Epomaker RT75 vs TH33Screen or VIA Numpad?
Choose the RT75 for a standalone 75% keyboard with a detachable TFT screen, or the TH33 for a compact, VIA-programmable numpad to add to an existing keyboard.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker RT75
Battery
Build quality in the top 50% of 75% boards under $100.
- 75% ANSI layout provides a compact main-keyboard format.
- Detachable TFT screen displays GIFs, images, clock, or system information, and can be replaced by four keys.
- 5000mAh battery, with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity listed.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No numpad.
Get the
Epomaker TH33
Knob
Build quality in the top 20% of Numpad boards under $50.
- 33-key numpad with VIA support and custom macro layers.
- Compact 380g format, with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity.
- Hot-swappable sockets and a linear switch type listed.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Numpad only. This is not a full keyboard.
Choose the RT75 if you need a standalone 75% keyboard and want its detachable TFT screen or silent tactile switch option. Choose the TH33 if you already have a keyboard and want a lighter, VIA-programmable numpad with extra control options. The key decision is whether you need a complete typing layout or a configurable add-on.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker RT75
Epomaker TH33
Layout size
75%
Numpad
Battery
5,000 mAh
2,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Switch options
Linear, Silent, Tactile
Linear
Knob
No
Yes
Display
TFT
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
- Epomaker RT75
- Epomaker TH33
- Performance
- 6178
- Build quality
- 6677
- Productivity
- 7688
- Customizability
- 6682
- Portability
- 8090
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: ABS
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The RT75 is the more suitable choice when the goal is one compact keyboard for regular typing, office work, and gaming. The TH33's strengths are as an add-on: its small, light numpad format and VIA support make it more adaptable for extra controls and macro assignments. For travel, the TH33 is easier to carry by weight and dimensions. The RT75 stands apart for its detachable screen and broader switch-type choices.
Pick the Epomaker RT75
- The RT75 is a 75% keyboard, while the TH33 is a numpad rather than a standalone typing layout.
- Both list 1000 Hz polling, and the RT75 vendor description specifies wired and 2.4 GHz use at that rate.
- The RT75 offers linear and silent tactile switch options in its metadata, while the TH33 lists linear switches.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker RT75
1 owner reviews
“I've been using the Epomaker RT75 for a couple of weeks now as my main keyboard for both productivity and gaming. I got it mainly for its retro design and out of curiosity about the 1.54-inch smart screen, which looks impressive. At first, I thought I'd get…”
Epomaker TH33
6 owner reviews
“Wow, at first I thought it was gonna be useless because I don't use arrows nor numpad, that's why I use only 60% keyboard. When I recieved the TH33 I noticed that I can remap every single button. Now I use it as a budget stream deck, I put on matching keycaps…”
“It was what I wanted but the usability was not as good as I wanted. Software was very buggy and there are almost no alternative keycap options.”
Epomaker RT75 vs TH33 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 24 specs differ
Epomaker RT75
Epomaker TH33
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker RT75 vs TH33: your questions
The RT75 has a 75% ANSI layout, so it is a compact main keyboard rather than a numpad accessory. Its compatibility rules note that it does not include a numpad.
No, the TH33 is a 33-key numpad, not a full keyboard. It is intended to add number-entry and extra controls alongside another keyboard.
Yes, the RT75 has a detachable TFT screen. The vendor says it can display GIFs, images, a clock, or system information, and can be replaced with four keys.
Yes, VIA support and custom macro layers are listed for the TH33. The vendor describes it as programmable for remapping and macros.
The TH33 weighs 380g, while the RT75 weighs 1165g. The TH33's numpad format is also much smaller than the RT75's 75% layout.
Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, along with wired connectivity. The RT75 vendor identifies USB-C for its wired mode, while the TH33 description specifies USB A-to-C wired connectivity.
Yes, hot-swappable designs are listed for both keyboards. The TH33 vendor specifically describes compatibility with 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
The TH33 is a dedicated 33-key numpad. The RT75 uses a 75% layout and its compatibility rules specify that it has no numpad.
Both list RGB with south-facing LEDs. The compatibility notes for both warn that shine-through legends stay dark and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
The RT75 metadata lists linear, tactile, and silent switch types, while the TH33 lists linear. The vendor also describes linear and silent tactile switch versions for the RT75 and a linear Wisteria V2 switch for the TH33.
The TH33 is the clearer fit for macro programming because it lists VIA support and custom macro layers. The RT75 is hot-swappable, but VIA support is not listed for that model.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.










