Compare AULA F99 vs MCHOSE K99 V2 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two popular 98% wireless mechanical keyboards. The choice is difficult because both offer gasket mounts, hot-swappable sockets, and large 8000mAh batteries. The AULA F99 is a lighter, plastic-bodied keyboard with a lower starting price and rapid trigger support. The MCHOSE K99 V2 is significantly heavier with an aluminum case, a specified 8000 Hz polling rate, and a low-profile ergonomic option. Your decision hinges on prioritizing material feel and gaming specs versus weight, cost, and specific gaming features.

Model
	-10% off 70		Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	4.8 stars (52 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2023 Supports hot-swappable switches Compatible with both Mac and Windows Connects via USB-C Enables rapid trigger functionality Includes screw-in stabilizers Has built-in sound dampening Supports Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless connectivity Weighs about 1023 g Sized at 43 x 147 x 391 mm Made with a ABS, Plastic, PBT case Offers Yes, Rgb, North-face, Rgb North-face RGB lighting	Released in 2025 Features a low-profile design Supports Wireless connectivity Made with a Aluminum case Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 58 Build Quality: 56.7 Productivity: 86.8 Customizability: 65.9 Portability: 62.3	Scores Performance: 43.2 Build Quality: 50.6 Productivity: 43.2 Customizability: 46.1 Portability: 56
Name	Name AULA F99	Name MCHOSE K99 V2
Release year	Release year 2023	Release year 2025
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear	Switch Options Linear
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Low Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 96%	Layout Size 96%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 8000 mAh	Battery capacity 8000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb, North-face	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material ABS, Plastic, PBT	Case Material Aluminum
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 43 x 147 x 391 mm	Dimensions -
Weight	Weight 1023g	Weight -

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your priority should guide this choice. If you value a premium, heavy aluminum build and a specified high polling rate for gaming, the MCHOSE K99 V2 is the stronger candidate. If you prefer a lighter, more portable keyboard with a detailed sound-dampening design, rapid trigger support, and a potentially lower cost, the AULA F99 is the better pick. Both are competent wireless 98% keyboards, making material and specific feature trade-offs the deciding factors.

AULA F99

+Includes a rapid trigger feature for gaming, as listed in its specifications.
+Lighter weight (1023g) makes it more portable than the aluminum alternative.
+Vendor description details a five-layer sound dampening system for acoustic customization.
+Offers a choice between PC and FR4 plates according to the product listing.
+North-facing RGB LEDs provide compatibility with a wider range of keycap profiles.

−Case is constructed from ABS plastic, which may feel less premium than metal.
−Does not have a specified polling rate in its provided metadata.
−Lacks the low-profile ergonomic option offered by the MCHOSE.

MCHOSE K99 V2

+Features an aluminum case, offering a more premium material feel.
+Specifies an 8000 Hz polling rate for potentially lower latency.
+Offers a low-profile ergonomic design option, according to its layout specifications.
+Includes a surround RGB light strip in addition to per-key lighting.
+Vendor description mentions a six-layer gasket structure with specific foams like poron and anti-static PET.

−Substantially heavier at 1690g, reducing portability.
−South-facing RGB LEDs may cause interference with some Cherry-profile keycaps.
−No rapid trigger feature is mentioned in its provided specifications.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The MCHOSE K99 V2 takes a slight lead for gaming due to its specified high polling rate and aluminum construction. For travel, the significantly lighter AULA F99 is the clear winner. Modders may prefer the AULA F99 for its well-documented internal foam layers. For office work, programming, and content creation, the keyboards are closely matched, sharing core features like the efficient layout, massive battery, and wireless flexibility.

GamingMCHOSE K99 V2

•The MCHOSE K99 V2 lists an 8000 Hz polling rate, which the AULA F99's specifications do not mention.
•The MCHOSE K99 V2's aluminum case may provide a more stable typing platform.
•The AULA F99 does offer a rapid trigger feature, which is advantageous for certain gaming styles.

OfficeTie

•Both have a 98% layout with a numpad for data entry.
•Both offer tri-mode connectivity (Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, USB-C) for multi-device use.
•Both feature large 8000mAh batteries for extended wireless use.
•Both list Mac and Windows support.

ProgrammingTie

•The 98% layout on both provides arrow keys and a numpad for efficient navigation.
•Both are hot-swappable, allowing programmers to customize switch feel.
•Both offer software for key remapping and macro creation, according to their vendor pages.

TravelAULA F99

•The AULA F99 is notably lighter at 1023g compared to the MCHOSE K99 V2's 1690g.
•Both have the same compact 98% footprint, but the AULA's lower weight is more portable.
•Both include a 2.4GHz receiver and USB-C cable for connectivity on the go.

ModdingAULA F99

•The AULA F99 vendor description details a five-layer sound dampening system (sandwich foam, IXPE switch pad, PET film, bottom foam, silicone pad), offering a clear modding baseline.
•Both are hot-swappable and support switch customization.
•The AULA F99 offers a choice of PC or FR4 plates from the vendor, providing acoustic variety out of the box.

Content CreationTie

•Both keyboards offer extensive RGB lighting with per-key and ambient options for stream aesthetics.
•Software for both allows macro programming, which can streamline editing workflows.
•The full layout on both is suitable for shortcut-heavy applications.