Epomaker RT75 vs RT82
Choose the RT75 for its larger TFT screen and bigger battery, or the RT82 for VIA support, a lighter body, and lower relative pricing.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 (5)5.0 · 5 reviews
from$91at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.6 (41)4.6 · 41 reviews
from$60at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker RT75
Battery
Build quality in the bottom 50% of 75% boards under $100.
- Detachable TFT screen can display GIFs, images, a clock, or system information, and the vendor says it can be replaced with four keys.
- 5000mAh battery, larger than the RT82's listed 4000mAh capacity.
- Vendor describes a six-layer sound-dampening structure with PORON, PET, acoustic foam, and silicone.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Epomaker RT82
VIA
Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $100.
- VIA support, with vendor-described key remapping, macros, and Mod-Tap customization.
- Lighter 1000g listed weight and smaller listed dimensions than the RT75.
- N-key rollover is listed, alongside a 1000 Hz polling rate.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Pick the RT75 if you prioritize its detachable TFT screen and larger 5000mAh battery. Choose the RT82 if VIA customization, N-key rollover, and a lighter, smaller board are more useful to your setup. Both are hot-swappable 75% keyboards with tri-mode connectivity, so the main trade-off is feature emphasis rather than layout or connection options.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker RT75
Epomaker RT82
Battery
5,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Switch options
Linear, Silent, Tactile
Linear, Silent
Display
TFT
LCD
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
1,165 g
1,000 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
VIA
No
Yes
GUI remapping without compiling firmware
- Epomaker RT75
- Epomaker RT82
- Performance
- 6178
- Build quality
- 6674
- Productivity
- 7682
- Customizability
- 6678
- Portability
- 8079
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: ABS
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
What will you mostly use it for?
The RT82 edges out the RT75 for gaming, programming, travel, modding, and content creation, mainly through VIA support, lower weight, and its listed gaming input features. Office use is a close match because both offer silent switch options and wireless connectivity, while their battery and display strengths differ. The RT75 remains appealing when its larger screen, 5000mAh battery, or broader listed switch-type range matters more than VIA or reduced weight.
Pick the Epomaker RT82
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, while the RT82 vendor specifies 3 ms wired latency and N-key rollover.
- The RT82 is 165g lighter and has a smaller listed footprint.
- The RT75 lists a wider range of switch types, including tactile options, if that feel is preferred.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker RT75
5 owner reviews
“A fantastic keyboard, with a display that's perfect to add more style to it. My colleagues are all envious ;)”
Epomaker RT82
41 owner reviews
“I love the sound, the keyboard was shipped fast, but i have found some of the keys have input issues at times where it doesn't register the key being pushed”
“I received an informative sms two months ago that the keyboard is arriving, It has still not arrived.”
Epomaker RT75 vs RT82 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 23 specs differ
Epomaker RT75
Epomaker RT82
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker RT75 vs RT82: your questions
The RT75 has a detachable TFT screen and a 5000mAh battery, while the RT82 has VIA support, N-key rollover, and a 4000mAh battery. The RT82 is also lighter at 1000g, compared with the RT75's 1165g.
The RT82 lists VIA support, and its product description specifies key remapping, macros, and Mod-Tap. VIA support is not listed for the RT75, so choose the RT82 if that customization method is important.
The RT75 vendor describes a detachable 1.54-inch TFT screen, while the RT82 has a 1.14-inch LCD screen. Both screens are described as detachable, but the RT75 display can also be replaced with four keys.
The RT75 has the larger stated battery capacity at 5000mAh, compared with 4000mAh for the RT82. The RT82 vendor also gives battery-life figures that vary with RGB and screen use, ranging from 14 to 115 hours.
Yes. Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired connectivity, and both include a 1000 Hz polling rate in their product metadata.
The RT82 has a clearer feature advantage for gaming because its vendor lists N-key rollover and 3 ms wired latency. Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, and the RT75's product description gives 4 ms wired latency.
Both keyboards are hot-swappable. The RT82 vendor specifically says it supports 3- and 5-pin mechanical switches, while the RT75 product description says its PCB is hot-swappable.
The RT82 is listed at 1000g, compared with 1165g for the RT75, and its listed dimensions are smaller. Both support Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, so the RT82 is the lighter option for moving between setups.
Both product listings include silent switch options. The RT75 also lists tactile switches, while the RT82's listed switch types are linear and silent.
Both metadata listings specify Mac/Windows support. The RT75 vendor also describes included Mac modifier keycaps, and the RT82 vendor lists additional Mac keycaps in its contents.
Both use south-facing LEDs, and the compatibility notes say shine-through legends stay dark. The notes also warn that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
The RT75 vendor describes six layers, including PORON, PET, acoustic foam, and bottom silicone. The RT82 vendor lists five layers: sandwich latex, IXPE switch pad, PET sound-enhancement pad, bottom foam, and bottom silicone.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.