Epomaker Split70 vs AULA EA75 MaxSplit Ergo vs Compact Screen
Choose the Split70 for ergonomic comfort and deep customization, or the EA75 Max for a more affordable, compact layout with a built-in screen.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.0 (15)4.0 · 15 reviews
from$98at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.8 (16)4.8 · 16 reviews
from$67at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Split70
Split Ergo
- Unique split ergonomic 70% layout designed to reduce arm and shoulder strain.
- Extensive firmware support via both QMK and VIA for deep key remapping and macros.
- Includes five detailed sound-dampening layers for a premium typing sound.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
AULA EA75 Max
Compact Screen
Build quality in the top 45% of 75% boards under $100.
- Features a customizable TFT screen for displaying time, battery, GIFs, and system status.
- Larger 5000mAh battery for potentially longer wireless operation.
- More affordable price point for a feature-rich 75% keyboard.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No numpad.
Select the Epomaker Split70 if your priority is long-term typing comfort, ergonomic health, and you value extensive programmability through QMK/VIA. Opt for the Epomaker EA75 Max if you prefer a more traditional, compact layout, want the utility and visual appeal of a TFT screen, and are seeking a keyboard with strong battery life at a lower cost. The core trade-off is ergonomic design versus mainstream convenience with a screen.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Split70
AULA EA75 Max
Battery
3,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Ergonomics
Split
Standard
Switch options
Linear
Linear, Silent
Display
None
TFT
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
890 g
958.5 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- Epomaker Split70
- AULA EA75 Max
- Performance
- 7878
- Build quality
- 7868
- Productivity
- 9383
- Customizability
- 9173
- Portability
- 8879
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Case material: ABS
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
What will you mostly use it for?
The Split70 is the clear choice for ergonomics and deep customization, winning in Office and Programming use cases and being superior for Modding. The EA75 Max appeals to users who prioritize a familiar compact layout, a visual screen, and strong battery life, making it better for Gaming, Travel, and Content Creation. Your primary need for comfort versus conventional features dictates the winner.
Pick the AULA EA75 Max
- The EA75 Max has a lower reported latency of 1-8ms in wired/2.4G modes, compared to the Split70's 3ms/5ms.
- Its traditional 75% layout with dedicated arrow keys is more familiar for gaming keybinds and posture.
- The Split70's split layout may require an adjustment period for gaming hand positioning.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Split70
15 owner reviews
“Check out my full review - https://dezdoes.com/epomaker-split-70-the-learning-curve-and-triumph-of-split-ergonomics/”
“i bet its a great product but i never got it because there was an issue with the destination info.. im kinda down eighty bucks and a keyboard.. im working my butt off so i can try to get a new one”
AULA EA75 Max
16 owner reviews
“The only bad thing is that the software is pretty hard to found, I don’t even know if it’s out there actually, anyways the product fantastic, the switches are smooth and lubed and the quality of the product is excellent”
“Good switches, nice keycaps. Shitty outsated driver. Some rgb doesn’t change even when using its own setting, doesn’t work with signalRGB. Sometimes when I turn on my pc the keyboard glitches and i have to switch to and from wireless mode for it to work…”
Epomaker Split70 vs AULA EA75 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 26 specs differ
Epomaker Split70
AULA EA75 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Split70 vs AULA EA75 Max: your questions
The Epomaker Split70 is specifically designed for this purpose. Its split layout allows you to position each half to match your natural shoulder width, promoting a neutral arm and wrist posture to help alleviate tension during extended typing, as highlighted in its product description.
The manufacturer's description states the TFT screen can display time, keyboard battery life, connectivity status, operating modes, and custom GIFs. There is no mention of it displaying real-time PC system metrics like CPU or GPU usage from the computer.
Yes. The Split70 halves can be linked together with the included USB C-to-C cable to function as a single, fixed unit, though it will retain its distinctive split key layout and spacing.
The Split70 supports the open-source VIA and QMK firmware, which allows for real-time, software-free key remapping stored on the keyboard itself. The EA75 Max uses proprietary driver software for customization, which according to a user review, can be harder to find.
The EA75 Max has a larger 5000mAh battery, while the Split70 has a 3000mAh battery. Epomaker lists the Split70's battery life as up to 11 hours with RGB on and 260 hours with it off. Specific runtime for the EA75 Max is not provided, but its larger capacity suggests longer potential life.
Both list Mac support. However, a key difference is that the Split70 includes Mac modifier keycaps (Command, Option) in the box, while the EA75 Max specifications note that Mac modifier keycaps are not included.
Yes, both the Split70 and EA75 Max are hot-swappable, supporting both 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches. They include a switch puller tool for this purpose.
The EA75 Max is likely more convenient for travel due to its single, unified 75% chassis. The Split70, while its halves are separate, requires managing two pieces and a connecting cable, making setup and packing slightly more complex.
Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4GHz wireless modes for responsive input. The EA75 Max lists a latency of 1-8ms in these modes, while the Split70 lists 3ms (wired) and 5ms (2.4GHz).
Both use a gasket mount and five layers of sound-dampening foam. The Split70's layers are named as Sandwiched Latex, IXPE Switch Pad, PET Sound-Enhancement Pad, Bottom Sponge, and Bottom Silicone. The EA75 Max lists Sandwich Pad, Switch Pad, Sound-Enhancement pad, Bottom Foam, and Bottom Pad.
The EA75 Max offers a silent linear switch option called Cotton Candy, which is specifically designed to reduce typing noise. This makes it a suitable choice for shared or quiet workspaces where noise is a concern.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.