Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 11, 2026

Epomaker Luma40 vs KBDFans Agar MiniLow-Profile or Gasket Mount

Choose the Luma40 for a lighter low-profile wireless board with RGB, or the Agar Mini for a heavier gasket-mounted build with more material and firmware options.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker Luma40

Battery

Build quality in the top 20% of 40% boards under $150.

If you want

  • Tri-mode connectivity includes Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connections.
  • The 410g aluminum board is lighter and smaller than the Agar Mini.
  • Low-profile ortholinear layout with a polycarbonate plate.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.

Get the

KBDFans Agar Mini

Build quality in the top 5% of 40% boards under $200.

If you want

  • Gasket mount with a 9° typing angle.
  • Lists aluminum, polycarbonate, and brass case materials, plus aluminum, carbon fiber, FR4, and polycarbonate plate options.
  • Supports QMK, VIA, and VIAL, with hot-swappable switches.

Bottom line

Choose the Epomaker Luma40 if low weight, low-profile ortholinear typing, RGB, and 2.4 GHz wireless are your priorities. Choose the KBDFans Agar Mini if you want gasket mounting, VIAL support, and more listed material choices for a customizable build. Check the Luma40's low-profile keycap and switch requirements before buying replacement parts.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker Luma40

KBDFans Agar Mini

  • Connection

    Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

    Bluetooth, Wired

    Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency

  • Battery

    1,450 mAh

    1,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Low profile

    Yes

    No

  • Ergonomics

    Ortholinear

    Standard

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    Aluminum, Brass, Polycarbonate

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker Luma40
  • KBDFans Agar Mini
Performance
73
63
Build quality
81
94
Productivity
88
94
Customizability
85
94
Portability
85
87

What they share

  • Layout size: 40%
  • Hot-swappable
  • Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
  • QMK
  • VIA
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Luma40 is the more convenient fit for travel and for buyers who want RGB or 2.4 GHz wireless. The Agar Mini takes the edge for modding, with VIAL support and a wider range of listed case and plate materials. Office and gaming needs lean toward the Luma40 based on its low-profile design and connection options. For programming, the Agar Mini's additional firmware option is useful, though both support QMK and VIA.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker Luma40

  • The Luma40 supports 1000 Hz polling over 2.4 GHz or wired connections.
  • It offers 2.4 GHz wireless and RGB, while the Agar Mini has no RGB and lists Bluetooth and wired connectivity.

Full specs

Epomaker Luma40 vs KBDFans Agar Mini specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

12 of 27 specs differ

Epomaker Luma40

KBDFans Agar Mini

Typing & switches

Switch options

Clicky, Linear
—

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Tray Mount
Gasket Mount

Low profile

Yes
No

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

40%
40%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Ortholinear
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
1,000 Hz

Battery

1,450 mAhBetter
1,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Aluminum, Brass, Polycarbonate

Plate material

Polycarbonate
Aluminum, CarbonFiber, FR4, Polycarbonate

Keycaps

PC
—

Weight

410 g
700 g

Dimensions

21 x 240 x 87 mm
40 x 250 x 120 mm

Typing angle

—
9°

Backlight

RGB, north-facing
None

Firmware & software

QMK

Yes
Yes

VIA

Yes
Yes

VIAL

No
Yes

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2025

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker Luma40 vs KBDFans Agar Mini: your questions

The Luma40 is a 410g low-profile ortholinear keyboard with RGB and Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. The Agar Mini is a 700g gasket-mounted board with no RGB and adds VIAL support.

Yes, the Luma40 supports Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, as well as a wired connection. Its vendor listing specifies 1000 Hz polling in 2.4 GHz or wired mode.

No, the Agar Mini is listed without RGB. The Luma40 has customizable RGB with north-facing per-key LEDs.

The Luma40 weighs 410g, while the Agar Mini weighs 700g. The Luma40 also has smaller listed dimensions at 21 x 240 x 87 mm, compared with the Agar Mini's 40 x 250 x 120 mm.

No, the Luma40 compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps only, so standard MX keycaps will not fit. Its north-facing LEDs may also interfere with Cherry-profile keycaps.

The Agar Mini lists QMK, VIA, and VIAL support. The Luma40 lists QMK and VIA support.

Yes, both keyboards are listed as hot-swappable. The Luma40 specifically uses Kailh low-profile mechanical switches, so replacement switches need to match its low-profile requirement.

The Agar Mini offers VIAL in addition to QMK and VIA, and lists several case and plate materials. The Luma40 also supports hot-swapping, QMK, and VIA, but its low-profile switch and keycap compatibility limits should be considered when choosing replacement parts.

The Agar Mini's listed connectivity is Bluetooth and wired, with wireless also indicated in its metadata. Unlike the Luma40, its listed connection details do not specify a 2.4 GHz mode.

The KBDFans Agar Mini uses a gasket mount and has a listed typing angle of 9°. The Epomaker Luma40 uses a tray mount and is listed with a flat typing angle.

The Luma40 has an aluminum case, polycarbonate plate, and PC keycaps. The Agar Mini lists aluminum, polycarbonate, and brass case materials, and aluminum, carbon fiber, FR4, and polycarbonate plate options.

Both boards support QMK, VIA, and hot-swappable switches, which provide options for changing layouts and switches. The Agar Mini adds VIAL support, while the Luma40 offers a low-profile ortholinear layout.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.