Which one should you get?
Get the
Cidoo QK61 V2
60%
- Extensive firmware support with both VIA and QMK for deep customization.
- More portable due to its 60% layout and lower weight (880g).
- Detailed five-layer sound dampening construction including PET film and silicone pad.
- 60% layout lacks dedicated arrow keys, function row, and navigation cluster.
- Smaller 3000mAh battery compared to the AULA F75.
- No explicitly stated gaming features like a high polling rate or Rapid Trigger.
Get the
AULA F75
75% Layout Choice
- More functional 75% layout with arrow keys, function row, and a multimedia knob.
- Larger 4000mAh battery for longer wireless use.
- Includes gaming-oriented features like a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support.
- Larger and heavier (1023g) than the 60% alternative, less portable.
- Software support is listed as Windows-only, according to the vendor downloads.
- Lacks the open-source VIA/QMK firmware support of the QK61 V2.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If you value the smallest possible footprint for travel or a desk, and you want the extensive customization offered by VIA and QMK, the Cidoo QK61 V2 is the clear pick. If you need a more complete layout for daily productivity and gaming, with convenient features like a knob and explicitly stated gaming optimizations, the AULA F75 is the more practical and versatile keyboard for most users.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Cidoo QK61 V2
AULA F75
Layout size
60%
75%
Battery
3,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
Switch options
Clicky, Linear
Linear, Silent
Knob
No
Yes
QMK
Yes
No
- Cidoo QK61 V2
- AULA F75
- Performance
- 4364
- Build quality
- 7066
- Productivity
- 7192
- Customizability
- 8182
- Portability
- 8482
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Plastic
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 is the more versatile choice for general productivity, gaming, and office use due to its more complete 75% layout and included gaming features. The Cidoo QK61 V2 excels in specific niches: its ultra-compact 60% form factor is ideal for travel, and its support for VIA and QMK makes it a superior platform for keyboard enthusiasts who prioritize deep customization and modding. For content creation, the knob on the F75 is a tangible advantage, but the macro capabilities of the QK61 V2 offer a different kind of utility.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support, which are explicitly mentioned gaming features.
- Its 75% layout retains arrow keys and a function row useful for in-game macros and controls without layers.
- It includes a multimedia control knob for quick audio adjustments during gameplay.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Cidoo QK61 V2
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Cidoo QK61 V2 vs AULA F75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 26 specs differ
Cidoo QK61 V2
AULA F75
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Cidoo QK61 V2 vs AULA F75: your questions
The AULA F75 has explicit gaming advantages. Its product listing specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support, which are aimed at reducing input latency. The 75% layout also provides immediate access to arrow keys and function keys, which are often used for in-game controls and macros without needing modifier layers.
Yes, the Cidoo QK61 V2 supports VIA and QMK firmware. According to the manufacturer, this allows for key remapping, macro creation, and backlighting management. This offers a high degree of customization directly through open-source software.
The AULA F75 lists Mac/Win support in its extra features, indicating basic compatibility. However, the downloadable software utilities from the vendor page are noted as only supporting Windows, which may limit configuration options on macOS.
The AULA F75 has a larger 4000mAh battery compared to the 3000mAh battery in the Cidoo QK61 V2. While actual runtime depends on usage and lighting, the F75's larger capacity suggests the potential for longer periods between charges.
Both use Cherry profile, double-shot PBT keycaps for durability. The Cidoo QK61 V2 also includes two transparent PC keycaps as accents. The AULA F75's vendor page notes that LED direction (north or south-facing) depends on the keycap version purchased.
Yes, both keyboards are hot-swappable. The Cidoo QK61 V2's description states compatibility with most 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches. The AULA F75 also lists full-key hot-swap functionality, allowing for easy switch replacement.
The AULA F75 offers silent linear switch options directly, which are designed to be quieter. Both boards feature internal sound dampening (five layers in each, according to descriptions), but the availability of silent switches gives the F75 an edge for noise-sensitive environments.
The Cidoo QK61 V2 uses a polycarbonate (PC) plate, which its vendor description states provides a flexible and deep-sounding typing experience. The AULA F75's plate material is not specified in the provided details, so a direct comparison on feel cannot be made.
Yes, both the Cidoo QK61 V2 and the AULA F75 utilize a gasket mount design. This mounting style isolates the plate and PCB from the case using silicone or foam gaskets, typically aimed at providing a softer, more consistent typing feel and reducing case vibration.
The vendor description for the AULA F75 states the knob is for multimedia control, offering convenient adjustment. There is no information provided about reprogramming its function to other actions, unlike the fully programmable keys on the VIA-supported QK61 V2.
According to their vendor pages, both keyboards include a USB cable, a 2.4G dongle, and a keycap/switch puller. The Cidoo QK61 V2 also lists an instruction manual, while the AULA F75 lists a user manual.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.












![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)