Neo Neo60 Cu vs Qwertykeys Neo6560% vs 65% Layout & Mounting Style Comparison
Choose the Neo60 Cu for its smaller 60% form factor and gasket mount, or the Neo65 for its dedicated arrow keys, wider material selection, and lower cost.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 (8)5.0 · 8 reviews
from$125at Divinikey
Which one should you get?
Get the
Neo Neo60 Cu
60%
Build quality in the top 50% of 60% boards under $300.
- More compact 60% form factor for maximum desk space savings.
- Gasket mount design for a potentially softer, more cushioned typing feel.
- Includes two 2200mAh batteries for wireless use.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Qwertykeys Neo65
65% Layout & Mounting Style Comparison
Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $150.
- 65% layout includes dedicated arrow and navigation keys for better out-of-the-box productivity.
- Explicitly listed VIA support for easy key remapping.
- Wider selection of case materials (Aluminum, Brass, Copper) and plate options (Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, PC, PP).
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
Your primary layout need dictates the choice. If you prioritize a minimalist, ultra-portable 60% board and prefer a gasket mount, the Neo60 Cu is the candidate. If you want dedicated arrow keys, extensive material customization, and VIA support in a 65% form factor at a lower price, the Neo65 is the clear winner, provided you can wait for its production time.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Neo Neo60 Cu
Qwertykeys Neo65
Layout size
60%
65%
Case material
Aluminum
Aluminum, Brass, Copper
Mount style
Gasket Mount
PCB Mount
VIA
No
Yes
GUI remapping without compiling firmware
- Neo Neo60 Cu
- Qwertykeys Neo65
- Performance
- 5957
- Build quality
- 6387
- Productivity
- 6162
- Customizability
- 4768
- Portability
- 8685
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 2,200 mAh
- Sound dampening
- Layout standard: ANSI, ISO
What will you mostly use it for?
The Neo65 is the more versatile choice for productivity-focused tasks like office work and programming due to its 65% layout with arrow keys. The Neo60 Cu wins for portability with its smaller 60% size. For modding, the Neo65 offers a wider selection of plates and case materials. Gaming and content creation are ties, as both keyboards share core wireless and acoustic features, leaving the choice to personal layout preference.
It's a tie
- Both offer N-Key Rollover for simultaneous key presses.
- Both support tri-mode connectivity, including a 2.4 GHz wireless option.
- The Neo65 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate, but the Neo60 Cu's polling rate is not specified in the provided data.
Neo Neo60 Cu vs Qwertykeys Neo65 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
4 of 20 specs differ
Neo Neo60 Cu
Qwertykeys Neo65
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Neo Neo60 Cu
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
Qwertykeys Neo65
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Neo Neo60 Cu vs Qwertykeys Neo65: your questions
The Neo60 Cu is a 60% keyboard, which lacks dedicated arrow, function, and navigation clusters. The Qwertykeys Neo65 is a 65% keyboard, which retains dedicated arrow keys and a few other navigation keys while still being compact.
Yes. Both the Neo60 Cu and the Neo65 support tri-mode connectivity. This includes a wired USB-C connection, Bluetooth, and a 2.4 GHz wireless connection with an included dongle.
The Neo65 offers more documented options for customizing the typing feel. Its listing specifies multiple plate materials like Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, Polycarbonate, and PP, each affecting sound and flex. The Neo60 Cu's plate options are not detailed in the same way.
The Qwertykeys Neo65 explicitly lists VIA support, allowing for graphical key remapping. The Neo60 Cu's vendor page includes a link to download a JSON file for VIA, suggesting compatibility, but VIA support is not explicitly listed in its core metadata.
No. Both products are sold as barebones DIY kits. This means the case, PCB, stabilizers, and various foams and accessories are included, but you must purchase mechanical switches and keycaps separately to complete the build.
They use different mounting styles. The Neo60 Cu uses a gasket mount, where the PCB/plate assembly is suspended on rubber gaskets. The Neo65 uses a PCB mount style, and its vendor description mentions it also supports an 'isolated top mount' as an alternative assembly option.
Both kits are comprehensively equipped. They include the case, PCB, plate, foam kits (PE sheet, PCB foam, case foam), gaskets, a daughterboard, rubber feet, and free gifts like a carrying case, switch puller, screwdriver, clip-in stabilizers, and a USB-C cable.
Both keyboards are listed with the same 2200mAh battery capacity. The Neo60 Cu kit includes two of these batteries, while the Neo65's tri-mode kit also includes two 2200mAh batteries. Actual battery life will depend on usage patterns and switch choice.
The Neo65 has a specified weight of 2500g (2.5kg). The weight for the Neo60 Cu is not provided in the metadata, so a direct comparison cannot be made. However, the Neo65's brass or copper bottom case contributes to its substantial weight.
The Neo65 is listed at a lower price point. This may be due to differences in mounting style complexity, material costs, or brand pricing strategy. Despite the lower cost, the Neo65 offers a wider selection of materials and a 65% layout.
Yes, both are suitable for beginners. They are hot-swappable, meaning no soldering is required to install switches. They also include all necessary tools and components, along with build guides (linked for the Neo60 Cu), making the assembly process straightforward.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.












