Epomaker Luma40 vs Split 65Ortho or Split Layout
Choose the Luma40 for a very compact low-profile ortholinear board, or the Split 65 for adjustable split typing and a more conventional 65% layout.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.9 · 62 reviews
from$101at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- CNC-cut aluminum case with a polycarbonate plate.
- 40% ortholinear layout in a low-profile form.
- Tri-mode connectivity, 1450mAh battery, and 1000 Hz polling listed.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker Split 65
Battery
Build quality in the top 35% of 65% boards under $150.
- Adjustable split design lets the two halves be positioned for typing.
- 65% ANSI layout with 68 keys and dual 3U split spacebars.
- 3000mAh battery, tri-mode connectivity, and 1000 Hz polling listed.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
Pick the Luma40 if minimizing desk and travel footprint matters most, and you are comfortable with low-profile-only switches and a 40% layout. Choose the Split 65 if you want adjustable split positioning, more keys, and standard-height PBT keycaps. Both support wireless modes, hot-swap switches, QMK, and VIA, so layout and physical form are the clearest deciding factors.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker Split 65
Layout size
40%
65%
Battery
1,450 mAh
3,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
Yes
No
Ergonomics
Ortholinear
Split
Case material
Aluminum
ABS, Metal
- Epomaker Luma40
- Epomaker Split 65
- Performance
- 7474
- Build quality
- 8172
- Productivity
- 8888
- Customizability
- 8586
- Portability
- 8589
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- QMK
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Split 65 is the more straightforward fit for office and programming setups that benefit from a split layout and additional keys. The Luma40 takes the travel advantage through its lower listed weight and smaller dimensions, and may appeal to desk-focused creators who want an aluminum, low-profile board. Gaming and modding are close calls: both provide wireless options, 1000 Hz polling in wired and 2.4 GHz modes, and programmable hot-swap designs, but their layouts and switch formats differ.
It's a tie
- Both list 1000 Hz polling over wired and 2.4 GHz connections, along with N-Key Rollover.
- The Luma40 is a 40% layout with no dedicated arrow keys, while the Split 65 is 65% and has more keys.
- Both offer linear switch options, though the Luma40 also lists clicky switches.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker Split 65
62 owner reviews
“I instantly fell in love with this keyboard despite never having tried a split before. I really hope Epo comes out with more split models and colors!”
“Several keys on this keyboard double type, causing two letters to type instead of one. The fixes suggested by customer service have not resolved this, nor has changing the repeat delay or repeat rate settings as was suggested online. Otherwise it's a good…”
Epomaker Luma40 vs Split 65 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 25 specs differ
Epomaker Luma40
Epomaker Split 65
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Luma40 vs Split 65: your questions
The Luma40 is a 40% low-profile ortholinear keyboard with a CNC-cut aluminum case. The Split 65 is a 65% keyboard with adjustable split halves, PBT keycaps, and a 3000mAh battery.
Yes. The Luma40 is listed at 410 g and 21 x 240 x 87 mm, while the Split 65 is listed at 800 g and 27 x 375 x 264 mm. The Luma40 is the more compact option based on those listed measurements.
The Split 65 is designed around adjustable split halves that let each hand sit at a preferred angle. The Luma40 instead has an ortholinear, low-profile layout and a flat typing angle.
No. The Luma40 compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps, and standard MX keycaps will not fit. Its north-facing LEDs may also interfere with Cherry-profile keycaps.
Both keyboards list QMK and VIA support. The Luma40 vendor description says VIA can be used for macros, remaps, and layouts, while the Split 65 description also mentions customizing layers.
Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. Each also lists USB-C among its features.
The Split 65 has a listed 3000mAh battery, compared with 1450mAh for the Luma40. The Luma40 vendor description gives battery life estimates of up to 75 hours with RGB off and 7 hours with RGB on.
Both are hot-swappable. The Luma40 uses low-profile switch sockets, while the Split 65 supports 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
The Split 65 offers a 65% layout with 68 keys and supports QMK and VIA, making it the more conventional choice for buyers wanting more physical keys. The Luma40 also supports QMK and VIA, but its 40% layout has no dedicated function row or arrow keys.
The Split 65 has south-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rules warn that shine-through legends stay dark. Some sculpted keycaps can also clip the LEDs.
The Luma40 lists an aluminum case, polycarbonate plate, and PC keycaps. The Split 65 lists ABS and metal for its case materials, a plastic plate, and PBT keycaps.
The Luma40 is easier to carry based on its listed 410 g weight and smaller dimensions. The Split 65 weighs 800 g and has a wider split form.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.