Compare Redragon M61 vs M68 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two of Redragon's compact, high-polling-rate Hall Effect keyboards. The choice is difficult because both share core specs like 8000Hz polling, magnetic linear switches, PBT keycaps, and a metal case. The decision ultimately hinges on whether you prioritize the ultra-minimalist 60% layout of the M61 or the slightly larger 65% layout with hot-swap capability found on the M68.

Model
			Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2023 Available in a 60% layout Sized at 33 x 104 x 291 mm Made with a Metal, Plastic case	Released in 2024 Supports hot-swappable switches Available in a 65% layout Connects via USB-C Has built-in sound dampening Weighs about 550 g Sized at 36 x 101 x 310 mm Made with a Metal case
Score	Scores Performance: 72.6 Build Quality: 37.8 Productivity: 43.2 Customizability: 45.8 Portability: 60.4	Scores Performance: 75.3 Build Quality: 40.6 Productivity: 56.6 Customizability: 53.8 Portability: 67.4
Name	Name Redragon M61	Name Redragon M68
Release year	Release year 2023	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 60%	Layout Size 65%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 8000 Hz	Polling Rate 8000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style -	Mount Style -
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Metal, Plastic	Case Material Metal
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 33 x 104 x 291 mm	Dimensions 36 x 101 x 310 mm
Weight	Weight -	Weight 550g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

The Redragon M68 is the recommended choice for most users due to its more practical 65% layout and future-proof hot-swap capability. Only choose the Redragon M61 if you are committed to the 60% form factor and do not plan on modifying switches, as its smaller size is its primary advantage.

Redragon M61

+More compact 60% layout for maximum desk space savings.
+Slightly thinner profile according to listed dimensions.
+Shares the high 8000Hz polling rate with the M68.
+Features the same adjustable magnetic linear switches.
+Uses durable PBT keycaps.

−Lacks dedicated arrow keys, requiring a function layer.
−Not listed as hot-swappable, limiting switch customization.
−No mention of internal sound-dampening foam.

Redragon M68

+65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys for better productivity.
+Full-key hot-swappable design for easy switch replacement.
+Includes sound-absorbing internal filling for a potentially quieter typing experience.
+Shares the 8000Hz polling rate and magnetic switches.
+Built with a metallic chassis and PBT keycaps.

−Larger footprint than the 60% M61.
−Slightly thicker according to listed dimensions.
−Both are wired-only, with no wireless option.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The M68 is the more versatile choice, winning in office, programming, modding, and content creation due to its arrow keys and hot-swap sockets. The M61 takes the lead only for travel, where its minimal 60% size is the decisive factor. For pure gaming, the keyboards are effectively tied, sharing their high-performance Hall Effect switches and polling rate.

GamingTie

•Both offer an 8000Hz polling rate for minimal input latency.
•Both feature adjustable magnetic linear switches for customizable actuation.
•Both have a metal case construction for stability.

OfficeRedragon M68

•The M68's 65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys, which are often essential for spreadsheet navigation.
•The M68's listing mentions sound-absorbing internal filling, which may reduce noise in shared spaces.
•The M68's slightly larger layout may feel more familiar for general office tasks.

ProgrammingRedragon M68

•The M68's dedicated arrow keys are crucial for efficient code navigation without layer toggles.
•The hot-swappable design allows for easy switch replacement if a preferred tactile option is desired later.
•The 65% layout retains more immediate keys than the 60% M61.

TravelRedragon M61

•The M61 has a smaller 60% footprint (291x104mm vs 310x101mm for the M68).
•The M61 is slightly thinner (33mm vs 36mm for the M68).
•Both are wired-only, but the M61's more compact size is easier to pack.

ModdingRedragon M68

•The M68 is explicitly listed as having a full-key hot-swappable design.
•The M68 includes sound-absorbing internal filling from the factory.
•The vendor description for the M61 does not mention hot-swap capability, suggesting it is not hot-swappable.

Content CreationRedragon M68

•Dedicated arrow keys on the M68 are valuable for timeline scrubbing and photo editing.
•Hot-swappable sockets allow for customization with switches better suited for prolonged typing sessions.
•The potential for quieter typing with the M68's sound-dampening foam is beneficial for recording audio.