Compare Leopold FC750RBT vs FC750RBT V2 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between Leopold's established wireless TKL and its updated successor. The decision is nuanced, as both share a core tenkeyless form factor, dual connectivity, and high-quality PBT keycaps. The V2 introduces internal changes like an aluminum plate and extra foam, while the original offers a different battery solution and a slightly lower cost. This guide breaks down where each model's specific upgrades matter most.

Model
			Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2023 Compatible with both Mac and Windows Equipped with a 2000 mAh battery Made with a Plastic, ABS case Offers No RGB lighting	Released in 2024 Made with a ABS case Offers Yes, North-face RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 58 Build Quality: 48.7 Productivity: 69.7 Customizability: 46.7 Portability: 72.4	Scores Performance: 64.9 Build Quality: 48.9 Productivity: 57 Customizability: 46.9 Portability: 67.5
Name	Name Leopold FC750RBT	Name Leopold FC750RBT V2
Release year	Release year 2023	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Clicky, Tactile, Linear, Silent	Switch Options Clicky, Tactile, Linear, Silent
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 80%	Layout Size 80%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 2000 mAh	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Plate Mount	Mount Style Plate Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight	Backlight North-face
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Plastic, ABS	Case Material ABS
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions -	Dimensions -
Weight	Weight -	Weight -

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your choice hinges on what you value more in an update. The FC750RBT V2 justifies its cost with tangible hardware upgrades: a metal plate, extra foam, and newer switches for a potentially refined typing experience. The original FC750RBT remains a compelling, slightly more affordable option with a pragmatic battery system and proven cross-platform support. Prioritize internal construction and switch feel for the V2, or battery convenience and cost for the original.

Leopold FC750RBT

+Uses two standard AAA batteries for wireless power, included.
+Features a 3-way cord channel for left, right, or center cable exit.
+Product listing explicitly confirms Mac, Windows, and Linux compatibility.
+Includes a sound absorbing pad for dampened acoustics.
+Available at a slightly lower price point than the V2.

−Lacks the additional acoustic foam and updated internal design of the V2.
−Comes with the previous generation of Cherry MX switches, not the newer MX2A line.
−Plate material is plastic, not aluminum.

Leopold FC750RBT V2

+Features an aluminum plate and an FR4 dual-layer PCB design.
+Includes both a sound absorbing pad and foam for enhanced acoustics.
+Comes installed with the newer Cherry MX2A line of switches.
+Includes north-facing RGB lighting for underglow effects.
+Offers a wider selection of switch types including MX2A Black and Speed Silver.

−Wireless mode requires three AAA batteries, which is less common than two.
−The product listing does not explicitly mention Mac or Linux compatibility, only Windows.
−Typically carries a higher price than the original model.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The V2 pulls ahead for gaming and modding due to its updated internal construction and switches. The original FC750RBT is more practical for office and travel, thanks to its simpler two-battery design and explicit Mac support. For programming and content creation, the keyboards are evenly matched on core layout and features, making switch preference the deciding factor.

GamingLeopold FC750RBT V2

•The V2's aluminum plate may offer a more consistent typing feel.
•It features the newer Cherry MX2A switch generation, which a reviewer noted for more precise feedback.
•North-facing RGB, while not backlit keycaps, is present for underglow effects.

OfficeLeopold FC750RBT

•Uses two AAA batteries, which are often easier to find and replace quickly than the V2's three.
•The product listing explicitly mentions Mac and Windows support.
•Lower typical price point can be an advantage for workplace procurement.

ProgrammingTie

•Both offer the same 87-key TKL layout with dedicated function keys.
•Both feature PBT double-shot keycaps for long-term legend durability.
•Both include dip switches for customizing certain key functions, useful for remapping.

TravelLeopold FC750RBT

•Runs on two AAA batteries, a common standard that is easy to source while traveling.
•The vendor description highlights a 3-way cord channel for flexible cable routing in wired mode.
•Slightly lower weight potential due to a plastic plate versus the V2's aluminum plate.

ModdingLeopold FC750RBT V2

•The V2 features an aluminum plate and an FR4 dual-layer PCB, which can influence acoustics.
•It includes both a sound-absorbing pad and foam, according to the manufacturer.
•North-facing switch orientation is specified, which is relevant for aftermarket keycap compatibility.

Content CreationTie

•Both keyboards offer multimedia controls via the function row.
•Both have N-key rollover for reliable simultaneous key presses.
•The choice between classic Cherry MX and updated MX2A switches comes down to personal preference for feel.