lighter layout with PBT keycaps.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker LUMA100

Battery

Build quality in the top 20% of 96% boards under $100.

If you want

  • 96% ANSI layout with a numpad, arrow keys and navigation cluster.
  • Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz and wired connectivity, with a 3000mAh battery.
  • VIA support for key remapping and macros, as described by Epomaker.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
  • Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.

Get the

Lofree Flow

Build quality in the bottom 30% of 75% boards under $200.

If you want

  • 75% ANSI layout without a numpad, making it smaller than the LUMA100.
  • Listed weight of 568g, lower than the LUMA100's 620g.
  • PBT keycaps, with the vendor describing a dye-sublimated finish.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • No numpad.

Bottom line

Pick the Epomaker LUMA100 if you want a numpad, VIA customization or 2.4 GHz wireless, and prefer per-key RGB. Choose the Lofree Flow if carrying a smaller, lighter board matters more and you want PBT keycaps. Both are low-profile, gasket-mounted and hot-swappable, so the layout and feature differences should drive the decision.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker LUMA100

Lofree Flow

  • Layout size

    96%

    75%

  • Connection

    Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

    Bluetooth, Wired

    Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency

  • Battery

    3,000 mAh

    2,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Weight

    620 g

    568 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

  • VIA

    Yes

    No

    GUI remapping without compiling firmware

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker LUMA100
  • Lofree Flow
Performance
65
49
Build quality
77
57
Productivity
82
65
Customizability
73
60
Portability
54
82

What they share

  • Hot-swappable
  • Low profile
  • Case material: Aluminum
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The LUMA100 takes the edge for desk-based work, gaming and customization, thanks to its numpad, stated polling rate, extra wireless mode and VIA support. The Flow is the more travel-oriented option, with a smaller layout and lower listed weight. Both boards are hot-swappable, but the LUMA100 offers more explicitly described remapping features. Lighting preferences may also decide the comparison, since the LUMA100 has per-key RGB and the Flow lists white RGB.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker LUMA100

  • The LUMA100 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate, while no polling rate is listed for the Flow.
  • Its Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz and wired modes give more connection options than the Flow's Bluetooth and wired modes.

Full specs

Epomaker LUMA100 vs Lofree Flow specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

10 of 23 specs differ

Epomaker LUMA100

Lofree Flow

Typing & switches

Switch options

—
Linear, Tactile

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Low profile

Yes
Yes

Sound dampening

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

96%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

3,000 mAhBetter
2,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Aluminum

Plate material

Polycarbonate
—

Keycaps

ABS
PBT

Weight

620 g
568 g

Dimensions

26 x 371 x 129 mm
24 x 126 x 315 mm

Typing angle

—
4°

Backlight

RGB, north-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

VIA

Yes
No

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2026
2023

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

Lofree Flow3 stores

FAQ

Epomaker LUMA100 vs Lofree Flow: your questions

The LUMA100 has a 96% layout with a numpad. The Lofree Flow is listed as a 75% layout and its compatibility details specify that it has no numpad.

The Lofree Flow is listed at 568g, while the LUMA100 is listed at 620g. The Flow is also the smaller board by layout, at 75% compared with the LUMA100's 96%.

Yes, the LUMA100 supports Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz and wired USB-C connections. The Lofree Flow is listed with Bluetooth and wired connectivity, but not 2.4 GHz.

Yes, the Flow supports Bluetooth as well as wired USB-C. Its vendor description says Bluetooth can connect three devices at the same time and supports one-key switching.

Epomaker lists VIA support for the LUMA100, and its vendor description says VIA can remap keys and record macros. The Lofree Flow's listed features do not include VIA support.

Both keyboards are listed as hot-swappable. Epomaker specifies that the LUMA100 accepts certain 3-pin and 5-pin low-profile mechanical switches.

No, both keyboards require low-profile switches and keycaps, according to their compatibility rules. Standard MX keycaps will not fit either board.

The LUMA100 is listed with ABS keycaps, and Epomaker describes them as double-shot DSA low-profile keycaps. The Flow is listed with PBT keycaps, and its vendor description identifies a dye-sublimated finish.

The LUMA100 has per-key north-facing RGB, with dynamic presets and software controls described by Epomaker. The Flow is listed with white RGB, and its vendor description mentions keycap backlighting and bottom RGB ambient lighting.

The LUMA100 is the more clearly specified gaming choice because its listing gives a 1000 Hz polling rate and includes 2.4 GHz connectivity. The Flow's listing does not give a polling rate and lists Bluetooth and wired connections.

Yes, both are listed with gasket mounts. Epomaker describes the LUMA100's suspended plate and five sound-dampening layers, while the Flow vendor describes a gasket structure with IXPE and Poron sound-absorbing foam.

The LUMA100 is listed with a 3000mAh battery, compared with 2000mAh for the Lofree Flow. Battery capacity alone does not establish how long either keyboard will run between charges.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.