Compare Epomaker QK108 vs RT82 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two feature-rich, screen-equipped Epomaker keyboards at a similar price point. The choice hinges on a fundamental trade-off: the QK108's 100% layout with a dedicated number pad versus the RT82's space-saving 75% design. Both offer tri-mode connectivity, gasket mounts, VIA software support, and extensive sound-dampening, making the decision a matter of desk space, key requirements, and specific feature preferences like screen design and battery capacity.

Model
	84	79	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	3.7 stars (6 reviews)	4.6 stars (34 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Has Linear, Tactile, Silent switch options Available in a 100% layout Comes with a knob Includes a Yes, LED display Equipped with a 8000 mAh battery Weighs about 1180 g Sized at 43 x 439 x 139 mm	Has Linear, Silent switch options Available in a 75% layout Includes a Yes, LCD display Equipped with a 4000 mAh battery Weighs about 1000 g Sized at 40 x 327 x 143 mm
Score	Scores Performance: 80.7 Build Quality: 75.3 Productivity: 88.5 Customizability: 82.2 Portability: 62	Scores Performance: 78.7 Build Quality: 74 Productivity: 83.6 Customizability: 78.5 Portability: 80.3
Name	Name Epomaker QK108	Name Epomaker RT82
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2025
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear, Tactile, Silent	Switch Options Linear, Silent
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 100%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support LED	Display Support LCD
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 1000 Hz	Polling Rate 1000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 8000 mAh	Battery capacity 4000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb, South-face	Backlight Rgb, South-face
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material ABS	Case Material ABS
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 43 x 439 x 139 mm	Dimensions 40 x 327 x 143 mm
Weight	Weight 1180g	Weight 1000g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary need dictates the choice. If you require a number pad for work, value maximum battery life, and want a knob for media control, the Epomaker QK108 is the logical pick. If your priority is a smaller footprint for a tidy desk or travel, and you prefer the novelty of a detachable screen, the Epomaker RT82 is the better compact option. Both deliver excellent core features like gasket-mounted typing feel and deep software customization.

Epomaker QK108

+Full 104-key layout with a dedicated number pad.
+Large 8000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
+Includes a programmable control knob.
+Five-layer sound dampening with sandwich latex, IXPE, PET, foam, and silicone.
+Comes with additional Mac modifier keycaps.

−Large size (439mm wide) consumes significant desk space.
−Heavier at 1180 grams.
−Lacks the detachable screen feature of the RT82.

Epomaker RT82

+Compact 75% layout (80 keys) saves desk space.
+Features a magnetically detachable 1.14-inch LCD screen.
+Lighter weight at approximately 1000 grams.
+Includes the same five-layer sound-dampening foam system.
+Offers three adjustable typing angles via a kickstand.

−Smaller 4000mAh battery.
−No dedicated number pad or function row.
−Does not include a control knob.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The QK108 is the clear choice for office work and data-heavy tasks due to its number pad and superior battery, while the RT82 wins for portability. For gaming and modding, the keyboards are evenly matched on core performance and customization features. Programmers and content creators can choose based on their preference for a full or compact layout, as both offer excellent programmability.

GamingTie

•Both share identical 1000Hz polling rates and 3ms/5ms latency in wired and 2.4GHz modes.
•Both feature N-key rollover and hot-swappable sockets for switch customization.
•The QK108 offers a full layout for macro keys, while the RT82's compact size frees up mouse space.

OfficeEpomaker QK108

•The QK108's 100% layout includes a dedicated number pad for data entry.
•Its larger 8000mAh battery offers longer runtime between charges.
•It includes a programmable knob for quick media or volume control.

ProgrammingTie

•Both support VIA/QMK for deep key remapping and macro creation.
•Both use Cherry profile PBT keycaps for a consistent typing feel.
•The QK108 has more dedicated keys, while the RT82's compact layout may suit minimalist setups.

TravelEpomaker RT82

•The RT82 is significantly more compact (327mm wide vs 439mm).
•It is lighter (1000g vs 1180g).
•Its 4000mAh battery still provides ample life, with up to 115 hours with lighting off.

ModdingTie

•Both are hot-swappable with 5-pin sockets and include a switch puller.
•Both use a gasket mount with a 5-layer sound-dampening system (latex, IXPE, PET, foam, silicone).
•Both have full VIA support for firmware-level customization.

Content CreationEpomaker QK108

•The QK108's knob can be programmed for timeline scrubbing or brush size adjustment.
•The full layout provides quick access to numeric shortcuts in editing software.
•The larger battery supports long editing sessions without interruption.