Epomaker Luma40 vs Magcore 87Wireless or 8000Hz
Choose the Luma40 for a compact wireless ortholinear board, or the Magcore 87 for a full TKL layout and wired gaming features including adjustable actuation and Rapid Trigger.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.8 · 64 reviews
from$109at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- Tri-mode connectivity: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz and wired.
- 410g aluminum 40% ortholinear design with low-profile construction.
- Supports both QMK and VIA, plus hot-swappable low-profile switches.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker Magcore 87
polling rate
- TKL ANSI layout with 88 keys and a conventional key arrangement.
- Wired 8000Hz polling rate, vendor-listed 0.125ms latency, adjustable actuation and Rapid Trigger.
- CNC aluminum case, gasket mount and layered sound dampening.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Choose the Luma40 if wireless operation, low weight, a 40% ortholinear layout or QMK support is central to your setup. Choose the Magcore 87 if you want a TKL layout and prioritize its wired 8000Hz polling, adjustable actuation and Rapid Trigger. Check the switch and keycap restrictions before planning either board around replacement parts.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker Magcore 87
Layout size
40%
85%
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Wired
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Low profile
Yes
No
Ergonomics
Ortholinear
Standard
Max polling rate
1,000 Hz
8,000 Hz
Higher polling helps competitive FPS and does nothing for typing
- Epomaker Luma40
- Epomaker Magcore 87
- Performance
- 7489
- Build quality
- 8181
- Productivity
- 8891
- Customizability
- 8578
- Portability
- 8553
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Aluminum
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Magcore 87 is the clearer fit for gaming features, while Luma40 suits travel and buyers who want wireless connectivity. Programming is a layout choice: Luma40 offers ortholinear keys and QMK, whereas Magcore 87 provides a more familiar TKL arrangement. Modding leans toward Luma40 for its QMK support, but both boards restrict switch swaps to their specific switch types. Content creators can choose between Luma40's wireless compact format and Magcore 87's TKL key layout and south-facing RGB.
Pick the Epomaker Magcore 87
- Magcore 87 offers adjustable actuation per key and Rapid Trigger, features aimed at responsive gaming inputs.
- Its wired connection supports an 8000Hz polling rate and vendor-listed 0.125ms latency.
- The Luma40 has a 1000Hz polling rate in 2.4 GHz or wired mode, and supports Bluetooth as another connection option.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker Magcore 87
64 owner reviews
“Just got my hand on this beast gaming keyboard and trust me.. its the most solid keyboard out there with its inductive switches it makes gaming next level.”
“The keyboard is excellent, and the build quality is great. But I have an issue with its weight—it’s very heavy. Also, if the design were more attractive, had additional features, and was wireless, it would be an amazing product for its price. In its current…”
Epomaker Luma40 vs Magcore 87 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 25 specs differ
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker Magcore 87
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Luma40 vs Magcore 87: your questions
The Magcore 87 is oriented toward gaming with adjustable actuation, Rapid Trigger, an 8000Hz polling rate and vendor-listed 0.125ms latency over its wired connection. Luma40 offers a 1000Hz polling rate in wired or 2.4 GHz mode and adds Bluetooth connectivity.
Yes. Its listed connection modes are Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz and wired, and it has a 1450mAh battery. The Magcore 87 is wired-only.
No Bluetooth connection is listed for the Magcore 87; it is described as wired-only and connects by Type-C cable. For wireless use, the Luma40 lists Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz options.
The Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard, while the Magcore 87 is a TKL keyboard with 88 keys. The Luma40 omits a function row, dedicated arrow keys and numpad, so its compactness comes with a more restricted layout.
Yes. The Luma40 lists support for both QMK and VIA, while the Magcore 87 lists VIA support.
No. The Luma40's compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps, and say standard MX keycaps will not fit. Its north-facing LEDs can also interfere with Cherry-profile keycaps.
The Magcore 87 is hot-swappable for inductive switches, but the vendor specifies that its sockets do not accept 3-pin or 5-pin mechanical switches. Check that replacement switches are inductive before buying them.
The Luma40 is listed at 1000Hz, and its vendor description specifies 1000Hz in 2.4 GHz or wired mode and 125Hz in Bluetooth mode. The Magcore 87 is listed at 8000Hz over its wired connection.
The Luma40 weighs 410g, while the Magcore 87 is listed at around 2kg. The Luma40 is also smaller, measuring 21 x 240 x 87 mm compared with Magcore 87's 40 x 357 x 136 mm.
Both have RGB lighting. Luma40 uses north-facing LEDs and PC keycaps described by the vendor as light-transmitting; Magcore 87 has south-facing per-key RGB, but its compatibility note warns that shine-through legends stay dark.
It depends on your preferred layout. Luma40 offers an ortholinear 40% layout and QMK support, but lacks dedicated arrow and function keys; Magcore 87 has a TKL 88-key arrangement and VIA support.
Both list Mac/Win support. The Luma40 vendor description also names Android compatibility, while the Magcore 87 description specifies Mac and Windows.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.