ATTACK SHARK K86 vs MCHOSE G98 V2Compact Screen vs Full Layout
Choose the Attack Shark K86 for a compact, feature-rich portable option, or the MCHOSE G98 V2 for a full-layout productivity powerhouse with a huge battery.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
ATTACK SHARK K86
Compact Screen
Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.
- Features a smart TFT color display for status and customization.
- Aluminum case construction.
- More portable due to its 75% layout and lower 930g weight.
- No numpad.
Get the
MCHOSE G98 V2
Full Layout
Build quality in the top 35% of 98% boards under $100.
- 98% layout includes a numpad and near-full key set in a compact form.
- Massive 10000mAh battery capacity.
- Includes a dedicated one-click calculator shortcut key.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If you work with numbers, value long battery life, and need every key, the MCHOSE G98 V2's full layout is worth the extra size and weight. If you want a more portable, visually distinctive keyboard with a screen for your desk or bag, and can live without a numpad, the Attack Shark K86 is the better option. Both offer strong core features like gasket mounts, hot-swap, and tri-mode connectivity.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
ATTACK SHARK K86
MCHOSE G98 V2
Layout size
75%
98%
Battery
4,000 mAh
10,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Switch options
Linear
Clicky, Linear
Display
TFT
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
930 g
1,600 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- ATTACK SHARK K86
- MCHOSE G98 V2
- Performance
- 6880
- Build quality
- 7665
- Productivity
- 8585
- Customizability
- 7570
- Portability
- 8165
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The MCHOSE G98 V2 is the clear choice for office work and content creation where a numpad, calculator key, and robust audio controls are valuable. The Attack Shark K86 wins for travel and gaming where its lighter weight and smaller footprint are advantages. For programming and modding, the choice is more nuanced, leaning on layout preference and specific modding features like the G98 V2's screw-in stabilizers.
Pick the ATTACK SHARK K86
- More compact 75% layout frees up mouse space.
- Lighter weight at 930g for easier repositioning.
- Aluminum case may provide a more solid base.
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs MCHOSE G98 V2 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 22 specs differ
ATTACK SHARK K86
MCHOSE G98 V2
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs MCHOSE G98 V2: your questions
The MCHOSE G98 V2 has a significantly larger 10000mAh battery compared to the Attack Shark K86's 4000mAh battery. This should translate to much longer wireless usage between charges for the G98 V2.
No, the Attack Shark K86 uses a 75% layout, which does not include a numpad. It retains the function row and some navigation keys but omits the numpad and some other keys to save space.
According to the vendor, the Attack Shark K86's TFT display shows keyboard status like connection mode, battery level, date, and time. It can also display custom GIF images and is used in conjunction with the knob for adjusting settings.
Yes, both keyboards are hot-swappable. The Attack Shark K86 uses TTC E-Sport sockets compatible with 3-pin and 5-pin switches. The MCHOSE G98 V2 is also hot-swappable, allowing for easy switch replacement.
The Attack Shark K86 is better for small desks. Its 75% layout (35 x 380 x 150 mm) is substantially more compact than the MCHOSE G98 V2's 98% layout (55 x 440 x 187 mm), freeing up considerable space for your mouse and other items.
Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and MCHOSE G98 V2 list Mac and Windows support in their specifications, making them compatible with both operating systems.
Both keyboards use a gasket mount system. The vendor for the K86 mentions it uses a PC plate and added gaskets for a bouncy feel. The G98 V2 vendor also specifies a gasket-mounted structure with a PC Flex-Cut Plate.
The vendor lists the MCHOSE G98 V2 as available with either TTC Flame Orange linear switches or HUANO Ice Blue switches. The product metadata also indicates it offers both linear and clicky switch types.
Both are well-damped. The Attack Shark K86 vendor lists triple sound absorbing foam including EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad. The MCHOSE G98 V2 vendor lists PO silencer cotton, an IXPE switch bottom pad, a PET pad, silicone bottom foam, and bottom cotton.
Both keyboards feature a knob. The Attack Shark K86 has a CNC metal knob for adjusting settings. The MCHOSE G98 V2 has a dedicated volume wheel for audio control that also includes a mute function and an ambient RGB indicator.
Both keyboards use PBT keycaps, which are durable and resistant to shine. The Attack Shark K86 vendor specifically mentions they are double-shot PBT keycaps, a manufacturing method that leads to long-lasting legends.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.