Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 28, 2026

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU vs WOBKEY Rainy7565% compactness or 75% keys

Choose the Neo65 CU for its compact 65% form and brass-and-steel construction, or the Rainy75 for a function row and a more complete out-of-box setup.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU

Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $300.

If you want

  • Brass bottom case and polished PVD stainless steel weight, according to the vendor description.
  • Choice of isolated Top Mount or PCB Gasket Mount.
  • Plate choices include aluminum, PP, carbon fiber, and PC.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • Missing ISO-DE. The other board is sold in those layouts.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Get the

WOBKEY Rainy75

Battery

Build quality in the top 5% of 75% boards under $150.

If you want

  • 75% layout includes a function row.
  • Vendor description lists HMX Violet linear switches with 45g actuation force and double-shot PBT keycaps.
  • 3500mAh battery and Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and USB-C connectivity are listed.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No numpad.

Bottom line

Choose the Neo65 CU if compactness and configuration are priorities, especially if you want its two mounting options and multiple plate materials. Choose the Rainy75 if you want a function row and a keyboard that includes keycaps and linear switches. Both support wireless connectivity, hot-swap, and VIA, so the clearest deciding factor is whether you prefer the Neo65 CU's compact custom-kit approach or the Rainy75's larger, more complete setup.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU

WOBKEY Rainy75

  • Layout size

    65%

    75%

  • Battery

    2,200 mAh

    3,500 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Case material

    Aluminum, Brass, Copper

    Aluminum

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    Gasket Mount, PCB Mount, Plate Mount

  • Weight

    200 g

    1,800 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Qwertykeys Neo65 CU
  • WOBKEY Rainy75
Performance
68
70
Build quality
92
90
Productivity
78
94
Customizability
77
94
Portability
87
81

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • VIA
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Rainy75 has the edge for office, programming, and content workflows where the function row and included typing components matter. The Neo65 CU is a stronger fit for buyers who prioritize a smaller layout and want to choose between mounting styles and several plate materials. Travel favors the smaller 65% layout, though the Rainy75 has a larger listed battery capacity. For gaming, both offer wired and 2.4 GHz connections, with Rainy75's named linear switches and the Neo65 CU's stated polling rate making the choice depend on which details matter more.

For gaming

Pick the WOBKEY Rainy75

  • The Rainy75 vendor lists HMX Violet linear switches and a 45g actuation force.
  • Both keyboards list 2.4 GHz and wired connectivity; the Neo65 CU specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate, while no polling rate is listed for the Rainy75.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU

5.0

12 owner reviews

Praise
“my experience with MonacoKeys has been so far super positive. Great, responsive communication from Michael!”
Juan H.Verified buyer· via MonacoKeys

WOBKEY Rainy75

5.0

22 owner reviews

Praise
“Amazing build quality and sound. The Keyboard is visually and audibly very appealing. The correct QWERTZ DE layout made the decision to get this keyboard quite easy.”
AnonymousVerified buyer· via MonacoKeys

Full specs

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU vs WOBKEY Rainy75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

12 of 25 specs differ

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU

WOBKEY Rainy75

Typing & switches

Switch options

—
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount, PCB Mount, Plate Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

65%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI, ISO
ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

2,200 mAh
3,500 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum, Brass, Copper
Aluminum

Plate material

Aluminum, CarbonFiber, Plastic, POM
FR4, Plastic, Polycarbonate

Keycaps

—
PBT

Weight

200 g
1,800 g

Dimensions

—
40 x 320 x 130 mm

Typing angle

8°
—

Backlight

Yes, south-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

QMK

No
Yes

VIA

Yes
Yes

N-key rollover

Yes
No

Mac & Windows

No
Yes

Extras

Released

2026
2024

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

WOBKEY Rainy75

  • Input Gear

    ISO-DE

    Out of stockShips to you

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Qwertykeys Neo65 CU vs WOBKEY Rainy75: your questions

The Neo65 CU uses a 65% layout, while the Rainy75 uses a 75% layout with a function row. The Neo65 CU is a barebone kit, whereas the Rainy75 vendor description lists included PBT keycaps and HMX Violet switches.

The Rainy75's 75% layout includes a function row. The Neo65 CU's 65% layout does not have one.

The Rainy75 lists ISO-DE among its supported layout standards. ISO-DE is not listed for the Neo65 CU, though its vendor description says the selected PCB supports ANSI and ISO.

Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz connectivity, as well as wired use. The Neo65 CU vendor description specifies that Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz are available with its Tri-Mode PCB option.

The Rainy75 lists a 3500mAh battery. The Neo65 CU vendor description lists two 2200mAh batteries with the Tri-Mode PCB.

Both list hot-swap support. The Neo65 CU is a barebone kit, so switches and keycaps are sold separately according to its vendor description.

Both keyboards list VIA support. The Rainy75 vendor description specifies VIA programming over wired and 2.4 GHz modes.

QMK support is listed for the Rainy75. The Neo65 CU lists VIA support, but QMK is not listed for it.

The Rainy75 vendor description lists HMX Violet linear switches with 45g actuation force. The Neo65 CU is sold as a barebone kit, and its vendor description says switches must be purchased separately.

The Neo65 CU offers isolated Top Mount and PCB Gasket Mount options, according to its vendor description. The Rainy75 is listed with gasket mount, PCB mount, and plate mount.

Both keyboards have south-facing LEDs, and their compatibility notes warn that shine-through legends stay dark. Some sculpted keycaps may also clip the LEDs.

Neither keyboard includes a numpad: the Neo65 CU's 65% layout has no numpad, and the Rainy75 compatibility notes also specify no numpad. The Rainy75 does provide a function row, which the Neo65 CU lacks.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.