Epomaker RT82 vs AULA EA75 MaxVIA vs Knob
Get the Epomaker RT82 for VIA remapping, its detachable LCD, and adjustable typing angles, or choose the AULA EA75 Max for its multifunction knob, TFT display, and larger battery.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.6 (41)4.6 · 41 reviews
from$60at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.8 (16)4.8 · 16 reviews
from$67at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker RT82
VIA
Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $100.
- VIA support for key remapping, macros, and Mod-Tap functions.
- A magnetically detachable LCD screen, with vendor-described date, time, battery, and GIF display options.
- Three typing-angle settings, 5, 7.5, and 11 degrees, according to the vendor.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
AULA EA75 Max
Knob
Build quality in the top 50% of 75% boards under $100.
- A multifunction knob for volume and RGB adjustments, paired with a TFT display.
- A 5000mAh battery.
- Double-shot PBT keycaps with legends molded into the keycaps.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Choose the Epomaker RT82 for VIA remapping, its detachable LCD, and three vendor-listed typing angles. Choose the AULA EA75 Max for its multifunction knob, TFT status display, and larger 5000mAh battery. Both suit buyers seeking a wireless 75% layout with hot-swap support, but both have the same south-facing LED limitation for shine-through keycaps.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker RT82
AULA EA75 Max
Battery
4,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Knob
No
Yes
Display
LCD
TFT
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
1,000 g
958.5 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
VIA
Yes
No
GUI remapping without compiling firmware
- Epomaker RT82
- AULA EA75 Max
- Performance
- 7878
- Build quality
- 7468
- Productivity
- 8383
- Customizability
- 7873
- Portability
- 7979
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: ABS
- Switch options: Linear, Silent
What will you mostly use it for?
The EA75 Max has a practical edge for desk control and travel, thanks to its knob, screen status display, larger battery, and lower listed weight. The RT82 is the more appealing option for buyers who want VIA-based remapping or more typing-angle choices. Gaming is a close match on the listed polling rate, N-Key Rollover, and connection modes. Both keyboards share the same south-facing LED caveat for shine-through and some sculpted keycaps.
It's a tie
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-Key Rollover.
- Both support wired and 2.4 GHz connections as well as Bluetooth.
- The RT82 offers VIA remapping, while the EA75 Max has a multifunction knob and programmable-key support described by its vendor.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker RT82
41 owner reviews
“I love the sound, the keyboard was shipped fast, but i have found some of the keys have input issues at times where it doesn't register the key being pushed”
“I received an informative sms two months ago that the keyboard is arriving, It has still not arrived.”
AULA EA75 Max
16 owner reviews
“The only bad thing is that the software is pretty hard to found, I don’t even know if it’s out there actually, anyways the product fantastic, the switches are smooth and lubed and the quality of the product is excellent”
“Good switches, nice keycaps. Shitty outsated driver. Some rgb doesn’t change even when using its own setting, doesn’t work with signalRGB. Sometimes when I turn on my pc the keyboard glitches and i have to switch to and from wireless mode for it to work…”
Epomaker RT82 vs AULA EA75 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
7 of 24 specs differ
Epomaker RT82
AULA EA75 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker RT82 vs AULA EA75 Max: your questions
The RT82 has VIA support, a detachable LCD, and vendor-described typing angles of 5, 7.5, and 11 degrees. The EA75 Max adds a multifunction knob, a TFT screen, and a 5000mAh battery.
Yes, the RT82 lists VIA support. Its vendor describes using VIA for key remapping, macros, and Mod-Tap functions.
Yes, the EA75 Max has a multifunction knob. Its vendor says the knob can adjust volume and RGB lighting, while the TFT screen displays information such as time and battery status.
The AULA EA75 Max lists a 5000mAh battery, while the Epomaker RT82 lists 4000mAh. Battery capacity alone does not establish runtime, which can depend on usage and settings.
Both keyboards list hot-swap support. The RT82 vendor specifies compatibility with 3- and 5-pin mechanical switches, and the EA75 Max vendor also specifies 3- and 5-pin switches.
Both have south-facing LEDs, and the compatibility notes warn that shine-through legends stay dark. Some sculpted keycaps may also clip the LEDs.
The AULA EA75 Max is listed at 958.5g, while the Epomaker RT82 is listed at 1000g. The difference is modest, and both are close to a kilogram.
The RT82 vendor describes three typing angles: 5, 7.5, and 11 degrees, using its built-in kickstand. The EA75 Max listing gives a 5-degree angle, while its vendor mentions a two-stage kickstand without listing those same settings.
The EA75 Max vendor describes programmable keys and macro customization through its driver. Its specifications say software supports Windows and Mac, and customization requires wired PC mode.
Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. The EA75 Max vendor identifies its Bluetooth connection as Bluetooth 5.0, while the RT82 listing does not provide a Bluetooth version.
The RT82 vendor describes its LCD screen as magnetically detachable and says it can display information and saved GIFs. The EA75 Max has a TFT screen, but its product description does not identify it as detachable.
Both have a 75% ANSI layout and N-Key Rollover. The RT82 lists VIA support for remapping and macros, while the EA75 Max vendor describes programmable keys and macros through its driver.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.