Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 28, 2026

Epomaker TH40 vs Meletrix Zoom65 V3

Choose the TH40 for its 40% footprint and lighter ABS build, or the Zoom65 V3 for its 65% layout, aluminum case, and wider mounting and plate choices.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker TH40

Build quality in the top 30% of 40% boards under $150.

If you want

  • 40% ANSI layout with a split spacebar.
  • Tri-mode connection via Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, or wired.
  • Gasket mount, polycarbonate plate, and ABS case.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Get the

Meletrix Zoom65 V3

Knob

Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $200.

If you want

  • 65% ANSI or ISO layout with an LCD and knob support.
  • Aluminum and plastic case materials, plus several listed plate choices.
  • Supports seven mounting systems according to the vendor description.

Rules this board out

  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Bottom line

Pick the Epomaker TH40 if minimizing keyboard size and weight is the priority, and you are comfortable using layers instead of dedicated arrow keys and a function row. Choose the Meletrix Zoom65 V3 if you want a larger key layout and more room to tailor the build through its plate and mounting options. Both offer wireless connectivity, hot-swapping, QMK, and VIA, so the layout and build flexibility are the deciding factors.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker TH40

Meletrix Zoom65 V3

  • Layout size

    40%

    65%

  • Ergonomics

    Split Spacebar

    Standard

  • Case material

    ABS

    Aluminum, Plastic

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    PCB Mount, Plate Mount, Sandwich Mount, Top Mount

  • Knob

    No

    Yes

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker TH40
  • Meletrix Zoom65 V3
Performance
74
68
Build quality
76
92
Productivity
62
94
Customizability
86
98
Portability
84
87

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
  • QMK
  • VIA
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The TH40 has the clearer travel and compact-desk case, while the Zoom65 V3 suits users who want more keys and physical customization options. The Zoom65 V3 edges office, programming, modding, and content creation because of its 65% layout and additional listed features. Gaming is close because both have a 1000 Hz polling rate and three connection modes, with the TH40 explicitly listing N-Key Rollover. Consider whether the TH40's missing dedicated arrows and function row fit your workflow before choosing its smaller footprint.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker TH40

  • Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity.
  • The TH40 specifies N-Key Rollover, while the Zoom65 V3's listed features do not specify rollover.
  • The TH40's 40% layout omits dedicated arrow keys, which may be a drawback for games that use them.

Full specs

Epomaker TH40 vs Meletrix Zoom65 V3 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

13 of 25 specs differ

Epomaker TH40

Meletrix Zoom65 V3

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear
—

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
PCB Mount, Plate Mount, Sandwich Mount, Top Mount

Sound dampening

No
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

40%
65%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI, ISO

Ergonomics

Split Spacebar
Standard

Knob

No
Yes

Display

None
LCD

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
1,000 Hz

Battery

3,000 mAh
—

USB-C

No
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

ABS
Aluminum, Plastic

Plate material

Plastic, Polycarbonate
Aluminum, Brass, CarbonFiber, FR4, Plastic, Polycarbonate, POM

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

500 g
—

Dimensions

35 x 258 x 97 mm
—

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

QMK

Yes
Yes

VIA

Yes
Yes

N-key rollover

Yes
No

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2024
2024

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

Epomaker TH40

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Meletrix Zoom65 V3

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker TH40 vs Meletrix Zoom65 V3: your questions

Yes. The TH40 is a 40% keyboard measuring 35 x 258 x 97 mm and weighing 500 g, while the Zoom65 V3 has a 65% layout. The TH40 is the more compact option based on layout and its listed dimensions.

The Zoom65 V3 is a 65% layout, but its listed compatibility rule only specifies that it lacks a function row and numpad. The TH40's compact-layout rule explicitly says it has no dedicated arrow keys.

Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless connectivity, as well as wired use. The TH40 vendor description identifies USB-C as its wired connection.

The Zoom65 V3 lists both ANSI and ISO layout standards. The TH40 is ANSI, and its compatibility rules say ISO variants such as ISO-DE and UK are not offered.

Both keyboards list QMK and VIA support. The TH40 vendor description additionally specifies four switchable layers, three of which are programmable in VIA.

The Zoom65 V3 is the more straightforward fit if you want a 65% layout, since the TH40 is a 40% board without dedicated arrow keys or a function row. Both support QMK, VIA, and hot-swappable switches.

Both list hot-swappable support. The TH40 vendor description specifies a 3/5-pin hot-swap PCB, while the Zoom65 V3 vendor description identifies its PCB as hot-swap.

The TH40 has an ABS case, a plastic and polycarbonate plate, and PBT keycaps. The Zoom65 V3 lists aluminum and plastic case materials, several plate options, and PBT keycaps.

The vendor description says switches are not included with any option, and keycaps are included only with barebones bundle options. Check the selected bundle's contents before ordering.

Yes, the TH40 lists RGB with south-facing LEDs. Its compatibility rules warn that shine-through legends stay dark and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LEDs.

The Zoom65 V3 lists seven mounting systems and multiple plate material options, offering more specified build choices. The TH40 has a gasket mount and polycarbonate plate.

The TH40 lists a 3000 mAh battery. No battery capacity is given for the Zoom65 V3 in its product specifications here.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.