
This comparison is for buyers deciding between Epomaker's ergonomic and traditional offerings. The choice is difficult because both keyboards share core features like tri-mode connectivity, gasket mounts, and hot-swappable switches, but diverge completely in form and function. The Split70 prioritizes a split layout for comfort, while the F108 Pro offers a full-size layout with a dedicated screen and numpad. Your decision hinges on whether ergonomics or a complete key set is more critical for your workflow.
87 Overall/ Value 86.6Build Quality 77.1Customizability 92.4Performance 77.9Productivity 92.7Portability 88.8![]() | -10% off 75 Overall/ Value 74.6Build Quality 68.4Customizability 72.6Performance 78.0Productivity 73.5Portability 59.2![]() | Select a keyboard to compare |
3.6 stars (9 reviews) | 4.7 stars (23 reviews) | |
|
| |
Scores
| Scores
| |
Name Epomaker Split70 | Name Epomaker F108 Pro | |
Release year 2025 | Release year 2026 | |
Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear, Silent | |
Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | |
Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | |
Layout Size Other | Layout Size 100% | |
Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | |
Layout Ergonomics Split | Layout Ergonomics Normal | |
Knob Support | Knob Support | |
Display Support | Display Support LCD | |
Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | |
Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | |
USB-C | USB-C | |
USB passthrough | USB passthrough | |
Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | |
Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | |
Battery capacity 3000 mAh | Battery capacity 8000 mAh | |
Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | |
QMK Support | QMK Support | |
VIA Support | VIA Support | |
VIAL Support | VIAL Support | |
N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | |
Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | |
Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | |
Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | |
Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | |
Backlight Rgb, South-face | Backlight Rgb, South-face | |
Case Colors | Case Colors | |
Case Material ABS | Case Material ABS | |
Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | |
Dimensions 40 x 118 x 372 mm | Dimensions 43 x 445 x 142 mm | |
Weight 890g | Weight 1200g |
Your primary need dictates the choice. If you want to improve typing posture and have deep control over your keyboard's firmware, the Epomaker Split70 is the clear option. If you require a full numpad, value a built-in screen for information or customization, and prioritize maximum battery life, the Epomaker F108 Pro is the better fit. Both are competitively priced wireless keyboards with gasket mounts, so the decision rests on layout philosophy.
The Split70 wins for programming, travel, and modding due to its ergonomic split design, lighter weight, and superior firmware support. The F108 Pro is better suited for office work and content creation, where its numpad, screen, and larger battery are major advantages. For gaming, the choice is neutral, depending on whether you prioritize ergonomic comfort or a traditional layout.
You might also like similar products in that price range: