Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 14, 2026

Royalaxe X68 HE vs Sikakeyb Castle CK75

Get the Royalaxe X68 HE for its aluminum case and 65% footprint, or the Sikakeyb Castle CK75 for its 75% layout, gasket mount, sound dampening, and stated 8000 Hz polling rate.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Royalaxe X68 HE

Hot-swappable

Build quality in the bottom 15% of 65% boards under $200.

If you want

  • Aluminum case.
  • 65% layout for a more compact keyboard footprint.
  • Listed as hot-swappable, with compatibility limited to magnetic switches.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Get the

Sikakeyb Castle CK75

Sound dampening

Build quality in the bottom 10% of 75% boards under $200.

If you want

  • 75% layout, larger than a 65% layout.
  • Gasket mount and sound dampening.
  • Listed 8000 Hz polling rate.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • No numpad.

Bottom line

Choose the Royalaxe X68 HE for its aluminum case, compact 65% layout, and listed hot-swap feature, which the CK75 does not list. Choose the Sikakeyb Castle CK75 for its 75% layout, gasket mount, sound dampening, and stated 8000 Hz polling rate, features not listed for the X68 HE. Both restrict switch choice to magnetic switches, and neither includes a numpad.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Royalaxe X68 HE

Sikakeyb Castle CK75

  • Layout size

    65%

    75%

  • Hot-swappable

    Yes

    No

    Switch changes without soldering

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    ABS

  • Sound dampening

    No

    Yes

  • Released

    2025

    2024

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Royalaxe X68 HE
  • Sikakeyb Castle CK75
Performance
72
88
Build quality
44
42
Productivity
49
56
Customizability
57
46
Portability
71
61

What they share

  • Hall effect (magnetic)
  • Rapid trigger
  • Connection: Wired
  • Switch options: Magnetic
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The CK75 is the more compelling fit for gaming and work that benefits from its listed 8000 Hz polling rate, larger layout, gasket mount, and sound dampening. The X68 HE is the compact pick, and its hot-swap listing gives it an advantage for users interested in changing switches within its magnetic-only limit. Both are wired Hall Effect boards with Rapid Trigger, so those shared features do not decide the comparison. For travel, the X68 HE’s smaller layout is a concrete advantage, though only the CK75 has a listed weight.

For gaming

Pick the Sikakeyb Castle CK75

  • The CK75 lists an 8000 Hz polling rate.
  • Both boards have Hall Effect switches and Rapid Trigger, while the CK75 also uses a 75% layout.

Full specs

Royalaxe X68 HE vs Sikakeyb Castle CK75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

5 of 19 specs differ

Royalaxe X68 HE

Sikakeyb Castle CK75

Typing & switches

Switch options

Magnetic
Magnetic

Hall effect (magnetic)

Yes
Yes

Rapid trigger

Yes
Yes

Hot-swappable

Yes
No

Mount style

—
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

65%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Wired
Wired

Max polling rate

—
8,000 Hz

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

—
805 g

Dimensions

—
29 x 129 x 316 mm

Backlight

RGB
RGB

Extras

Released

2025
2024

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Royalaxe X68 HE vs Sikakeyb Castle CK75: your questions

The CK75 lists an 8000 Hz polling rate, while the X68 HE’s metadata does not list a polling rate. Both keyboards have Hall Effect switches and Rapid Trigger, so the CK75’s listed rate is the clearest gaming distinction.

Yes, both are listed with Rapid Trigger and Hall Effect switches. The Royalaxe vendor description also names adjustable trigger response for the X68 HE.

No. Its compatibility information specifies magnetic switches only, and standard MX switches will not fit.

The CK75 is listed with magnetic switches, but it is not listed as hot-swappable. Standard MX switches will not fit, so do not assume MX switch compatibility.

The Royalaxe X68 HE is a 65% ANSI keyboard, while the Sikakeyb Castle CK75 is a 75% ANSI keyboard. The X68 HE has no function row or numpad, and the CK75’s compatibility details specify that it has no numpad.

The Royalaxe X68 HE has an aluminum case. The Castle CK75 is listed with an ABS case.

Yes, the CK75 is listed with a gasket mount and sound dampening. The X68 HE does not have either feature listed in its specifications.

The Castle CK75 is listed with an 8000 Hz polling rate. The Royalaxe vendor description also mentions 8K polling, but the X68 HE’s product metadata does not list a polling rate.

No, both are listed as wired-only keyboards. Both also list USB-C.

The X68 HE’s 65% layout is smaller in layout size than the CK75’s 75% layout. The CK75 has a listed weight of 805g, while a weight is not listed for the X68 HE.

Yes, both product listings specify PBT keycaps. The Royalaxe vendor description further describes its X68 HE keycaps as five-sided thermal-sublimation PBT.

Neither is listed with a numpad. The X68 HE’s 65% layout rule explicitly says it has no numpad, and the CK75’s compatibility details also specify no numpad.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.