Epomaker Split70 vs TH108Split Ergonomics vs Full-Size Value
Choose the Split70 for ergonomic comfort and deep software customization, or the TH108 for a full-size layout and longer battery life at a lower cost.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.0 (15)4.0 · 15 reviews
from$98at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.6 (48)4.6 · 48 reviews
from$71at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Split70
Split Ergonomics
- Unique split 70% layout designed to reduce arm and shoulder strain.
- Supports VIA and QMK for extensive, real-time key remapping and macros.
- Includes a programmable rotary knob for media or macro control.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Epomaker TH108
Full-Size Value
Build quality in the top 45% of 100% boards under $100.
- Full 108-key layout includes a numpad and all standard keys.
- Massive 8000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
- Includes a 2-stage adjustable kickstand for multiple typing angles.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If ergonomic comfort, deep software customization, and a space-saving innovative form factor are your goals, the Epomaker Split70 is the compelling option. If you require a full-size layout with a numpad, prioritize maximum wireless battery life, and seek a more traditional keyboard at a lower cost, the Epomaker TH108 is the straightforward pick.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Split70
Epomaker TH108
Battery
3,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Ergonomics
Split
Standard
Switch options
Linear
Linear, Silent
Knob
Yes
No
Weight
890 g
1,200 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- Epomaker Split70
- Epomaker TH108
- Performance
- 7875
- Build quality
- 7860
- Productivity
- 9376
- Customizability
- 9159
- Portability
- 8863
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: ABS
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Split70 wins for programming and modding due to its superior software support and ergonomic benefits, and is better for travel due to its lower weight. The TH108 is the clear choice for office work requiring a numpad and benefits from its massive battery. Gaming and content creation are more nuanced, with the Split70 offering ergonomic and control advantages, while the TH108 provides a traditional, stable layout.
Pick the Epomaker Split70
- Lower latency in wired mode (3ms vs 2ms, but both are very low).
- Includes a programmable knob for quick media or macro control.
- Split layout can reduce shoulder and arm tension during long sessions.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Split70
15 owner reviews
“Check out my full review - https://dezdoes.com/epomaker-split-70-the-learning-curve-and-triumph-of-split-ergonomics/”
“i bet its a great product but i never got it because there was an issue with the destination info.. im kinda down eighty bucks and a keyboard.. im working my butt off so i can try to get a new one”
Epomaker TH108
48 owner reviews
“My first mechanical keyboard. A lot of people like the clack of some keyboards. I prefer the silent switches. This keyboard is great and works very well.”
“Its very cool, I just wish I had picked the silent switch version instead. :/”
Epomaker Split70 vs TH108 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 26 specs differ
Epomaker Split70
Epomaker TH108
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Split70 vs TH108: your questions
The TH108 has a significantly larger 8000mAh battery compared to the Split70's 3000mAh battery. The manufacturer states the TH108 can last up to 160 hours with the backlight off, while the Split70 is rated for 260 hours off. For typical use with lighting, the TH108's larger capacity will provide longer wireless runtime.
Yes, the Split70 halves can be connected together with the included USB C-to-C cable to function as a single, fixed-width keyboard. You can also choose to separate them for the ergonomic split typing experience, offering flexibility in your setup.
The Split70 offers superior software customization. It supports both VIA and QMK, which are open-source tools allowing for deep, real-time remapping of every key and layer. The TH108 uses a proprietary web-based driver for remapping and macros.
Only the TH108 lists a specific silent switch option, the Sea Salt Silent Switch. The Split70 is listed with linear switches, and its vendor description does not mention a silent variant, though you could install silent switches into its hot-swap sockets.
The Split70 is specifically designed for ergonomic comfort. Its split layout allows you to position each half to align with your shoulders, promoting a more natural typing posture that can help alleviate tension in the wrists, arms, and shoulders during long sessions.
The Split70 includes a USB A-to-C cable, a USB C-to-C cable for connecting halves, a 2-in-1 puller, three extra switches, three Mac keycaps, and a manual. The TH108 includes a USB A-to-C cable, a 2-in-1 puller, two extra switches, a 2.4GHz receiver, and a manual.
Both use PBT keycaps in a Cherry profile, which are more durable than ABS. The TH108's keycaps are made with a double-shot technique, while the Split70's use dye sublimation. Both methods produce durable legends, with double-shot often allowing for backlit shine-through.
Yes, both keyboards list Mac compatibility. The Split70 specifically includes three Mac modifier keycaps (Command, Option) in the box to replace the Windows keys, making the transition easier.
Both use a gasket mount structure with five layers of sound dampening, but the materials differ. The Split70 uses sandwiched latex, IXPE switch pad, PET sound-enhancement pad, bottom sponge, and bottom silicone. The TH108 uses PORON sandwich foam, IXPE switch pad, sound-enhancement PET, PORON switch socket foam, and bottom silicone.
Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4GHz modes. The manufacturer-listed latency is very close: 3ms (wired) for the Split70 vs 2ms for the TH108, and 5ms (2.4GHz) for both. In practice, this difference is negligible for most users.
Yes, the TH108 is a full-size keyboard measuring 445mm in length and weighing 1200g. The Split70, when its two halves are placed together, has a total length of approximately 372mm and weighs 890g, making it more compact and lighter.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.











