Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 31, 2026

Epomaker LUMA100 vs Split 65Full Layout or Split

Choose the LUMA100 for a low-profile keyboard with a numpad, or the Split 65 for an adjustable split layout and broader switch compatibility.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

EPOMAKER LUMA100

Epomaker LUMA100

5.0 · 5 reviews

from$95at Epomaker

90-day low

EPOMAKER Split 65

Epomaker Split 65

4.9 · 62 reviews

from$101at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker LUMA100

Build quality in the top 25% of 96% boards under $100.

If you want

  • 96% layout includes a numpad, navigation cluster, and arrow keys.
  • Anodized aluminum case, polycarbonate plate, and gasket mount.
  • Tri-mode Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity with a 3000mAh battery.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
  • Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.

Get the

Epomaker Split 65

Build quality in the top 35% of 65% boards under $150.

If you want

  • Adjustable split design lets the two halves be positioned for typing.
  • QMK and VIA support for key remapping, macros, and layers.
  • Hot-swappable sockets support 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Bottom line

Choose the LUMA100 if you want a low-profile, gasket-mounted board with a numpad, aluminum case, and lower listed weight. Choose the Split 65 if adjustable split positioning and QMK support matter more, or if you want hot-swap compatibility with 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches. Check the keycap compatibility limits before buying either model.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker LUMA100

Epomaker Split 65

  • Layout size

    96%

    65%

  • Low profile

    Yes

    No

  • Ergonomics

    Standard

    Split

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    ABS, Metal

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    Top Mount

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker LUMA100
  • Epomaker Split 65
Performance
66
74
Build quality
77
72
Productivity
82
88
Customizability
73
86
Portability
54
89

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Battery: 3,000 mAh
  • Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
  • VIA
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The LUMA100 is the more straightforward fit for office work, numeric input, and buyers who want a compact full-layout board. The Split 65 stands out for programming and switch experimentation, with its split halves, QMK support, and standard 3-pin and 5-pin switch compatibility. For gaming, the Split 65 has the clearer feature advantage in N-Key Rollover, though both list a 1000 Hz polling rate. The LUMA100 is lighter, while neither product has evidence here of a special travel-oriented case or carry feature.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker Split 65

  • Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate, and the Split 65 also specifies N-Key Rollover.
  • The Split 65 uses linear switches and has 1000 Hz polling over USB and 2.4 GHz according to its product details.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Epomaker LUMA100

5.0

5 owner reviews

Praise
“great keyboard. the O wasn’t working initially but i just swapped it out with the extras in the set. love the feel and customization of it”
Denny M.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Epomaker Split 65

4.9

62 owner reviews

Praise
“I instantly fell in love with this keyboard despite never having tried a split before. I really hope Epo comes out with more split models and colors!”
Michael M.Verified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“Several keys on this keyboard double type, causing two letters to type instead of one. The fixes suggested by customer service have not resolved this, nor has changing the repeat delay or repeat rate settings as was suggested online. Otherwise it's a good…”
Elle F.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

Epomaker LUMA100 vs Split 65 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

13 of 25 specs differ

Epomaker LUMA100

Epomaker Split 65

Typing & switches

Switch options

—
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Top Mount

Low profile

Yes
No

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

96%
65%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Split

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
1,000 Hz

Battery

3,000 mAh
3,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS, Metal

Plate material

Polycarbonate
Plastic

Keycaps

ABS
PBT

Weight

620 g
800 g

Dimensions

26 x 371 x 129 mm
27 x 375 x 264 mm

Typing angle

—
7°

Backlight

RGB, north-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

QMK

No
Yes

VIA

Yes
Yes

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2026
2024

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker LUMA100 vs Split 65: your questions

The LUMA100 is a 96% low-profile keyboard with a numpad, while the Split 65 is a 65% keyboard with adjustable split halves. The LUMA100 uses a gasket mount and aluminum case; the Split 65 uses a top mount and ABS and metal case materials.

No, the Split 65 has a 65% layout, and its compatibility details specify that it has no numpad. The LUMA100's 96% layout includes one.

The Split 65 is the model designed around split typing, with adjustable halves and a listed typing angle of about 7°. The LUMA100 instead has a low-profile chassis and gasket mount.

No, the LUMA100's compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.

Yes, the Split 65 is hot-swappable and supports 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches. Its top-mount construction and plate-mount stabilizers are separate build details, not switch-socket restrictions.

Yes, both keyboards list VIA support. The Split 65 also lists QMK support, while the LUMA100's vendor description says VIA can remap keys and record macros.

The LUMA100 is listed at 620g, while the Split 65 is listed at 800g. The LUMA100 is therefore the lighter option by the listed weights.

Yes, both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. Each also has a 3000mAh battery.

The LUMA100 has a numpad in its 96% layout, and its vendor description identifies a navigation cluster and arrow keys. The Split 65 has no numpad or function row.

The LUMA100 has north-facing RGB, but its compatibility rules warn that Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing. The Split 65 has south-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rules say shine-through legends stay dark.

The Split 65 supports QMK and VIA and accepts hot-swappable 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches. The LUMA100 supports VIA and hot-swapping too, but it is limited to low-profile switches and keycaps.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.