KeebFinder
Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Compare Neo Neo60 Cu vs Qwertykeys Neo65 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for builders deciding between two wireless aluminum DIY kits from the same family. The Neo60 Cu and Neo65 share many features like tri-mode connectivity and sound dampening, making the choice difficult. The decision hinges on your preferred layout size, mounting style, and the value you place on extra material options versus a more compact footprint.

Neo60 Cu Keyboard Kit
76
Qwertykeys Neo65 Cu Keyboard

Select a keyboard to compare

0.0 (0)
5.0 (2)
  • Available in a 60% layout
  • Uses a Gasket Mount mounting style
  • Made with a Aluminum case
  • Available in a 65% layout
  • Supports VIA configuration
  • Uses a PCB Mount mounting style
  • Runs at a 1000 Hz polling rate
  • Weighs about 2500 g
  • Sized at 19 x 292 x 109 mm
  • Made with a Aluminum, Brass, Copper case
Scores
  • Performance: 59.4
  • Build Quality: 63.1
  • Productivity: 60.3
  • Customizability: 47.2
  • Portability: 86.7
Scores
  • Performance: 57.5
  • Build Quality: 87.1
  • Productivity: 62.3
  • Customizability: 68.3
  • Portability: 85.6
Name
Neo Neo60 Cu
Name
Qwertykeys Neo65
Release year
2025
Release year
2025
Switch Options
-
Switch Options
-
Profile
Normal Profile
Profile
Normal Profile
Hot Swappable
 
Hot Swappable
 
Layout Size
60%
Layout Size
65%
Layout Standard
ANSI, ISO
Layout Standard
ANSI, ISO
Layout Ergonomics
Normal
Layout Ergonomics
Normal
Knob Support
 
Knob Support
 
Display Support
 
Display Support
 
Mac/Win Support
 
Mac/Win Support
 
Multi-Media Keys
 
Multi-Media Keys
 
USB-C
 
USB-C
 
USB passthrough
 
USB passthrough
 
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate
-
Polling Rate
1000 Hz
Battery capacity
2200 mAh
Battery capacity
2200 mAh
Hall Effect Support
 
Hall Effect Support
 
QMK Support
 
QMK Support
 
VIA Support
 
VIA Support
 
VIAL Support
 
VIAL Support
 
N-Key Rollover
 
N-Key Rollover
 
Rapid Trigger
 
Rapid Trigger
 
Mount Style
Gasket Mount
Mount Style
PCB Mount
Screw in Stabilizers
 
Screw in Stabilizers
 
Sound Dampening
 
Sound Dampening
 
Backlight
 
Backlight
 
Case Colors
Case Colors
Case Material
Aluminum
Case Material
Aluminum, Brass, Copper
Keycaps Material
-
Keycaps Material
-
Dimensions
-
Dimensions
19 x 292 x 109 mm
Weight
-
Weight
2500g
*Something incorrect or missing? Please
let me know
!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary layout need dictates the choice. If you prioritize a minimalist, ultra-portable 60% board and prefer a gasket mount, the Neo60 Cu is the candidate. If you want dedicated arrow keys, extensive material customization, and VIA support in a 65% form factor at a lower price, the Neo65 is the clear winner, provided you can wait for its production time.

Neo Neo60 Cu

  • +More compact 60% form factor for maximum desk space savings.
  • +Gasket mount design for a potentially softer, more cushioned typing feel.
  • +Includes two 2200mAh batteries for wireless use.
  • +Kit includes tools like a screwdriver and switch puller.
  • −Lacks dedicated arrow keys, requiring a function layer for navigation.
  • −No explicit mention of VIA support in the metadata, though a JSON file is listed for download.
  • −Only an aluminum case is listed, with fewer material options than the Neo65.

