Qwertykeys Neo65 vs Tex ShuraWireless or Trackpoint
Choose the Qwertykeys Neo65 for tri-mode wireless and VIA, or the Tex Shura if its built-in TrackPoint is the deciding feature.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 · 8 reviews
from$125at Divinikey
Which one should you get?
Get the
Qwertykeys Neo65
VIA
Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $150.
- Tri-mode connectivity includes wired USB-C, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz wireless.
- VIA support and hot-swap PCB provide customization options.
- Aluminum top case with brass or copper bottom-case options, according to the vendor listing.
Get the
Tex Shura
Build quality in the bottom 40% of 65% boards under $150.
- Built-in Tex TrackPoint adds pointer control within the keyboard.
- The vendor describes the kit as programmable and includes keycaps and a case.
- Hot-swappable PCB supports switch customization.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Choose the Qwertykeys Neo65 if you want wireless flexibility, VIA support, or more choice in plate and mounting options. Choose the Tex Shura if a built-in TrackPoint is more useful to your workflow than Bluetooth or 2.4 GHz connectivity. Buyers who need an ISO layout should rule out the Shura.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Qwertykeys Neo65
Tex Shura
Case material
Aluminum, Brass, Copper
ABS, Plastic
Mount style
PCB Mount
Plate Mount
VIA
Yes
No
GUI remapping without compiling firmware
Sound dampening
Yes
No
Layout standard
ANSI, ISO
ANSI
ISO and JIS exist so regional layouts fit
- Qwertykeys Neo65
- Tex Shura
- Performance
- 5749
- Build quality
- 8757
- Productivity
- 6345
- Customizability
- 6861
- Portability
- 8570
- Layout size: 65%
- Hot-swappable
What will you mostly use it for?
The Neo65 is the stronger fit for gaming, travel, and hands-on customization, with listed polling, wireless modes, and broader construction options. The Shura has an office edge for buyers who specifically want a built-in TrackPoint and Mac/Windows support. Programming is a close call because both offer programmable or remappable functionality, while their other differentiators serve different workflows. Content creators may prefer the Neo65's connectivity flexibility, though the Shura's TrackPoint could suit pointer-heavy work.
Pick the Qwertykeys Neo65
- The Neo65 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate, while the Shura has no polling-rate figure listed.
- The Neo65 supports wired USB-C, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connections.
Qwertykeys Neo65 vs Tex Shura specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 23 specs differ
Qwertykeys Neo65
Tex Shura
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Qwertykeys Neo65
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
Tex Shura
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
Qwertykeys Neo65 vs Tex Shura: your questions
Yes. The Neo65 supports Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, as well as wired USB-C. The Shura listing does not specify wireless connectivity.
Yes, the Tex Shura vendor listing identifies its signature Tex TrackPoint, also described as a mouse nub. That makes it the choice here for buyers who want pointer control on the keyboard.
The Qwertykeys Neo65 lists VIA support. The Shura is described as programmable, but its listing does not identify VIA.
The Neo65 supports ANSI and ISO layouts. The Shura is ANSI-only and does not offer ISO-DE, UK, or other ISO variants.
Yes, both keyboards list hot-swappable PCBs. The Shura vendor description also says switches are not included, so buyers assembling that kit will need to source switches separately.
The Neo65 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and supports wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connections. The Shura has no polling-rate figure listed, so the Neo65 is the more clearly specified option for gaming.
Both offer customization: the Neo65 supports VIA, and the Shura is described as programmable. The Shura adds a TrackPoint, while the Neo65 supports both ANSI and ISO layouts.
Yes, the Shura product listing specifies Mac and Windows support, and its vendor description also lists Linux compatibility. The Neo65 listing does not specify operating-system compatibility.
The Neo65 metadata lists carbon fiber, aluminum, plastic, and polycarbonate plates. Its vendor listing also describes the relative feel and sound profiles of carbon fiber, aluminum, PC, and PP plates.
The vendor listing describes a case, weight, PCB, plate, foam kit, gaskets, and rubber feet. It also lists a carrying case, keycap and switch puller, screwdriver, stabilizers, and USB-C cable as free gifts.
The vendor listing says the Shura includes its TrackPoint, keycaps, and case, plus bonuses such as O-rings, a keycap puller, and extra keycaps. Switches are not included, and assembly is required.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.