Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 30, 2026

KBDFans Agar vs Qwertykeys Neo6560% vs 65%

Choose the KBDFans Agar for its 60% layout, RGB, and silicone block mount, or the Qwertykeys Neo65 for its 65% layout and explicit ISO support.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

KBDFans Agar

60%

Build quality in the top 5% of 60% boards under $150.

If you want

  • RGB lighting is listed in the Agar metadata, with the vendor noting that underglow is most visible with polycarbonate cases.
  • The vendor describes a silicone block mount system intended to provide a flexible typing feel.
  • VIA and VIAL support are listed in the metadata.

Rules this board out

  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Get the

Qwertykeys Neo65

65%

Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $150.

If you want

  • Supports ANSI and ISO layouts according to the vendor description.
  • Connectivity includes Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired USB-C.
  • The vendor lists a dual mounting design with PCB gasket and isolated top mount options.

Rules this board out

  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Bottom line

Choose the KBDFans Agar if you want a 60% board with RGB, the vendor-described silicone block mount, and metadata-listed VIAL support. Choose the Qwertykeys Neo65 if ISO support, a 65% layout, or its listed Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz options matter more. Check the Agar's compact-layout limitation and the Neo65's lack of a function row and numpad before buying.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

KBDFans Agar

Qwertykeys Neo65

  • Layout size

    60%

    65%

  • Connection

    Bluetooth, Wired

    Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

    Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency

  • Ergonomics

    Split Backspace

    Standard

  • Case material

    Aluminum, Polycarbonate

    Aluminum, Brass, Copper

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount, Plate Mount

    PCB Mount

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • KBDFans Agar
  • Qwertykeys Neo65
Performance
63
57
Build quality
90
87
Productivity
81
62
Customizability
90
68
Portability
84
85

What they share

  • Hot-swappable
  • Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
  • VIA
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Agar is a stronger fit for buyers who value RGB, its programming-oriented HHKB description, or the additional VIAL support. The Neo65 is the more flexible layout choice for ISO users and those wanting a 65% board with listed Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz options. Gaming is a trade-off: both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, while only the Agar lists RGB and only the Neo65 lists N-key rollover. Both support VIA, hot-swapping, and USB-C.

For gaming

Pick the KBDFans Agar

  • Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, so that specification does not separate them.
  • The Agar has RGB, while the Neo65 listing specifies no RGB.
  • The Neo65 includes N-key rollover, a feature not listed for the Agar.

Full specs

KBDFans Agar vs Qwertykeys Neo65 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

15 of 23 specs differ

KBDFans Agar

Qwertykeys Neo65

Typing & switches

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount, Plate Mount
PCB Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

60%
65%

Layout standard

ANSI, Dvorak
ANSI, ISO

Ergonomics

Split Backspace
Standard

Display

LED
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
1,000 Hz

Battery

—
2,200 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum, Polycarbonate
Aluminum, Brass, Copper

Plate material

Aluminum, Polycarbonate
Aluminum, CarbonFiber, Plastic, Polycarbonate

Keycaps

PBT
—

Weight

1,300 g
2,500 g

Dimensions

15 x 297 x 123 mm
19 x 292 x 109 mm

Typing angle

9°
8°

Backlight

RGB
None

Firmware & software

VIA

Yes
Yes

VIAL

Yes
No

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2025

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

KBDFans Agar

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Qwertykeys Neo65

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

KBDFans Agar7 stores

FAQ

KBDFans Agar vs Qwertykeys Neo65: your questions

The Agar is a 60% keyboard, while the Neo65 is a 65% keyboard. Their listed dimensions are 15 x 297 x 123 mm for the Agar and 19 x 292 x 109 mm for the Neo65.

No. The Agar compatibility rules specify that ISO layouts, including ISO-DE and UK variants, are not offered.

Yes, the Neo65 vendor description says its PCB supports ANSI and ISO. This is a key distinction from the Agar, which is listed as having no ISO layout.

The Neo65 explicitly lists Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, as well as wired USB-C. The Agar metadata lists Bluetooth, wired, and wireless connectivity, but also includes a wired-only entry, so confirm the specific configuration before purchasing.

Yes, hot-swapping is listed for both keyboards. The Agar vendor also specifies a 1.6mm non-flex-cut hot-swap PCB, while the Neo65 vendor describes both solder and hot-swap PCB options.

The Agar lists RGB, and its vendor description specifically mentions underglow that is most visible with polycarbonate cases. The Neo65 vendor description says it has no per-key RGB, and its metadata lists RGB as absent.

Yes, VIA support is listed for both the Agar and the Neo65. The Agar metadata also lists VIAL support.

The Agar vendor describes its HHKB layout as suited to programmers, and its metadata lists split backspace and VIAL support. The Neo65 offers ANSI and ISO layouts, which may better suit someone who specifically needs ISO.

The vendor lists a case, copper external weight, silicone gasket set, rubber feet, hot-swap PCB, daughterboard, hotswap foam kit, aluminum plate, and barebone hook. The vendor also states that switches, keycaps, and stabilizers are not included.

The vendor lists the case, weight, PCB, plate, daughterboard and connectors, foam kit, gaskets, rubber feet, and backup screws. The listed free gifts include a carrying case, keycap and switch puller, screwdriver, stabilizers, and USB-C cable.

Neither has a numpad, and neither has a function row, according to their compatibility rules. The Agar is 60% and also lacks dedicated arrow keys; the Neo65 is 65%.

The Neo65 vendor lists carbon fiber, aluminum, polycarbonate, and PP plates. The Agar metadata lists aluminum and polycarbonate plates, while its vendor description identifies an aluminum plate for the barebones kit.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.