Compare AULA F87 Pro V2 vs M75 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between AULA's full-size and compact wireless offerings. The F87 Pro V2 offers a traditional layout and exceptional battery life, while the M75 provides a space-saving design with a more premium aluminum chassis. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize desk space and material quality or need a dedicated number pad and longer wireless runtime.

Model
			Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2025 Equipped with a 12000 mAh battery Sized at 42 x 362 x 138 mm Made with a Metal case	Released in 2024 Available in a 75% layout Equipped with a 8000 mAh battery Weighs about 1735 g Made with a Aluminum case
Score	Scores Performance: 55 Build Quality: 57.6 Productivity: 46.1 Customizability: 53.5 Portability: 47.6	Scores Performance: 48 Build Quality: 54.8 Productivity: 50.7 Customizability: 52.8 Portability: 85.6
Name	Name AULA F87 Pro V2	Name AULA M75
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options -	Switch Options -
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size Unknown	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 12000 mAh	Battery capacity 8000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Metal	Case Material Aluminum
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 42 x 362 x 138 mm	Dimensions -
Weight	Weight -	Weight 1735g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary need dictates the choice. If you require a number pad for work, value maximum battery life, and have the desk space, the AULA F87 Pro V2 is the logical pick. Opt for the AULA M75 if you want a denser, more premium aluminum build, need the desk space for gaming, and value the explicitly stated low-latency performance.

AULA F87 Pro V2

+Massive 12000mAh battery with vendor-claimed 80-hour runtime.
+Full-size layout includes a dedicated number pad.
+Metal case construction for durability.
+Hot-swappable switches allow for customization.
+Tri-mode connectivity (Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, wired) offers flexibility.

−Larger footprint consumes more desk space.
−Vendor descriptions lack detailed internal construction specifics compared to the M75.
−No specific latency figures are provided in its vendor description.

AULA M75

+Compact 75% layout saves considerable desk space.
+CNC-machined 6063 series aluminum alloy chassis for a premium feel.
+Vendor-specified 3ms ultra-low latency for wireless performance.
+Detailed five-layered internal padding with sandwich and IXPE foam.
+Leaf-spring gasket mount and single-key slotted FR4/PC plate for typing comfort.

−Smaller 8000mAh battery, though still high capacity.
−Lacks a dedicated number pad.
−Heavier weight (1735g) due to the aluminum construction.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The AULA M75 takes the lead for gaming and travel due to its specified low latency and compact form factor, while also offering more detailed internal construction for modders. The AULA F87 Pro V2 is better suited for office work and content creation where its full layout and massive battery are major assets. For programming, the choice is a tie, boiling down to layout preference, as both share core customization features.

GamingAULA M75

•The M75 vendor page specifies a 3ms ultra-low latency response time for its wireless connection.
•Its compact 75% layout frees up more desk space for mouse movement.
•The aluminum case may provide a more stable, robust platform.

OfficeAULA F87 Pro V2

•The F87 Pro V2's full-size layout includes a dedicated number pad for data entry.
•Its larger 12000mAh battery promises up to 80 hours of use per the vendor, reducing charging frequency.
•The vendor description positions it for professional environments.

ProgrammingTie

•Both keyboards feature hot-swappable switches for customizing typing feel.
•Both use PBT keycaps for durability.
•The choice depends on personal preference for a full layout (F87) or a more compact setup (M75).

TravelAULA M75

•The M75's 75% layout is significantly more compact, with dimensions not provided for the larger F87.
•It is lighter at 1735g, though still substantial due to its aluminum build.
•Its 8000mAh battery is still large for a portable keyboard.

ModdingAULA M75

•The M75 vendor page details a five-layered internal padded structure with sandwich and IXPE foam.
•It uses a single-key slotted FR4 or PC positioning plate for consistent typing feel.
•It features a leaf-spring gasket mount, which the vendor describes as soft and cushiony.

Content CreationAULA F87 Pro V2

•The full-size layout of the F87 Pro V2 is advantageous for shortcut-heavy workflows that may use the number pad.
•The vendor claims its 12000mAh battery provides up to 80 hours of runtime for long editing sessions.
•The metal case construction contributes to a stable typing experience.