Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F99
Compact 96%
- More compact 96% layout saves desk space while retaining most keys.
- Includes rapid trigger functionality for gaming.
- Offers a choice between PC and FR4 plates for different typing feels.
- Lacks a dedicated numpad, which some users require.
- No adjustable kickstand or listed typing angles for ergonomic adjustment.
- Driver software is listed as only supporting Windows.
Get the
Epomaker TH108
Full-Size Layout
- Full 100% layout with numpad for data entry and dedicated navigation keys.
- Includes a 2-stage adjustable kickstand for three typing angles (6°, 8°, 10.5°).
- Lists specific latency figures (2ms wired) and a 1000Hz polling rate for responsive performance.
- Larger and heavier, making it less portable.
- Uses plate-mounted stabilizers, which may not be as stable as screw-in types for modders.
- Some user reviews note that side-printed keycap legends can be hard to read in low light.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If you value a smaller footprint for gaming or travel and want features like rapid trigger, the AULA F99 is the clear pick. If you require a full numpad for work, prefer adjustable typing angles, and want detailed performance specs, the Epomaker TH108 is the better full-size option. Both deliver a quality gasket-mounted typing experience with strong wireless capabilities.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F99
Epomaker TH108
Layout size
96%
100%
Rapid trigger
Yes
No
Case material
ABS, PBT, Plastic
ABS
Switch options
Linear
Linear, Silent
Weight
1,023 g
1,200 g
- AULA F99
- Epomaker TH108
- Performance
- 5875
- Build quality
- 5760
- Productivity
- 8777
- Customizability
- 6559
- Portability
- 6263
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 8,000 mAh
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F99 wins for gaming and travel due to its compact size and rapid trigger feature, while the Epomaker TH108 is better suited for office work and content creation with its full numpad and adjustable ergonomics. For programming, the choice is a tie and depends on personal layout preference. Modders will find more potential in the AULA F99 due to its plate options and screw-in stabilizers.
Pick the AULA F99
- The AULA F99 lists rapid trigger functionality, a feature not mentioned for the TH108.
- Its 96% layout is more compact, potentially freeing up more desk space for mouse movement.
- North-facing RGB LEDs, as listed, may offer better compatibility with certain aftermarket keycap sets.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F99
33 owner reviews
“I am really enjoying using AULA f99! UX is 10/10 The only negative thing is the battery indicator, I find it quite confusing therefore I turned it off alltogether.”
“Good product - poor service. The order wasnt filed and the stock ran out. Then for the replacement item to be filled it took way too long for the order to arrive and complete a customer build.”
Epomaker TH108
47 owner reviews
“My first mechanical keyboard. A lot of people like the clack of some keyboards. I prefer the silent switches. This keyboard is great and works very well.”
“Its very cool, I just wish I had picked the silent switch version instead. :/”
AULA F99 vs Epomaker TH108 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 24 specs differ
AULA F99
Epomaker TH108
Switch options
Rapid trigger
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F99 vs Epomaker TH108: your questions
The AULA F99 is better for small desks. It uses a 96% layout that is significantly shorter (391mm long) than the Epomaker TH108 (445mm long), saving valuable space while keeping arrow and function keys.
Yes, the Epomaker TH108 is a 100% full-sized keyboard. Its layout includes a dedicated numpad with 108 keys total, making it suitable for data entry, accounting, or any task that benefits from number pad input.
Yes, both the AULA F99 and Epomaker TH108 feature hot-swappable PCBs. This allows you to change the mechanical switches without soldering, using the included switch puller tool. Both are compatible with standard 5-pin switches.
The AULA F99 is more portable. It is lighter at 1023 grams compared to the TH108's 1200 grams, and its 96% layout is more compact. Both have the same 8000mAh battery for long wireless use on the go.
Rapid trigger is a feature listed for the AULA F99. It allows a key to be re-pressed without it returning to its full resting position, which can be beneficial for fast-paced gaming where rapid, successive keystrokes are needed.
Yes. According to its technical specifications, the Epomaker TH108 has a 2-stage adjustable kickstand. This provides three different typing angles: 6, 8, and 10.5 degrees, offering ergonomic flexibility.
The keycaps are PBT and double-shot on the TH108, but the legends are side-printed according to some user reviews, meaning the top of the keycap may not be illuminated. The AULA F99 uses north-facing LEDs, but the keycap legend style is not specified in the provided information.
Both keyboards are listed with large 8000mAh rechargeable batteries. The Epomaker TH108 vendor description claims up to 160 hours of wireless battery life, but actual runtime will depend on usage patterns and RGB lighting settings.
The Epomaker TH108 may be better for a quiet office as it explicitly offers a 'Sea Salt Silent' linear switch option. Both boards also feature five layers of sound-dampening foam to reduce typing noise.
Yes, both the AULA F99 and Epomaker TH108 list Mac and Windows support in their extra features. They connect via USB-C, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz wireless for compatibility with various devices.
The AULA F99 has north-facing LEDs (LEDs on the top side of the switch), while the Epomaker TH108 has south-facing LEDs (LEDs on the bottom). This can affect the way light shines through keycaps and may influence compatibility with certain Cherry-profile keycap sets.
The AULA F99 lists screw-in stabilizers, which are generally preferred by modders for their stability and ease of tuning. The Epomaker TH108 uses plate-mounted stabilizers, which the manufacturer states are not compatible with PCB or screw-in types.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.












