Epomaker Luma40 vs AULA EA75 MaxCompact Ortho vs Feature-Packed 75%
Choose the Luma40 for extreme portability and ortholinear typing, or the EA75 Max for a full-featured layout with a screen and knob.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 (3)5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.8 (16)4.8 · 16 reviews
from$67at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Compact Ortho
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- Ultra-compact 40% ortholinear layout saves substantial desk space.
- CNC aluminum case construction for a premium, solid feel.
- Full QMK and VIA firmware support for deep key remapping and macro programming.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
AULA EA75 Max
Feature-Packed 75%
Build quality in the top 45% of 75% boards under $100.
- 75% layout retains arrow keys and function row in a relatively compact form factor.
- Features a TFT screen and a multifunction metal knob for system controls and customization.
- Massive 5000mAh battery capacity for extended wireless use.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No numpad.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If your workflow demands extreme portability, a unique ortholinear typing experience, and deep firmware-level customization, the Epomaker Luma40 is the compelling option. If you prefer a more traditional, feature-rich keyboard with a screen, knob, and longer battery life for a stationary desk setup, the Epomaker EA75 Max provides significantly more functionality out of the box.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Luma40
AULA EA75 Max
Layout size
40%
75%
Battery
1,450 mAh
5,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
Yes
No
Ergonomics
Ortholinear
Standard
Case material
Aluminum
ABS
- Epomaker Luma40
- AULA EA75 Max
- Performance
- 7478
- Build quality
- 8168
- Productivity
- 8883
- Customizability
- 8573
- Portability
- 8579
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Sound dampening
- Plate material: Polycarbonate
What will you mostly use it for?
The EA75 Max wins for office work, gaming, and content creation due to its functional layout, multimedia knob, and screen. The Luma40 is the clear choice for travel thanks to its minimal size and weight, and it ties for programming due to its high software customizability. For modding enthusiasts, the Luma40's open firmware support gives it an edge.
Pick the AULA EA75 Max
- The EA75 Max's 75% layout includes dedicated arrow keys for in-game menus and controls.
- Its listed 1-8ms latency in wired and 2.4GHz modes may offer a slight responsiveness edge for competitive play.
- The inclusion of a knob allows for quick volume or RGB adjustments without leaving a game.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
AULA EA75 Max
16 owner reviews
“The only bad thing is that the software is pretty hard to found, I don’t even know if it’s out there actually, anyways the product fantastic, the switches are smooth and lubed and the quality of the product is excellent”
“Good switches, nice keycaps. Shitty outsated driver. Some rgb doesn’t change even when using its own setting, doesn’t work with signalRGB. Sometimes when I turn on my pc the keyboard glitches and i have to switch to and from wireless mode for it to work…”
Epomaker Luma40 vs AULA EA75 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
16 of 26 specs differ
Epomaker Luma40
AULA EA75 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Luma40 vs AULA EA75 Max: your questions
The Epomaker EA75 Max is likely more beginner-friendly. Its 75% layout is more familiar, requiring less layer memorization than the Luma40's 40% ortholinear layout. The EA75 Max also includes a screen and knob for intuitive adjustments without needing to learn firmware software immediately.
Yes, but it requires adaptation. The Luma40 lacks dedicated arrow keys, so you must program them onto a secondary layer using its VIA software. Its 1000Hz polling rate and N-key rollover support gaming performance, but the ortholinear layout and missing keys may not be ideal for all game genres.
The manufacturer's description states the TFT screen can display time, battery life, connectivity status, operating modes, and GIFs. There is no provided information indicating it can show real-time system performance metrics like CPU or GPU usage from the host computer.
Yes, both keyboards use standard keycap mounts. The Luma40 uses low-profile keycaps, which have a specific stem spacing and may not be compatible with all standard MX-style keycap sets. The EA75 Max uses Cherry profile, double-shot PBT keycaps that are compatible with most standard MX-style keycaps.
The Epomaker EA75 Max has a significantly larger 5000mAh battery compared to the Luma40's 1450mAh battery. While exact hours depend on usage and RGB settings, the EA75 Max's larger capacity will provide substantially longer wireless operation between charges.
The Luma40 uses a tray mount, where the PCB is screwed directly into the case. The EA75 Max uses a gasket mount, where the plate holding the switches is suspended by rubber or silicone gaskets. Gasket mount typically offers a softer, more uniform typing feel with less harsh vibration, as described in the EA75 Max's listing.
Both keyboards are hot-swappable. The Luma40 is compatible with 5-pin Kailh low-profile switches. The EA75 Max is compatible with 3-pin and 5-pin standard mechanical switches and is listed as offering a 'Cotton Candy' silent linear switch option, confirming silent switch compatibility.
Yes, both the Epomaker Luma40 and EA75 Max list Mac compatibility. The Luma40 includes Mac modifier keycaps. The EA75 Max listing notes that Mac modifier keycaps are not included, but the keyboard is compatible with Mac systems.
Based on construction, the EA75 Max is designed to be quieter. It features a gasket mount and five specific layers of sound-dampening foam aimed at creating a 'creamy' sound. The Luma40 also has sound dampening (switch pad and bottom sponge) but uses a tray mount in an aluminum case, which can lead to a sharper, more resonant sound profile.
A customer review for the EA75 Max mentions the software is 'pretty hard to found.' The manufacturer provides a driver download link on the product page, but users should be prepared to download it directly from Epomaker's site for customization features, which only work in wired PC mode.
According to the vendor pages, Epomaker offers a 1-year warranty for keyboards purchased from their site. This covers factory defects affecting functionality. Batteries have a 3-month warranty. It's advised to contact support with proof of any issues.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.











