
This comparison is for users seeking a compact mechanical keyboard from Epomaker but are torn between ergonomic design and extreme portability. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize a split layout for comfort and a 70% key count, or an ultra-minimalist 40% layout for travel and desk space. Both offer similar core features like gasket mounts, VIA programmability, and tri-mode connectivity, making the layout and ergonomics the primary differentiators.
87 Overall/ Value 86.6Build Quality 77.0Customizability 92.3Performance 78.0Productivity 92.6Portability 88.8![]() | -10% off 82 Overall/ Value 81.6Build Quality 75.4Customizability 86.1Performance 73.8Productivity 62.5Portability 84.2![]() | Select a keyboard to compare |
3.6 stars (9 reviews) | 3.9 stars (52 reviews) | |
|
| |
Scores
| Scores
| |
Name Epomaker Split70 | Name Epomaker TH40 | |
Release year 2025 | Release year 2024 | |
Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear | |
Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | |
Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | |
Layout Size Other | Layout Size 40% | |
Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | |
Layout Ergonomics Split | Layout Ergonomics Split Spacebar | |
Knob Support | Knob Support | |
Display Support | Display Support | |
Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | |
Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | |
USB-C | USB-C | |
USB passthrough | USB passthrough | |
Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | |
Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | |
Battery capacity 3000 mAh | Battery capacity 3000 mAh | |
Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | |
QMK Support | QMK Support | |
VIA Support | VIA Support | |
VIAL Support | VIAL Support | |
N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | |
Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | |
Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | |
Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | |
Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | |
Backlight Rgb, South-face | Backlight Rgb, South-face | |
Case Colors | Case Colors | |
Case Material ABS | Case Material ABS | |
Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | |
Dimensions 40 x 118 x 372 mm | Dimensions 35 x 258 x 97 mm | |
Weight 890g | Weight 500g |
Your primary need dictates the choice. If ergonomic comfort for long typing sessions and a more traditional key layout are paramount, the Epomaker Split70 is the clear recommendation. If your goal is maximum portability, minimal desk footprint, and you are comfortable mastering layers for every keypress, the Epomaker TH40 offers a compelling, more affordable package. Both share excellent core features like VIA programmability and tri-mode connectivity.
The Split70 is the more versatile choice for general productivity, gaming, and content creation due to its more complete key layout and ergonomic split design. The TH40 excels specifically in portability and minimalism, winning for travel. For programming, the choice is a tie and depends entirely on the user's preference for a layered, ultra-compact layout versus one with more readily available keys. Both are strong candidates for modding, with the Split70 having a slight edge due to its detailed sound-dampening construction.
You might also like similar products in that price range: