Epomaker Luma40 vs TH33Ortho Board or Numpad?
Choose the Luma40 for a compact, complete 40% ortholinear keyboard, or the TH33 when you need a dedicated programmable numpad alongside another keyboard.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- CNC aluminum case with a polycarbonate plate.
- 40% ortholinear, low-profile layout with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity.
- Hot-swappable Kailh low-profile switches, plus QMK and VIA support.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker TH33
Battery
Build quality in the top 20% of Numpad boards under $50.
- 33-key numpad with dedicated numpad and function keys, plus a programmable knob.
- Gasket mount with five sound-optimizing layers described by the vendor.
- PBT keycaps, polycarbonate plate, and south-facing RGB LEDs.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Numpad only. This is not a full keyboard.
Pick the Luma40 if you want one compact keyboard for regular typing and value its ortholinear low-profile layout, aluminum case, and QMK support. Choose the TH33 if you already have a keyboard and want a lower-cost numpad with VIA programming, a knob, and gasket-mounted construction. Check the keycap and layout limits before buying either board.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker TH33
Layout size
40%
Numpad
Battery
1,450 mAh
2,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
Yes
No
Ergonomics
Ortholinear
Standard
Case material
Aluminum
ABS
- Epomaker Luma40
- Epomaker TH33
- Performance
- 7478
- Build quality
- 8177
- Productivity
- 8888
- Customizability
- 8582
- Portability
- 8590
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- VIA
- Sound dampening
- Plate material: Polycarbonate
What will you mostly use it for?
The main decision is whether you need a complete compact keyboard or an additional number pad. The Luma40 is the more direct fit for gaming, programming, and travel as a primary typing device, though its 40% layout is highly compact. Office use can go either way, depending on whether low-profile ortholinear keys or dedicated numeric entry matters more. The TH33 has the edge as a programmable companion for controls and macros.
Pick the Epomaker Luma40
- The Luma40 is a 40% keyboard, while the TH33 is a numpad rather than a primary typing board.
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and wired, 2.4 GHz, and Bluetooth connectivity.
- Luma40 metadata lists both clicky and linear switch types; TH33 lists linear switches.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker TH33
6 owner reviews
“Wow, at first I thought it was gonna be useless because I don't use arrows nor numpad, that's why I use only 60% keyboard. When I recieved the TH33 I noticed that I can remap every single button. Now I use it as a budget stream deck, I put on matching keycaps…”
“It was what I wanted but the usability was not as good as I wanted. Software was very buggy and there are almost no alternative keycap options.”
Epomaker Luma40 vs TH33 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 26 specs differ
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker TH33
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Luma40 vs TH33: your questions
The Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard, and its compatibility rules note that it has no function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad. The TH33 is a 33-key numpad, not a full keyboard.
No, the TH33 is a numpad-only device with 33 keys. Its vendor description highlights numpad, function, navigation, and media controls, but it is not a full typing keyboard.
The Luma40 is the more direct choice as a compact primary keyboard, with a 40% ortholinear layout and QMK and VIA support. The TH33 is designed as a separate numpad with VIA programming.
Yes. Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired connectivity, along with USB-C in their features.
No, the Luma40 compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps only, and say standard MX keycaps will not fit. Its vendor description identifies Kailh low-profile switch sockets.
The Luma40 has north-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rules warn that Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing. Check keycap clearance before changing the stock caps.
The TH33 has south-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rules warn that shine-through legends stay dark. Some sculpted keycaps can also clip the LED.
Both are hot-swappable and support VIA. The Luma40 additionally lists QMK support, while the TH33 supports 3/5-pin mechanical switches according to its vendor description.
The Luma40 uses a tray mount, and its vendor describes a cushioned structure with acoustic foams. The TH33 uses a gasket mount with five sound-optimizing layers listed by the vendor.
The TH33 is a dedicated numpad with 33 keys. The Luma40's compatibility rules specifically say it has no numpad.
The TH33 supports VIA, and its vendor describes programmable remapping and macro layers. It also includes a programmable knob, making it suited to use as an additional control pad.
The TH33 lists a 2000 mAh battery, compared with the Luma40's 1450 mAh battery. The Luma40 vendor description gives battery-life figures that vary depending on whether RGB is on or off.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.