Qwertykeys Neo65

  • +65% layout includes dedicated arrow and navigation keys for better out-of-the-box productivity.
  • +Explicitly listed VIA support for easy key remapping.
  • +Wider selection of case materials (Aluminum, Brass, Copper) and plate options (Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, PC, PP).
  • +Lower cost relative to the Neo60 Cu.
  • −PCB mount style, which may offer a different typing feel compared to gasket mount.
  • −Significant 12-week estimated production and ship time for made-to-order units.
  • −Heavier at 2500g, which reduces portability.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The Neo65 is the more versatile choice for productivity-focused tasks like office work and programming due to its 65% layout with arrow keys. The Neo60 Cu wins for portability with its smaller 60% size. For modding, the Neo65 offers a wider selection of plates and case materials. Gaming and content creation are ties, as both keyboards share core wireless and acoustic features, leaving the choice to personal layout preference.

GamingTie
  • •Both offer N-Key Rollover for simultaneous key presses.
  • •Both support tri-mode connectivity, including a 2.4 GHz wireless option.
  • •The Neo65 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate, but the Neo60 Cu's polling rate is not specified in the provided data.
OfficeQwertykeys Neo65
  • •The Neo65's 65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys, which are often preferred for spreadsheet navigation.
  • •Both are wireless, but the Neo65's layout may require fewer layers for common office functions.
  • •Both include a carrying case for transport between workspaces.
ProgrammingQwertykeys Neo65
  • •The Neo65's 65% layout provides dedicated arrow keys without a function layer, useful for code navigation.
  • •Both support VIA/QMK for key remapping, but VIA support is explicitly listed for the Neo65.
  • •The Neo60 Cu's 60% layout requires a function layer to access arrows, which can interrupt workflow.
TravelNeo Neo60 Cu
  • •The Neo60 Cu's 60% layout is more compact, saving space in a bag.
  • •Both include a protective carrying case and have similar battery capacities (2200mAh).
  • •The Neo65 is notably heavier at 2500g, while the Neo60 Cu's weight is not specified.
ModdingQwertykeys Neo65
  • •The Neo65 offers more plate material choices: Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, Polycarbonate, and PP.
  • •The Neo65's listing details multiple bottom case materials (Aluminum, Brass, Copper) and weight options.
  • •Both are hot-swappable DIY kits, but the Neo65 provides more documented component variety.
Content CreationTie
  • •Both offer quiet, dampened typing experiences with included foam kits, suitable for recording.
  • •Both are wireless, reducing cable clutter on a desk.
  • •Layout preference is subjective; some may prefer the Neo60's minimalism, others the Neo65's dedicated arrows for timeline scrubbing.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Discover similar products

You might also like similar products in that price range:

91
$200
Neo65 Cu Barebones Kit
Neo Neo65
65%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount

75
$110
Qwertykeys Neo60 Cu Keyboard
Qwertykeys Neo60
60%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
VIA,
Alu case,
PCB Mount

79
$205
Neo65 Core Plus - 65% ISO+ANSI Mechanical Aluminium Custom Keyboard Kit
Qwertykeys Studio Neo65 Core Plus
65%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount

99
$129
Keychron K2 HE Wireless Magnetic Switch Custom Keyboard
Keychron K2 HE
75%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB/ White LEDs,
Knob,
VIA,
QMK,
HE,
Rapid trigger,
Alu case,
Tray Mount

76
$246
[In Stock] Geometry70 70% Mechanical Keyboard
Mek Studio Geometry70
70%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Top Mount

93
$105
MonsGeek M1W Aluminum Wireless Gasket DIY Kit
Monsgeek M1W
75%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB,
Knob,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount

97
$239
Keychron Q10 Max (Alice Layout) QMK/VIA Wireless Custom Mechanical Keyboard
Keychron Q10 Max
75%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB,
Knob,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount

100
$104
Lemokey P1 QMK/VIA Custom Gaming Keyboard
Keychron Lemokey P1
75%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB,
Knob,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount

98
$186
Keychron Q1 Max QMK/VIA Wireless Custom Mechanical Keyboard
Keychron Q1 Max
75%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB,
Knob,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount

94
$100
Keychron Q8 Pro (Alice Layout) QMK/VIA Wireless Custom Mechanical Keyboard
Keychron Q8 Pro
65%,
Hotswap,
Wireless,
Wired,
RGB,
Knob,
VIA,
QMK,
Alu case,
Gasket Mount