Compare Epomaker RT82 vs TH108 Pro Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between Epomaker's feature-rich 75% and full-size offerings. Both keyboards share tri-mode connectivity, gasket mounts, hot-swappable PCBs, and screens, making the core decision about layout and specific feature trade-offs. The RT82 offers a compact, portable form factor with a unique detachable screen, while the TH108 Pro provides a complete number pad and a larger battery for extended wireless use.

Model
	79	76	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	4.6 stars (34 reviews)	4.6 stars (30 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Available in a 75% layout Includes a Yes, LCD display Supports VIA configuration Equipped with a 4000 mAh battery Weighs about 1000 g Sized at 40 x 327 x 143 mm	Available in a 100% layout Comes with a knob Includes a Yes, TFT display Equipped with a 10000 mAh battery Weighs about 1120 g Sized at 42 x 445 x 140 mm
Score	Scores Performance: 78.7 Build Quality: 74 Productivity: 83.6 Customizability: 78.5 Portability: 80.3	Scores Performance: 78.2 Build Quality: 68.6 Productivity: 82.7 Customizability: 72.9 Portability: 62.3
Name	Name Epomaker RT82	Name Epomaker TH108 Pro
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2025
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear, Silent	Switch Options Linear, Silent
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 100%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support LCD	Display Support TFT
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 1000 Hz	Polling Rate 1000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 4000 mAh	Battery capacity 10000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb, South-face	Backlight Rgb, South-face
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material ABS	Case Material ABS
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 40 x 327 x 143 mm	Dimensions 42 x 445 x 140 mm
Weight	Weight 1000g	Weight 1120g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your desk space and need for a number pad are the primary deciding factors. If you value a minimalist setup, portability, and open-source firmware, the Epomaker RT82 is the better choice. If you require a full-size keyboard for data entry, prioritize maximum wireless battery life, and want a control knob, the Epomaker TH108 Pro is the obvious pick.

Epomaker RT82

+Compact 75% layout saves considerable desk space.
+Features a magnetically detachable 1.14-inch LCD screen.
+Explicitly supports VIA for open-source key remapping.
+Includes a three-angle adjustable kickstand (5, 7.5, 11 degrees).
+Comes with a detachable mini TV and additional Mac keycaps.

−Smaller 4000mAh battery offers less wireless runtime.
−Lacks a dedicated control knob.
−Does not have a dedicated number pad.

Epomaker TH108 Pro

+Full 100% layout includes a number pad for data entry.
+Massive 10000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
+Includes a multifunctional control knob for volume or screen control.
+Features a flex-cut PC plate and flex-cut FR4 PCB for a softer typing feel.
+Uses double-shot PBT keycaps for enhanced legend durability.

−Large 445mm width requires significant desk space.
−Heavier at 1120g, making it less portable.
−Vendor description mentions a web-based driver but not VIA support.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The TH108 Pro is the clear choice for office work and content creation due to its number pad and control knob. The RT82 wins for travel and has an edge for gaming and modding due to its space-saving design and VIA support. For programming, the choice is a pure preference between compact and full layouts.

GamingEpomaker RT82

•The RT82's 75% layout frees up more desk space for mouse movement.
•Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate and N-key rollover for performance.
•The RT82's vendor page cites a 3ms latency in wired mode, slightly lower than the TH108 Pro's 2ms, though both are low.

OfficeEpomaker TH108 Pro

•The TH108 Pro's 100% layout includes a dedicated number pad for data entry.
•Its massive 10000mAh battery offers significantly longer wireless runtime.
•The inclusion of a knob provides quick volume or screen control.

ProgrammingTie

•The RT82's compact size is efficient, but lacks dedicated navigation keys.
•The TH108 Pro has a full set of keys but takes up more desk space.
•Both support VIA or web-based software for key remapping and macros.

TravelEpomaker RT82

•The RT82 is significantly more compact (327mm wide vs 445mm).
•It is slightly lighter at 1000g compared to 1120g.
•Its detachable screen could be stored separately to reduce risk.

ModdingEpomaker RT82

•The RT82 explicitly lists VIA support for open-source firmware remapping.
•Both are hot-swappable with 5-pin switch support.
•The RT82's vendor description details its five-layer sound dampening system (Sandwich Latex, IXPE, PET, foam, silicone).

Content CreationEpomaker TH108 Pro

•The knob on the TH108 Pro can be mapped to timeline scrubbing or brush size control.
•The full-size layout provides more immediate shortcut key options.
•The large TFT screen can display custom GIFs or status information.