Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 31, 2026

Epomaker Luma40 vs TH33Ortho Board or Numpad?

Choose the Luma40 for a compact, complete 40% ortholinear keyboard, or the TH33 when you need a dedicated programmable numpad alongside another keyboard.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

EPOMAKER LUMA40

Epomaker Luma40

5.0 · 3 reviews

from$92at Epomaker

90-day low

EPOMAKER TH33

Battery

Epomaker TH33

4.3 · 6 reviews

from$42at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker Luma40

Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.

If you want

  • CNC aluminum case with a polycarbonate plate.
  • 40% ortholinear, low-profile layout with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity.
  • Hot-swappable Kailh low-profile switches, plus QMK and VIA support.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Get the

Epomaker TH33

Battery

Build quality in the top 20% of Numpad boards under $50.

If you want

  • 33-key numpad with dedicated numpad and function keys, plus a programmable knob.
  • Gasket mount with five sound-optimizing layers described by the vendor.
  • PBT keycaps, polycarbonate plate, and south-facing RGB LEDs.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • Numpad only. This is not a full keyboard.

Bottom line

Pick the Luma40 if you want one compact keyboard for regular typing and value its ortholinear low-profile layout, aluminum case, and QMK support. Choose the TH33 if you already have a keyboard and want a lower-cost numpad with VIA programming, a knob, and gasket-mounted construction. Check the keycap and layout limits before buying either board.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker Luma40

Epomaker TH33

  • Layout size

    40%

    Numpad

  • Battery

    1,450 mAh

    2,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Low profile

    Yes

    No

  • Ergonomics

    Ortholinear

    Standard

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    ABS

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker Luma40
  • Epomaker TH33
Performance
74
78
Build quality
81
77
Productivity
88
88
Customizability
85
82
Portability
85
90

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
  • VIA
  • Sound dampening
  • Plate material: Polycarbonate
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The main decision is whether you need a complete compact keyboard or an additional number pad. The Luma40 is the more direct fit for gaming, programming, and travel as a primary typing device, though its 40% layout is highly compact. Office use can go either way, depending on whether low-profile ortholinear keys or dedicated numeric entry matters more. The TH33 has the edge as a programmable companion for controls and macros.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker Luma40

  • The Luma40 is a 40% keyboard, while the TH33 is a numpad rather than a primary typing board.
  • Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and wired, 2.4 GHz, and Bluetooth connectivity.
  • Luma40 metadata lists both clicky and linear switch types; TH33 lists linear switches.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Epomaker Luma40

5.0

3 owner reviews

Praise
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Sajad m.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Epomaker TH33

4.3

6 owner reviews

Praise
“Wow, at first I thought it was gonna be useless because I don't use arrows nor numpad, that's why I use only 60% keyboard. When I recieved the TH33 I noticed that I can remap every single button. Now I use it as a budget stream deck, I put on matching keycaps…”
Bruno P.Verified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“It was what I wanted but the usability was not as good as I wanted. Software was very buggy and there are almost no alternative keycap options.”
Obafemi A.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

Epomaker Luma40 vs TH33 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

13 of 26 specs differ

Epomaker Luma40

Epomaker TH33

Typing & switches

Switch options

Clicky, Linear
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Tray Mount
Gasket Mount

Low profile

Yes
No

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

40%
Numpad

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Ortholinear
Standard

Knob

No
Yes

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
1,000 Hz

Battery

1,450 mAh
2,000 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS

Plate material

Polycarbonate
Polycarbonate

Keycaps

PC
PBT

Weight

410 g
380 g

Dimensions

21 x 240 x 87 mm
45 x 151 x 141 mm

Typing angle

—
6°

Backlight

RGB, north-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

QMK

Yes
No

VIA

Yes
Yes

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2025

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker Luma40 vs TH33: your questions

The Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard, and its compatibility rules note that it has no function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad. The TH33 is a 33-key numpad, not a full keyboard.

No, the TH33 is a numpad-only device with 33 keys. Its vendor description highlights numpad, function, navigation, and media controls, but it is not a full typing keyboard.

The Luma40 is the more direct choice as a compact primary keyboard, with a 40% ortholinear layout and QMK and VIA support. The TH33 is designed as a separate numpad with VIA programming.

Yes. Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired connectivity, along with USB-C in their features.

No, the Luma40 compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps only, and say standard MX keycaps will not fit. Its vendor description identifies Kailh low-profile switch sockets.

The Luma40 has north-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rules warn that Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing. Check keycap clearance before changing the stock caps.

The TH33 has south-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rules warn that shine-through legends stay dark. Some sculpted keycaps can also clip the LED.

Both are hot-swappable and support VIA. The Luma40 additionally lists QMK support, while the TH33 supports 3/5-pin mechanical switches according to its vendor description.

The Luma40 uses a tray mount, and its vendor describes a cushioned structure with acoustic foams. The TH33 uses a gasket mount with five sound-optimizing layers listed by the vendor.

The TH33 is a dedicated numpad with 33 keys. The Luma40's compatibility rules specifically say it has no numpad.

The TH33 supports VIA, and its vendor describes programmable remapping and macro layers. It also includes a programmable knob, making it suited to use as an additional control pad.

The TH33 lists a 2000 mAh battery, compared with the Luma40's 1450 mAh battery. The Luma40 vendor description gives battery-life figures that vary depending on whether RGB is on or off.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.