Ajazz AK650 vs ATTACK SHARK K86Compact 65% vs Feature-Rich 75%
Choose the Ajazz AK650 for maximum portability and battery life, or the Attack Shark K86 for a more complete layout and premium build materials.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Ajazz AK650
Compact 65%
- More portable due to its compact 65% size and lighter 670g weight.
- Larger 5000mAh battery capacity for longer wireless usage.
- Slimmer 20mm profile for easier transport.
- Uses an ABS case, which is generally less premium than aluminum.
- The 65% layout lacks dedicated arrow keys and function row, requiring layers.
- Keycap material is not specified in the provided details, unlike the PBT keycaps on the K86.
Get the
ATTACK SHARK K86
Feature-Rich 75%
- 75% layout includes dedicated arrow keys and function row for greater out-of-the-box utility.
- Features an aluminum case for a more premium and sturdy feel.
- Comes with double-shot PBT keycaps for better durability and texture.
- Larger, heavier footprint (380mm, 930g) is less portable.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery compared to the AK650.
- The thicker 35mm profile may be less bag-friendly.
Your primary trade-off is between portability and a fuller layout. If your desk space is limited, you travel frequently, or you prioritize a minimalist setup, the Ajazz AK650 is the logical pick. If you need immediate access to arrow and function keys for work or gaming, and value the feel of an aluminum chassis and PBT keycaps, the Attack Shark K86 offers more for a stationary setup at a similar price point.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Ajazz AK650
ATTACK SHARK K86
Layout size
65%
75%
Battery
5,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
Case material
ABS
Aluminum
Weight
670 g
930 g
Sound dampening
No
Yes
- Ajazz AK650
- ATTACK SHARK K86
- Performance
- 6069
- Build quality
- 6777
- Productivity
- 6786
- Customizability
- 7575
- Portability
- 8981
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Switch options: Linear
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
- Display: TFT
What will you mostly use it for?
The Attack Shark K86 wins in most productivity-focused categories like Office, Programming, and Content Creation due to its more complete 75% layout and premium materials. The Ajazz AK650 is the clear choice for Travel thanks to its smaller size, lighter weight, and larger battery. For Gaming and Modding, the decision is closer, with the K86 offering slight advantages in layout and documented modding features, while both support core customization.
Pick the ATTACK SHARK K86
- The Attack Shark K86 includes dedicated function keys and navigation cluster, which are useful for in-game macros and controls.
- Its listing mentions TTC E-Sport hot-swap sockets with improved stability, which may benefit frequent switch changes for gaming preferences.
- The aluminum case on the K86 may provide a more stable, vibration-resistant typing feel during intense sessions.
Ajazz AK650 vs ATTACK SHARK K86 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
6 of 20 specs differ
Ajazz AK650
ATTACK SHARK K86
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Ajazz AK650 vs ATTACK SHARK K86: your questions
The Ajazz AK650 is better for a small desk due to its more compact 65% layout. It measures 328mm in length, which is significantly shorter than the 380mm length of the Attack Shark K86, freeing up more space for your mouse or other items.
Based on the listed specifications, the Attack Shark K86 uses an aluminum case and PBT keycaps, which are generally considered more premium materials than the ABS case and unspecified keycaps on the Ajazz AK650. The K86's listing also emphasizes a gasket mount system with triple sound absorbing foam.
Yes, both the Ajazz AK650 and Attack Shark K86 are hot-swappable. Their product listings confirm full-key hot-swappability, and the K86 specifically mentions compatibility with both 3-pin and 5-pin switches via its TTC E-Sport sockets.
The Ajazz AK650 has a larger 5000mAh battery compared to the 4000mAh battery in the Attack Shark K86. While actual battery life depends on usage patterns like RGB brightness and connection mode, the AK650 has a higher capacity for potential longer wireless use.
Yes, both the Ajazz AK650 and Attack Shark K86 list Mac support among their extra features. Their vendor descriptions also explicitly state compatibility with both Windows and Mac systems.
The Ajazz AK650 is a 65% keyboard, which typically sacrifices the function row, navigation cluster, and sometimes dedicated arrow keys to maximize compactness. The Attack Shark K86 is a 75% keyboard, which retains the function row and dedicated arrow keys in a more condensed format than a full-size board.
The Attack Shark K86 is likely the quieter option based on its vendor description, which specifically highlights triple sound absorbing foam including EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad to dampen typing sounds. The Ajazz AK650's listing does not mention similar sound-dampening features.
Yes, both product listings include 'Knob Support' as an extra feature. The vendor descriptions for both the Ajazz AK650 and Attack Shark K86 mention a precision or CNC metal knob for controlling settings like volume or RGB effects.
Both keyboards come with linear switches. The Ajazz AK650 offers Ajazz Dream Weaving or Flying Fish linear switches, while the Attack Shark K86 comes with Custom Blue Whale linear switches. Specific actuation forces and travel distances are listed in their respective vendor pages.
According to its listing, the Attack Shark K86 package includes the keyboard, a 2.4G receiver, a Type-C cable, a keycap and switch puller, and a user manual. The inclusion of a puller is a convenience for immediate customization.
Both keyboards feature a TFT screen. The vendor descriptions indicate these screens can display system information like time and battery level. The Ajazz AK650 listing mentions support for custom color GIF animations, and the Attack Shark K86 listing mentions a custom GIF image, suggesting a degree of customization for both.
The Attack Shark K86 is noticeably heavier and more substantial, weighing 930g with an aluminum case. The Ajazz AK650 is lighter at 670g and uses an ABS plastic case, contributing to a less dense feel.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.










