Epomaker Split70 vs Keychron V1 MaxSplit Ergonomics vs 75% Layout
Choose the Epomaker Split70 for ergonomic comfort and split typing, or the Keychron V1 Max for a more traditional compact layout with broader layout support.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Split70
Split Ergonomics
- Unique split 70% ergonomic layout designed to reduce arm and shoulder tension.
- Includes a programmable knob for media control and other functions.
- Features a detailed 5-layer sound dampening system including latex, IXPE, and PET pads.
- Heavier at 890g and requires managing two separate halves.
- Uses plate-mounted stabilizers, which are generally less favored than screw-in types for modding.
- Limited to a linear switch option (Wisteria Linear V2) in the provided configuration.
Get the
Keychron V1 Max
75% Layout
- Offers extensive ISO layout support (UK, DE, Nordic, French, Spanish, etc.).
- Available in both fully assembled and barebones kit versions.
- Includes higher-end screw-in PCB stabilizers.
- Traditional non-ergonomic (normal) layout does not address typing posture like a split board.
- The manufacturer's description mentions key chatter issues in at least one user review.
- Does not include the specific multi-layer foam detailing described for the Split70.
Your primary need dictates the choice. For ergonomic health, posture improvement, and a dedicated split typing experience, the Epomaker Split70 is the specialized tool. For a versatile, compact daily driver with exceptional layout compatibility, modding potential, and a more traditional form factor, the Keychron V1 Max is the stronger all-rounder. Consider how much you value the split design versus the convenience and support of a standard layout.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Split70
Keychron V1 Max
Battery
3,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
Ergonomics
Split
Standard
Case material
ABS
ABS, Plastic
Switch options
Linear
Clicky, Linear, Tactile
Mount style
Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount, Plate Mount
- Epomaker Split70
- Keychron V1 Max
- Performance
- 7883
- Build quality
- 7786
- Productivity
- 9397
- Customizability
- 9198
- Portability
- 8979
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Knob
- QMK
- VIA
What will you mostly use it for?
The Keychron V1 Max wins in more categories, particularly for programming due to its ISO layout support, for travel due to its lighter weight and single-unit design, and for modding with its barebones kit option and screw-in stabilizers. The Epomaker Split70 is the clear choice for content creators and anyone prioritizing ergonomic comfort, thanks to its split design. For gaming and office use, the decision is closer, leaning towards the V1 Max for gaming and being a tie for general office work.
Pick the Keychron V1 Max
- The Keychron V1 Max has a more traditional 75% layout that may be more familiar for gaming keybinds.
- Its listed polling rate is 1000 Hz in both 2.4 GHz and wired modes, matching the Split70's wired/2.4G performance.
- The V1 Max includes screw-in PCB stabilizers, which can contribute to a more consistent feel on large keys.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Split70
15 owner reviews
“Check out my full review - https://dezdoes.com/epomaker-split-70-the-learning-curve-and-triumph-of-split-ergonomics/”
“i bet its a great product but i never got it because there was an issue with the destination info.. im kinda down eighty bucks and a keyboard.. im working my butt off so i can try to get a new one”
Keychron V1 Max
18 owner reviews
“Feels great, haven't got a new KB since my Novatouch. Great high end features and feel, DSA caps on it feel good.”
“The dongle does not work after 6 months of using it and they want me to pay to fix it. If you want to buy a keyboard that is good don’t go for keycron”
Epomaker Split70 vs Keychron V1 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
12 of 27 specs differ
Epomaker Split70
Keychron V1 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Epomaker Split70 vs Keychron V1 Max: your questions
The Epomaker Split70 is specifically designed to address this. Its split layout allows you to position each half to align with your natural shoulder width, reducing strain on the wrists, arms, and shoulders during extended typing. The Keychron V1 Max uses a standard, non-split layout which does not offer the same ergonomic positioning benefits.
Yes, the Epomaker Split70 halves can be connected together with the included USB C-to-C cable to form a unified 70% layout keyboard. This provides flexibility to use it as a standard keyboard or separated for ergonomic typing, as noted in the product description.
Yes, the Keychron V1 Max is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux. It includes a system toggle and an additional set of customized keycaps for both Windows and macOS systems, allowing you to save separate layouts for each.
Based on manufacturer specifications, the Keychron V1 Max has a larger 4000mAh battery compared to the Split70's 3000mAh. Keychron claims up to 190 hours of use with backlight off, while Epomaker claims 260 hours for the Split70 with backlight off. Actual results will vary with usage.
Yes, both the Epomaker Split70 and the Keychron V1 Max feature hot-swappable PCBs. This allows you to change mechanical switches without soldering. The V1 Max supports both 3-pin and 5-pin MX-style switches.
Both keyboards support open-source QMK and VIA firmware for key remapping and macro programming. The Keychron V1 Max also offers the web-based Keychron Launcher tool for configuration without needing installed software.
The Keychron V1 Max is likely more convenient for travel. It is a single, lighter unit (770g vs 890g) with a compact 75% footprint. The Epomaker Split70, while portable, consists of two separate halves that need to be packed and connected.
The provided vendor description for the Keychron V1 Max lists 'Knob Support' and 'Fully Assembled Knob' as a configuration option, indicating that a knob version is available. You should verify the specific product listing for the model you are purchasing.
The Epomaker Split70 comes with dye-sublimated PBT keycaps in a Cherry profile. The Keychron V1 Max (fully assembled) comes with double-shot PBT keycaps in an OSA profile, which the manufacturer describes as having OEM height with an SA-like shape.
Yes, the Keychron V1 Max is offered in a 'Barebone Knob' version. This kit includes the ABS plastic case, PCB with screw-in stabilizers, and PC plate, but does not include keycaps or switches, allowing for complete customization.
For a low-latency connection, both keyboards offer a 1000 Hz polling rate in their 2.4 GHz wireless mode. The Epomaker Split70 specifies a 5ms latency in 2.4G mode, while the Keychron V1 Max states its 1000 Hz rate makes latency 'hardly noticeable.'
The Epomaker Split70's description details a specific 5-layer sound dampening system including sandwiched latex, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound-enhancement pad, bottom sponge, and bottom silicone. The Keychron V1 Max listing mentions 'sound absorbing foam' but does not specify the number or types of layers.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.