Epomaker Luma40 vs Split70Compact Ortho vs Split Ergo Comparison
Choose the Luma40 for extreme portability and a unique ortholinear layout, or the Split70 for ergonomic comfort and a more traditional, feature-rich typing experience.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 (3)5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.0 (15)4.0 · 15 reviews
from$98at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Compact Ortho
Build quality in the top 20% of 40% boards under $150.
- Ultra-portable 40% ortholinear layout in a compact CNC aluminum case.
- Very low front height and low-profile switches may reduce wrist strain.
- Includes sound dampening with a switch pad and bottom sponge.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker Split70
Split Ergo Comparison
- Split ergonomic design with a 7-degree typing angle to reduce arm and shoulder tension.
- Includes a programmable knob for media or macro control.
- Gasket mount structure with five layers of sound dampening for a premium typing feel.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If your priority is a minimalist, travel-friendly keyboard that challenges you with an ortholinear layout, the Luma40 is the compelling option. If you want enhanced ergonomics, a more traditional but split layout with useful features like a knob, and a potentially more refined typing sound, the Split70 is the better investment for a stationary desk setup.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker Split70
Battery
1,450 mAh
3,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
Yes
No
Ergonomics
Ortholinear
Split
Case material
Aluminum
ABS
Switch options
Clicky, Linear
Linear
- Epomaker Luma40
- Epomaker Split70
- Performance
- 7478
- Build quality
- 8178
- Productivity
- 8893
- Customizability
- 8591
- Portability
- 8588
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- QMK
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Split70 wins in most productivity-focused categories like Office, Programming, and Content Creation due to its more accessible layout, included knob, and ergonomic split design. The Luma40 is the clear choice for Travel due to its minimal size and weight. For Gaming and Modding, the choice is more nuanced, tied to preference for desk space versus ergonomics, and tray versus gasket mounting.
It's a tie
- Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate and 3ms latency in wired mode for responsive input.
- Both support N-Key Rollover for simultaneous key presses.
- The Luma40's lighter weight and smaller footprint free up desk space for mouse movement, while the Split70's split design may offer more comfortable arm positioning for long sessions.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker Split70
15 owner reviews
“Check out my full review - https://dezdoes.com/epomaker-split-70-the-learning-curve-and-triumph-of-split-ergonomics/”
“i bet its a great product but i never got it because there was an issue with the destination info.. im kinda down eighty bucks and a keyboard.. im working my butt off so i can try to get a new one”
Epomaker Luma40 vs Split70 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
12 of 27 specs differ
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker Split70
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Luma40 vs Split70: your questions
The Split70 is explicitly designed for ergonomics with its split layout that allows you to position each half to shoulder width, a 7-degree typing angle, and a design marketed to alleviate arm and shoulder tension. The Luma40 offers an ortholinear layout which promotes straight finger movements, but it is a flat, unitary board.
Yes, both keyboards are listed as compatible with Mac systems. The Luma40 includes Mac modifier keycaps in the box, and the Split70 listing also mentions Mac compatibility and includes three Mac keycaps.
The Split70 has a significantly larger 3000mAh battery, rated for 11 hours with RGB on and 260 hours with it off. The Luma40 has a 1450mAh battery, rated for 7 hours with RGB on and 75 hours with it off.
Yes, both the Luma40 and Split70 feature hot-swappable sockets. The Luma40 is compatible with Kailh low-profile switches, while the Split70 supports standard 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
Both keyboards support VIA and QMK firmware for deep customization, allowing for key remapping, layer creation, and macro programming in real-time. This is a major shared strength.
According to a vendor response to a customer review, both halves of the Split70 need to be connected to each other to function, even in wireless mode. A USB C-to-C cable for connecting the halves is included in the box.
The Luma40 comes with low-profile, transparent PC plastic keycaps with silk-screened legends. The Split70 comes with Cherry profile, dye-sublimated PBT keycaps, which are typically more resistant to shine and wear.
The Luma40 is far better for small desks due to its tiny 40% footprint (240mm x 87mm). The Split70, while split, has a combined width of 372mm and requires space to position both halves comfortably.
The mounting structure is a key differentiator. The Luma40 uses a tray mount with foam dampening, while the Split70 uses a gasket mount with five layers of padding (latex, IXPE, PET, sponge, silicone), which typically yields a softer, more cushioned typing experience.
No, the Luma40 is designed specifically for Kailh low-profile switches, which have a different footprint and lower travel than standard MX-style switches. The Split70, however, is compatible with standard 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
The Split70 has south-facing RGB LEDs. The Luma40 has north-facing RGB LEDs. South-facing LEDs prevent interference with certain Cherry-profile keycaps, while north-facing LEDs can provide brighter shine-through on the front of keycaps.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.