Epomaker Hack 59 vs LUMA100Compact or 96%
Choose the Hack 59 for a compact, QMK-enabled board with PBT caps, or the LUMA100 for a 100-key low-profile layout and aluminum case.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.7 · 18 reviews
from$48at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
5.0 · 5 reviews
from$95at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Hack 59
QMK
Build quality in the top 10% of 60% boards under $50.
- 60% ANSI layout with 59 keys and compact dimensions of 28 x 119 x 303 mm.
- QMK and VIA support, with hot-swap sockets for 3- and 5-pin mechanical switches described by Epomaker.
- PBT keycaps and south-facing per-key RGB.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker LUMA100
Build quality in the top 25% of 96% boards under $100.
- 96% ANSI 100-key layout with number pad, navigation cluster, and arrow keys.
- Anodized aluminum case, polycarbonate plate, and gasket mount.
- Low-profile linear switches, with hot-swap support for certain 3- and 5-pin low-profile mechanical switches.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.
Pick the Hack 59 if you prioritize a small footprint, QMK support, and PBT keycaps, and are comfortable using layers in place of dedicated arrow keys and a numpad. Choose the LUMA100 if the number pad and navigation cluster matter more, or you specifically want a low-profile keyboard with an aluminum case. Before buying the LUMA100, account for its low-profile-only switch and keycap compatibility.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Hack 59
Epomaker LUMA100
Layout size
60%
96%
Low profile
No
Yes
Case material
ABS
Aluminum
Weight
630 g
620 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
QMK
Yes
No
The deep option when you want to remap every key
- Epomaker Hack 59
- Epomaker LUMA100
- Performance
- 6466
- Build quality
- 8177
- Productivity
- 8182
- Customizability
- 8973
- Portability
- 8754
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 3,000 mAh
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- VIA
What will you mostly use it for?
The Hack 59 has the edge for QMK-based customization and compact setups, while the LUMA100 is a more complete choice when frequent number-pad and navigation-key access matters. Gaming is a close call: both share the listed polling rate and three connection modes, but the compact and low-profile layouts create different preferences. For travel, the Hack 59 is substantially shorter in its listed dimensions, though the two have similar listed weights. Modding favors the Hack 59's QMK support and broader stated switch fit, while the LUMA100 suits buyers who want its low-profile format and aluminum case.
It's a tie
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and wired, 2.4 GHz, and Bluetooth connectivity.
- The Hack 59 has a compact 59-key layout and linear switches; the LUMA100 uses low-profile linear switches and a 100-key layout.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Hack 59
18 owner reviews
“This keyboard sounds great and has amazing performance! One of the best ive ever used”
Epomaker LUMA100
5 owner reviews
“great keyboard. the O wasn’t working initially but i just swapped it out with the extras in the set. love the feel and customization of it”
Epomaker Hack 59 vs LUMA100 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 24 specs differ
Epomaker Hack 59
Epomaker LUMA100
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Hack 59 vs LUMA100: your questions
The Hack 59 is a 59-key 60% ANSI keyboard with QMK and VIA support. The LUMA100 is a 100-key 96% ANSI low-profile keyboard with a number pad, navigation cluster, and arrow keys.
No. Its 60% layout does not include a numpad or dedicated arrow keys, according to the compatibility notes.
Yes. The LUMA100's 100-key layout includes a number pad, navigation cluster, and arrow keys. It is described as a compact full-size layout without the gaps of a full-size board.
The Hack 59 lists both QMK and VIA support. The LUMA100 lists VIA support, but its product details do not list QMK support.
No. The LUMA100's compatibility notes specify low-profile switches and keycaps only, and say standard MX keycaps will not fit.
Both are listed as hot-swappable. Epomaker specifies 3- and 5-pin mechanical switch compatibility for the Hack 59, while the LUMA100 supports certain 3- and 5-pin low-profile mechanical switches.
The Hack 59 is the smaller format, with a 60% layout and listed dimensions of 28 x 119 x 303 mm. The LUMA100 has a 96% layout and listed dimensions of 26 x 371 x 129 mm.
Yes. Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity, along with a 3000mAh battery.
The LUMA100 has an anodized aluminum case and a polycarbonate plate. The Hack 59 has an ABS case and a plastic plate.
The Hack 59 is listed with PBT keycaps. The LUMA100 uses ABS low-profile keycaps with a DSA profile, according to its product details.
The LUMA100's compatibility notes warn that Cherry-profile keycaps can hit its north-facing switch housing. Its keycaps are specified as low-profile DSA, so check keycap fit before replacing them.
The Hack 59 is the more direct fit if QMK support and programmable layers are priorities, and Epomaker specifically describes it for coding workflows. The LUMA100 provides dedicated arrow keys and a number pad, which may suit workflows that use those keys frequently.
Not sold on either?
![[In Stock] Lucky65 V2 65% Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/20250324144508.jpg?v=1742798796&width=3840&quality=75)
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.