Which one should you get?
Get the
Redragon HORUS K618
Full-Size
- Full-size 104-key layout with a dedicated numpad and navigation cluster.
- Includes 4x5 on-the-fly programmable macro keys.
- Offers a choice of clicky, tactile, or linear low-profile switches.
- Larger and heavier footprint (437mm wide, 725g) than the compact alternative.
- Keycap material is not specified, suggesting it may be standard ABS.
- Lacks the screw-in stabilizers preferred by keyboard enthusiasts.
Get the
Thunderobot K96
96% Layout
- Compact 96% layout saves desk space while retaining most keys.
- Equipped with PBT keycaps for better durability and texture.
- Includes a metallic volume and brightness control roller.
- Only offers linear switch type, with no tactile or clicky options.
- Compact layout may require adaptation for users accustomed to a numpad.
- White-only backlighting offers fewer color options than full RGB.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If you require a full numpad, dedicated macro keys, and switch variety for a traditional typing experience, the Redragon HORUS K618 is the logical pick. Opt for the Thunderobot K96 if you value a cleaner, more compact desk setup, prefer the feel of PBT keycaps, and want the convenience of a volume roller. Both share core features like tri-mode connectivity and low-profile designs at a similar cost.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Redragon HORUS K618
Thunderobot K96
Layout size
100%
96%
Switch options
Clicky, Linear, Tactile
Linear
Knob
No
Yes
Weight
725 g
636 g
Screw-in stabilizers
No
Yes
- Redragon HORUS K618
- Thunderobot K96
- Performance
- 7243
- Build quality
- 4440
- Productivity
- 4858
- Customizability
- 4452
- Portability
- 4847
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Battery: 1,900 mAh
- Low profile
- Case material: Plastic
What will you mostly use it for?
The Redragon HORUS K618 is the preferred choice for gaming, programming, and content creation where its full-size layout, numpad, and dedicated macro keys provide tangible benefits. The Thunderobot K96 wins for travel due to its smaller size and weight, and for modding thanks to its PBT keycaps and screw-in stabilizers. For general office use, both are competent with their low-profile designs and wireless options, making it a tie.
Pick the Redragon HORUS K618
- The HORUS K618 offers dedicated macro keys for on-the-fly programming.
- It provides a full-size layout with a dedicated numpad for MMO or simulation games.
- The vendor description highlights its software support for key remapping and RGB customization.
Redragon HORUS K618 vs Thunderobot K96 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 20 specs differ
Redragon HORUS K618
Thunderobot K96
Switch options
Mount style
Low profile
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Redragon HORUS K618 vs Thunderobot K96: your questions
The Thunderobot K96 is better for a small desk. It uses a 96% layout that is significantly more compact, measuring 360mm in width compared to the 437mm full-size layout of the Redragon HORUS K618.
The Thunderobot K96 does not have a dedicated numpad. Its 96% layout integrates the number keys into a compact block within the main key area to save space.
No. According to its specifications, the Thunderobot K96 is only listed with linear switch types. The Redragon HORUS K618 offers a choice of clicky, tactile, or linear low-profile switches.
The Thunderobot K96 comes with PBT keycaps, which are generally more durable and resistant to shine than ABS plastic. The keycap material for the Redragon HORUS K618 is not specified in the provided information.
Yes, both the Redragon HORUS K618 and Thunderobot K96 support tri-mode connectivity. This includes Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and a wired USB-C connection.
The Redragon HORUS K618 is better for macros. Its vendor description explicitly mentions it has 4x5 on-the-fly macro keys and supports software for key remapping and infinite keybindings.
The Redragon HORUS K618 listing mentions professional software support for RGB and key remapping. The Thunderobot K96 description lists 17 lighting effects but does not specify software for key remapping.
Both keyboards are equipped with a 1900mAh battery. The Redragon HORUS K618 vendor page claims up to 30 hours of use, but a specific runtime is not provided for the Thunderobot K96.
The Thunderobot K96 may be easier for modding enthusiasts. It features screw-in stabilizers, which are typically easier to tune and replace than clip-in stabilizers, and it uses PBT keycaps.
Yes, the Thunderobot K96 includes a stepless metallic roller for volume and backlight brightness control. The Redragon HORUS K618 has dedicated media keys but does not list a physical knob.
Neither the product specifications nor the vendor descriptions mention hot-swap sockets for either the Redragon HORUS K618 or the Thunderobot K96. They are listed as pre-built keyboards.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.












