KBDFans Tofu65 V3 vs TOFU FullCompact or 100%
Choose the TOFU65 V3 for a compact layout and documented dual-mode PCB options, or the TOFU Full if you need a 100% layout.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
KBDFans Tofu65 V3
Mac & Windows
Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $100.
- 65% ANSI layout saves space compared with a full-size layout.
- Lists an 8000 Hz polling rate.
- Offers top-mount and gasket-mount options.
- Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
Get the
KBDFans TOFU Full
- 100% ANSI layout includes a number pad and function row.
- Lists Bluetooth and wired connectivity, plus a 1000mAh battery.
- Supports hot-swappable magnetic switches and lists VIA and VIAL support.
- Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
Pick the TOFU65 V3 if you want a smaller board, a listed 8000 Hz polling rate, or the documented gasket-mount and PCB choices. Choose the TOFU Full when a number pad and function row matter more than desk space. Both require magnetic switches, so neither is suitable for standard MX switches.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
KBDFans Tofu65 V3
KBDFans TOFU Full
Layout size
65%
100%
Case material
Aluminum, Copper, Steel
Aluminum, Polycarbonate
Mount style
Gasket Mount, Top Mount
Top Mount
Mac & Windows
Yes
No
USB-C
Yes
No
- KBDFans Tofu65 V3
- KBDFans TOFU Full
- Performance
- 8166
- Build quality
- 9185
- Productivity
- 8282
- Customizability
- 8183
- Portability
- 8550
- Hall effect (magnetic)
- Connection: Bluetooth, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 1,000 mAh
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The TOFU65 V3 has the clearer edge for gaming and travel based on its listed polling rate and smaller layout. The TOFU Full suits users who rely on a number pad and function row, making it the office-oriented choice and a reasonable fit for content workflows that use those keys. Programming is a preference call between compactness and full-size key coverage. Modders have more specifically documented build options for the TOFU65 V3.
Pick the KBDFans Tofu65 V3
- The TOFU65 V3 lists an 8000 Hz polling rate, while no polling rate is listed for the TOFU Full.
- The TOFU65 V3's 65% layout has less desk footprint than the TOFU Full's 100% layout.
KBDFans Tofu65 V3 vs TOFU Full specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
5 of 21 specs differ
KBDFans Tofu65 V3
KBDFans TOFU Full
Switch options
Hall effect (magnetic)
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
VIAL
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Go to KBDfans
KBDfans
Out of stock - Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
KBDFans Tofu65 V3 vs TOFU Full: your questions
The TOFU65 V3 has a 65% ANSI layout, while the TOFU Full has a 100% ANSI layout. The Full-size model includes the function row and number pad that the 65% model lacks.
No, the TOFU65 V3 uses a 65% layout. Its compatibility notes specify that it has no number pad or function row.
Yes, the TOFU Full is listed as a 100% ANSI keyboard. That layout is the choice between these two if you need a dedicated number pad and function row.
No, both keyboards are specified for magnetic switches only. Their compatibility rules say standard MX switches will not fit.
Both product listings include hot-swappable support, and both are specified for magnetic switches. The TOFU65 V3 vendor description also details wired hot-swap and dual-mode hot-swap PCB options.
The TOFU65 V3 lists an 8000 Hz polling rate. The TOFU Full has no polling rate listed here, so a direct comparison cannot be made.
Yes, the TOFU65 V3 and TOFU Full both list VIA and VIAL support. The TOFU65 V3 vendor description also identifies VIA and VIAL files for its PCB options.
The TOFU65 V3 is the more compact option because it uses a 65% layout rather than the TOFU Full's 100% layout. Both list Bluetooth connectivity and a 1000mAh battery.
Yes, the TOFU65 V3 lists both top mount and gasket mount. Its vendor description identifies the gasket option as a PCB gasket mount.
The TOFU Full lists top mount. The TOFU65 V3, by contrast, also lists a gasket-mount option.
The vendor describes solder, wired hot-swap, and dual-mode hot-swap PCB options, along with plates, foam kits, and weight bars. It also lists a carrying case among the included items.
Neither keyboard lists RGB. Both product specifications also list no screen.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.