Which one should you get?
Get the
Neo Neo60 Cu
60%
- More compact 60% form factor for superior portability.
- Includes a carrying case, keycap puller, screwdriver, and other tools as free gifts.
- Offers two assembly methods: PCB gasket mount and isolated top mount.
- Lacks dedicated arrow keys, requiring a function layer for navigation.
- Battery capacity is lower (2200mAh) compared to the Neo65's 4400mAh.
- Comes with clip-in PCB mount stabilizers, which are less favored by modders than screw-in types.
Get the
Neo Neo65
65% Wireless DIY Keyboard Comparison
- 65% layout includes dedicated arrow and navigation keys for better productivity.
- Larger 4400mAh battery for longer wireless usage.
- Includes screw-in stabilizers, which offer more stability and are easier to tune.
- Larger 65% footprint is less portable than a 60% board.
- The vendor description for the Neo65 mentions 'Neo65 Cu plates,' which may cause confusion as the base metadata lists it as the Neo65.
- Weighs 400g, making it heavier than the Neo60 Cu (weight not specified).
Your primary need dictates the choice. If your workflow depends on arrow keys and you value longer battery life and modding headroom, the Neo65 is the clear recommendation. If minimizing desk footprint or bag space is your top priority, and you are comfortable using layers for arrows, the Neo60 Cu is the better option. Both are capable, well-featured DIY kits at a similar price point.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Neo Neo60 Cu
Neo Neo65
Layout size
60%
65%
Battery
2,200 mAh
4,400 mAh
Case material
Aluminum
Aluminum, Brass, Copper
QMK
No
Yes
VIA
No
Yes
- Neo Neo60 Cu
- Neo Neo65
- Performance
- 5983
- Build quality
- 6394
- Productivity
- 6183
- Customizability
- 4790
- Portability
- 8786
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
- Layout standard: ANSI, ISO
What will you mostly use it for?
The Neo65 is the more versatile choice for work-focused tasks like office use, programming, and content creation due to its practical 65% layout. The Neo60 Cu wins for travel thanks to its smaller size. For gaming and general use, they are closely matched, with the Neo65 having a slight edge in confirmed high-polling-rate performance and modding potential due to its plate options and stabilizer type.
It's a tie
- Both offer tri-mode connectivity for wired or wireless use.
- Both feature N-Key Rollover for simultaneous key presses.
- The Neo65 lists a 4000 Hz polling rate, while the Neo60 Cu's polling rate is not specified in the provided data.
Neo Neo60 Cu vs Neo65 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
8 of 22 specs differ
Neo Neo60 Cu
Neo Neo65
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Neo Neo60 Cu vs Neo65: your questions
The core difference is the layout size. The Neo60 Cu is a 60% keyboard, which lacks dedicated arrow and navigation keys. The Neo65 is a 65% keyboard, which retains dedicated arrow keys and a few additional navigation keys, making it more functional for general productivity.
No. Both the Neo60 Cu and Neo65 are sold as barebones DIY kits. According to the vendor listings, they do not include switches, keycaps, or plates. You must purchase these components separately to complete the build.
Yes. Both keyboards feature hot-swappable PCBs. This allows you to easily change mechanical switches without any soldering, which is ideal for testing different switch types or for beginners.
Both keyboards offer tri-mode connectivity. You can connect via a USB-C cable, Bluetooth, or a 2.4 GHz wireless dongle. The 2.4 GHz dongle is included in the kit, as per the vendor description.
The Neo65 has a larger battery capacity. Its listed 4400mAh battery is double the capacity of the Neo60 Cu's 2200mAh setup, which should translate to significantly longer usage between charges for wireless operation.
Yes, but it requires adaptation. Programming on a 60% keyboard like the Neo60 Cu involves using a function (Fn) layer to access arrow keys, which can slow down code navigation. Many programmers prefer the 65% layout of the Neo65 for its dedicated arrow keys.
Both keyboards support two mounting styles. According to the manufacturer, they can be assembled using either a PCB gasket mount for a softer, more flexible typing feel, or an isolated top mount for a more rigid construction. The kits include components for both methods.
The vendor states that free gifts include a keyboard carrying case, a keycap and switch puller, a screwdriver, clip-in PCB mount NeoStabs (screw-in for Neo65), and a USB-C cable. These tools assist with the assembly and future modifications.
The Neo65's product listing specifies a 4000 Hz polling rate. The polling rate for the Neo60 Cu is not explicitly stated in the provided specifications, so a direct comparison cannot be made for that model.
Both are similar in complexity, but the Neo65 might have a slight edge for beginners due to its screw-in stabilizers, which are often easier to install and tune properly than clip-in stabilizers. Otherwise, the assembly process and included tools are comparable for both kits.
No. Neither the Neo Neo60 Cu nor the Neo Neo65 feature per-key RGB backlighting according to their specifications. They rely on the aesthetic of their aluminum case and keycap choices.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.












