Epomaker RT82 vs TH99 ProCompact 75% vs Full-Featured 96%

The Epomaker TH99 Pro has a significantly larger 10000mAh battery, which the manufacturer states offers 150-200 hours with RGB off. The RT82 has a 4000mAh battery, offering up to 115 hours with RGB and screen off. For maximum wireless runtime, the TH99 Pro is the clear winner.

Yes, but the software support differs. The RT82 explicitly supports VIA, an open-source remapping tool. The TH99 Pro's vendor description mentions a Chrome-based software driver for remapping and macros, but does not specify VIA support. For the most straightforward and community-supported customization, the RT82 has an advantage.

Yes, but the included items vary. The RT82 includes a detachable mini TV screen, a 2-in-1 puller, a USB cable, a 2.4Ghz receiver, a manual, three Mac keycaps, and two extra switches. The TH99 Pro includes the keyboard with built-in screen and knob, a USB cable, a 2.4Ghz receiver, a 2-in-1 puller, a manual, and two extra switches.

The RT82 (75%) is 327mm wide and has 80 keys, omitting the numpad and some navigation keys for a compact form. The TH99 Pro (96%) is 410mm wide with 98 keys, packing a full numpad and arrow keys into a space-saving design that is still significantly wider than the 75% board.

The Epomaker RT82 is better for small desks due to its 75% layout. Its 327mm width saves considerable space compared to the 410mm wide TH99 Pro, allowing more room for your mouse and other peripherals.

Yes. Both the Epomaker RT82 and TH99 Pro feature hot-swappable PCBs that support 5-pin mechanical switches. This allows you to change switches without soldering.

According to their vendor pages, both use multi-layer systems. The RT82 uses Sandwich Latex, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound-enhancement pad, bottom foam, and bottom silicone. The TH99 Pro uses PORON sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad, sound enhancement PET, a PORON latex switch socket pad, and bottom silicone.

Both keyboards offer a 1000Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4Ghz modes. The manufacturer-listed latency is very similar: 3ms (wired) and 5ms (2.4Ghz) for the RT82, versus 2ms (wired) and 5ms (2.4Ghz) for the TH99 Pro. The difference is negligible for most users.

Yes. The RT82 features a two-stage adjustable kickstand that offers three angles: 5, 7.5, and 11 degrees. The TH99 Pro also has an adjustable kickstand, offering angles of 3, 6, 8, and 10.5 degrees according to its specs.

Both use PBT plastic keycaps in a Cherry profile, which resist shine. The TH99 Pro's keycaps are listed as using a double-shot manufacturing technique, while the RT82's use dye-sublimation printing. Double-shot legends typically don't wear off.

Both are compatible with Mac systems. The Epomaker RT82 has a slight edge for Mac users as it includes three additional keycaps (Command, Option) specifically for Mac layout in the box, making the transition easier.

Both screens can display time, battery level, and custom GIFs. The RT82's screen is described as a detachable "mini TV" that can show a typewriter mode. The TH99 Pro's screen is built-in and also functions as an RGB control panel according to its description.