Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 10, 2026

Velocifire Virtual 87 vs Manta80% vs 40% Layout Comparison

Choose the Virtual 87 for a full-featured TKL experience or the Manta for extreme portability and a unique 40% layout.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Velocifire Virtual 87

80%

Build quality in the top 10% of 80% boards at any price.

If you want

  • Offers multiple mounting styles (gasket, top, spring) for customizing typing feel.
  • Large 5000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
  • Includes practical accessories like a foam bag and a keyboard bag.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No numpad.

Get the

Velocifire Manta

40% Layout Comparison

Build quality in the top 35% of 40% boards under $300.

If you want

  • Extremely compact 40% layout for maximum portability and minimal desk footprint.
  • Includes a unique 4-way programmable joystick for customizable input.
  • Described as ultra-thin and lightweight in the vendor description.

Rules this board out

  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Bottom line

Your primary layout need dictates the choice. If you want a keyboard for general-purpose computing with a familiar layout, strong wireless battery life, and gaming features, the Velocifire Virtual 87 is the better investment. Opt for the Velocifire Manta only if you are specifically seeking the challenge and space-saving benefits of a 40% keyboard and value its programmable joystick over all else.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Velocifire Virtual 87

Velocifire Manta

  • Layout size

    80%

    40%

  • Battery

    5,000 mAh

    280 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    Sandwich Mount

  • Sound dampening

    No

    Yes

  • Layout standard

    ANSI, ISO

    ANSI

    ISO and JIS exist so regional layouts fit

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Velocifire Virtual 87
  • Velocifire Manta
Performance
72
54
Build quality
82
78
Productivity
77
71
Customizability
91
81
Portability
70
82

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Case material: Aluminum
  • QMK
  • VIA
  • Plate material: FR4
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Virtual 87 wins in most traditional computing scenarios like gaming, office work, and programming due to its standard TKL layout, high polling rate, and large battery. The Manta is the clear choice for travel and situations where desk space is at an absolute premium, leveraging its unique 40% form factor and joystick. For modding and content creation, the Virtual 87's flexible mounting and RGB lighting give it the edge.

For gaming

Pick the Velocifire Virtual 87

  • The Virtual 87 has a confirmed 1000 Hz wired polling rate for lower latency.
  • Its 80% layout retains dedicated arrow and function keys important for many games.
  • The gasket mount and included foam bag may offer a more consistent typing feel during long sessions.

Full specs

Velocifire Virtual 87 vs Manta specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

8 of 20 specs differ

Velocifire Virtual 87

Velocifire Manta

Typing & switches

Switch options

—
Clicky

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Sandwich Mount

Sound dampening

No
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

80%
40%

Layout standard

ANSI, ISO
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, Wired
Bluetooth, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

5,000 mAhBetter
280 mAh

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Aluminum

Plate material

FR4
FR4

Weight

1,700 g
—

Typing angle

6°
5°

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
None

Firmware & software

QMK

Yes
Yes

VIA

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2025

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

Velocifire Virtual 87

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Velocifire Manta

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

FAQ

Velocifire Virtual 87 vs Manta: your questions

The core difference is layout size. The Virtual 87 is an 80% (TKL) keyboard, missing only the numpad. The Manta is a 40% keyboard, which lacks dedicated number rows, function keys, and many punctuation keys, requiring heavy use of keyboard layers.

The Virtual 87 has a significantly larger 5000mAh battery. The Manta has a much smaller 280mAh battery. For long wireless usage sessions, the Virtual 87 is the clear winner.

Yes. Both the Virtual 87 and the Manta are listed as supporting QMK and VIA. This means you can fully reprogram the keys and layers using these popular, open-source tools.

Yes, both kits feature hot-swappable PCBs, allowing you to change switches without soldering. The Manta's description specifies it supports Gateron cross-axis low-profile switches.

The Virtual 87 has a 6-degree typing angle and includes foam for sound dampening, which may improve acoustics. The Manta has a 5-degree angle and uses a sandwich mount with sound dampening. Comfort is subjective, but the Virtual 87's standard layout may be easier for most typists.

Yes, according to the vendor description, the Manta includes a '4-way programmable joystick' that also supports a press function, effectively giving you five customizable inputs.

The Virtual 87 is listed at 1700g (1.7kg), which is quite heavy. The Manta's weight is not specified in the provided data, but its description emphasizes it is 'lightweight' and 'ultra-thin,' suggesting it is significantly lighter.

The Virtual 87 kit includes the case, PCB, plate, a foam bag, and a keyboard bag. The Manta kit includes the aluminum shell, FR4 plate, hot-swap PCB, finished rocker (joystick), and a 280mAh battery.

Yes. Both the Virtual 87 and the Manta use aluminum for their cases. The Virtual 87 description specifies 6063 aluminum, and the Manta is described as having a 'full CNC anodized aluminum housing.'

The Virtual 87 is more beginner-friendly due to its standard 80% layout, which requires less adaptation. The Manta's 40% layout has a steep learning curve, as you must memorize layers for basic functions like typing numbers.

The Manta's vendor description includes a warning that XDA height keycaps may touch the positioning plate due to their lower bottom. This suggests compatibility with low-profile keycaps may be limited or require careful selection.

Both keyboards list Bluetooth as a connectivity option. The Virtual 87 vendor description specifies a 124 Hz polling rate for its Bluetooth mode.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.