Evoworks Evo80 vs Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION
Choose the Evo80 for per-key RGB and 2.4 GHz wireless, or the ZOOM TKL for its split layout and gasket mount.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.9 (60)4.9 · 60 reviews
from$169at Divinikey
No reviews
from$159at Meletrix
Which one should you get?
Get the
Evoworks Evo80
Battery
Build quality in the top 15% of 80% boards under $200.
- Wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity, with a 1000 Hz polling rate specified for wired and 2.4 GHz modes.
- Per-key south-facing RGB lighting.
- 8000mAh battery.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION
Build quality in the top 10% of 80% boards under $200.
- Gasket mount with aluminum and plastic case materials.
- Split Backspace and split Spacebar layout options.
- 5° typing angle and 1580 g listed weight.
Pick the Evoworks Evo80 if you want per-key RGB, 2.4 GHz wireless, and its larger battery, and check that your keycaps suit south-facing LEDs. Choose the Meletrix ZOOM TKL Essential Edition if its split layout, gasket mount, and lower listed weight matter more. Both provide hot-swap support, VIA, and a 1000 Hz polling rate.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Evoworks Evo80
Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, Wired
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Battery
8,000 mAh
2,250 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Ergonomics
Standard
Split Backspace, Split Spacebar
Case material
Aluminum, Copper
Aluminum, Plastic
Mount style
Plate Mount
Gasket Mount
- Evoworks Evo80
- Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION
- Performance
- 7752
- Build quality
- 8082
- Productivity
- 8482
- Customizability
- 8262
- Portability
- 8773
- Layout size: 80%
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Evo80 is the more feature-oriented pick for gaming, programming, modding, and RGB-focused desk setups. The ZOOM TKL has a clearer office case if its split layout and 5° typing angle suit your preferences. For travel, the ZOOM TKL is lighter, while the Evo80 has the larger battery and a vendor-listed carrying case, so the priority matters. Both offer VIA, hot-swap support, and wired and Bluetooth connections.
Pick the Evoworks Evo80
- The Evo80 offers 2.4 GHz wireless in addition to wired and Bluetooth connections; the ZOOM TKL lists wired and Bluetooth.
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, and the Evo80 specifies that rate for wired and 2.4 GHz modes.
- The Evo80 has per-key RGB, while the ZOOM TKL has no RGB.
Evoworks Evo80 vs Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
12 of 23 specs differ
Evoworks Evo80
Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
Evoworks Evo80 vs Meletrix ZOOM TKL ESSENTIAL EDITION: your questions
Yes. Its listed connections are wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz, and the vendor specifies 1000 Hz polling in wired and 2.4 GHz modes. The ZOOM TKL lists wired and Bluetooth connections.
No, its metadata lists RGB as absent. The Evo80 has per-key RGB with south-facing LEDs.
The Evo80 lists an 8000mAh battery, compared with 2250mAh for the ZOOM TKL. Battery life is not specified here, so capacity alone does not establish runtime.
Yes, both list hot-swappable switches and VIA support. The Evo80 vendor listing also describes a hot-swap PCB.
The ZOOM TKL is listed at 1580 g, while the Evo80 is listed at 1870 g. Both vendor listings mention a carrying case or bag.
Yes, both list VIA support. The Evo80 vendor description also identifies it as programmable with VIA.
Both are 80% ANSI keyboards. The ZOOM TKL lists split Backspace and split Spacebar options, while the Evo80 vendor description identifies an 88-key TKL layout with an F13 key.
The Meletrix ZOOM TKL lists a gasket mount. The Evo80 uses a plate-mount switch arrangement in its metadata, while its vendor description separately describes a butterfly leaf spring mechanism with a gasket.
The Evo80 has south-facing LEDs, and its compatibility note says shine-through legends stay dark. It also warns that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LEDs.
The Evo80 metadata lists FR4, plastic, and polycarbonate plate materials. Its vendor description specifically names polypropylene or FR4 plate options.
The Meletrix vendor listing says the prebuilt includes WS Standard switches and WS doubleshot PBT keycaps. It also lists a PC plate and stock WS stabilizers.
The Evo80 is the direct fit if you want per-key RGB and 2.4 GHz wireless alongside Bluetooth and wired connections. The ZOOM TKL has no RGB and lists wired and Bluetooth connectivity.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.