Epomaker RT82 vs Yunzii B75 Pro MaxSilent vs Knob
Get the Epomaker RT82 for its silent linear switch option, detachable LCD, and adjustable typing angles; choose the Yunzii B75 Pro Max for its knob, QMK support, and 8000mAh battery.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.6 (41)4.6 · 41 reviews
from$60at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
No reviews
from$84at Yunzii
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker RT82
Silent
Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $100.
- Optional silent linear switches, including the Sea Salt Silent switch variant.
- Magnetically detachable LCD with date, time, battery, type-writer mode, and GIF display features.
- Three adjustable typing angles: 5, 7.5, and 11 degrees.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Yunzii B75 Pro Max
Knob
Build quality in the top 15% of 75% boards under $100.
- QMK support alongside VIA, with key remapping and macro customization.
- A multifunction knob that can be customized, with volume as its default function.
- 8000mAh battery.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Choose the Epomaker RT82 for its silent linear switch option, detachable LCD, and three adjustable typing angles. Choose the Yunzii B75 Pro Max for QMK support, a configurable knob, and its 8000mAh battery. Both have south-facing LEDs, so check keycap compatibility if shine-through legends are important to you.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker RT82
Yunzii B75 Pro Max
Battery
4,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Switch options
Linear, Silent
Linear
Knob
No
Yes
Display
LCD
TFT
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
1,000 g
993 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- Epomaker RT82
- Yunzii B75 Pro Max
- Performance
- 7883
- Build quality
- 7480
- Productivity
- 8373
- Customizability
- 7888
- Portability
- 7990
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- VIA
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The B75 Pro Max is the more feature-rich fit for gaming customization, programming, and switch or control modding, with QMK support, a configurable knob, and its larger battery. The RT82 has the clearer office case if a silent switch option matters, and its detachable screen offers distinctive display functions. For travel, the B75 Pro Max has the battery advantage, while both boards have similar listed weights and the same connection modes. Content creators who want a detachable display and GIFs may prefer the RT82.
Pick the Yunzii B75 Pro Max
- The B75 Pro Max supports QMK/VIA customization, including remapping keys and creating macros.
- It has a multifunction knob and an 8000mAh battery.
- The RT82’s listed 1000 Hz polling rate is specifically for wired and 2.4 GHz modes.
Epomaker RT82 vs Yunzii B75 Pro Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 25 specs differ
Epomaker RT82
Yunzii B75 Pro Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker RT82 vs Yunzii B75 Pro Max: your questions
The B75 Pro Max has QMK/VIA customization, a configurable knob, and an 8000mAh battery. The RT82 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4 GHz modes, and also supports N-key rollover.
The RT82 is available with an EPOMAKER Sea Salt Silent linear switch option, according to Epomaker’s product description. The product metadata also identifies its switch type as linear and silent.
Yes, the B75 Pro Max has a multifunction knob. Yunzii says it can be customized, with volume as the default function.
The Yunzii B75 Pro Max has an 8000mAh battery, while the Epomaker RT82 has a 4000mAh battery. The vendor descriptions do not give directly comparable battery-life figures under the same conditions.
Both keyboards support Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, as well as wired connections. The RT82 vendor description calls this tri-mode connectivity, and Yunzii describes the B75 Pro Max as tri-mode too.
The Yunzii B75 Pro Max supports QMK and VIA. The Epomaker RT82 supports VIA, but QMK support is not listed for it.
Both keyboards are hot-swappable. Epomaker specifies 3-pin and 5-pin switch compatibility for the RT82, and Yunzii specifies support for both 3-pin and 5-pin switches on the B75 Pro Max.
Epomaker says its detachable LCD can show the date, time, and keyboard battery, and can display keystrokes in type-writer mode. The vendor also describes support for displaying up to three saved GIFs.
Yunzii says the customizable screen can show indicators including battery level, date, time, and operating system, as well as GIFs and photos. The screen can be customized through an online website, according to the product description.
Both use south-facing LEDs, and the compatibility note warns that shine-through legends stay dark. It also cautions that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LEDs.
The B75 Pro Max is listed at 993g, while the RT82 is listed at 1000g. Both are around 1 kg, so the listed weight difference is small.
The Epomaker RT82 has three documented typing angles: 5, 7.5, and 11 degrees. The B75 Pro Max description mentions a two-stage adjustable kickstand but does not specify its typing angles.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.










