Compare Qwertykeys Neo65 Core Plus vs Neo75 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between Qwertykeys' two popular aluminum gasket-mount kits. The choice hinges on whether you prioritize a compact, lighter 65% layout or a slightly larger 75% layout with a function row. Both offer tri-mode connectivity, premium materials, and extensive customization, making the decision difficult for enthusiasts who value build quality but have different space and layout needs.

Model
	77	90	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	5.0 stars (6 reviews)	5.0 stars (22 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2025 Available in a 65% layout Includes screw-in stabilizers Supports Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless connectivity Runs at a 1000 Hz polling rate Equipped with a 4400 mAh battery Weighs about 1340 g Sized at 18 x 313 x 111 mm Made with a Aluminum case	Released in 2024 Available in a 75% layout Supports QMK firmware Supports VIA configuration Supports 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth connectivity Equipped with a 8000 mAh battery Weighs about 2200 g Sized at 18 x 317 x 134 mm Made with a Aluminum, Brass, Copper, Steel case Features ABS, PBT keycaps
Score	Scores Performance: 53.6 Build Quality: 80.4 Productivity: 80.6 Customizability: 69.6 Portability: 89	Scores Performance: 65.3 Build Quality: 93.7 Productivity: 88.7 Customizability: 86.2 Portability: 91.4
Name	Name Qwertykeys Neo65 Core Plus	Name Qwertykeys Neo75
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options -	Switch Options -
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 65%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI, ISO	Layout Standard ANSI, ISO
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 1000 Hz	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 4400 mAh	Battery capacity 8000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight	Backlight
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Aluminum, Brass, Copper, Steel
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material -	Keycaps Material ABS, PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 18 x 313 x 111 mm	Dimensions 18 x 317 x 134 mm
Weight	Weight 1340g	Weight 2200g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your decision should be guided by layout preference and weight tolerance. Choose the Qwertykeys Neo75 if you need dedicated function keys and prefer a heavier, more stationary keyboard. Opt for the Neo65 Core Plus if you value a lighter, more compact board for gaming or travel, and don't mind accessing functions via a layer. Both deliver excellent build quality and customization at a similar price point.

Qwertykeys Neo65 Core Plus

+Lighter weight at 1340g for easier portability.
+Smaller 65% footprint saves desk space.
+Confirmed 1000 Hz polling rate for responsive input.
+Includes a dual-mounting system with gasket and gummy O-ring options.
+Magnetic POGO pin connectors for easy, tool-free PCB removal.

−Lacks dedicated function keys, requiring the use of layers.
−Fewer plate material options (Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, PP) compared to the Neo75.
−The vendor description notes a long estimated fulfillment time of 12 weeks.

Qwertykeys Neo75

+75% layout includes a dedicated function row for immediate access.
+Heavier, more substantial build at approximately 2200g.
+Offers three mounting styles: Poron gasket, silicone gasket, and top mount.
+Features an integrated force-break layer between cases for sound isolation.
+Wider selection of plate materials, including POM and FR4.

−Significantly heavier, which reduces portability.
−Larger footprint may not fit all desk setups or travel bags as easily.
−Polling rate is not explicitly stated in the provided specifications.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The Neo75 is the clear choice for office work and programming due to its dedicated function row. The Neo65 Core Plus wins for gaming and travel, thanks to its confirmed high polling rate, lighter weight, and smaller size. For modding and content creation, both keyboards are equally capable, offering extensive customization and a premium, minimalist build. Your primary task will dictate the winner.

GamingQwertykeys Neo65 Core Plus

•The Neo65 Core Plus has a confirmed 1000 Hz polling rate, which is not explicitly stated for the Neo75.
•Its lighter weight (1340g vs 2200g) may allow for easier repositioning on a desk.
•The more compact 65% layout frees up more mousepad space.

OfficeQwertykeys Neo75

•The Neo75's 75% layout includes dedicated function keys, which can be useful for productivity shortcuts.
•Its heavier weight (2200g) provides more stability on a desk.
•Both offer tri-mode connectivity for flexible device switching.

ProgrammingQwertykeys Neo75

•The dedicated function row on the Neo75 is valuable for IDE shortcuts and debugging.
•The larger layout provides more immediate key access without layers.
•The heavier build may feel more substantial during long typing sessions.

TravelQwertykeys Neo65 Core Plus

•The Neo65 Core Plus is significantly lighter at 1340g compared to the Neo75's 2200g.
•Its smaller 65% footprint (313x111mm vs 317x134mm) takes up less bag space.
•Both have the same 4400mAh battery capacity for wireless use.

ModdingTie

•Both are hot-swappable DIY kits with multiple plate material options.
•Both feature gasket mount designs and include comprehensive foam kits for sound tuning.
•The Neo65 Core Plus offers a dual-mounting system (gasket or O-ring), while the Neo75 offers three mounting styles (Poron gasket, silicone gasket, or top mount).

Content CreationTie

•Both lack RGB, focusing on a clean aesthetic.
•Both offer a premium aluminum build and gasket-mounted typing feel.
•Choice depends on whether the user prefers the compactness of the 65% or the dedicated keys of the 75% for shortcut mapping.