Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 31, 2026

Epomaker Luma40 vs Magcore65 Lite40% or 65%

Choose the Luma40 for its aluminum 40% ortholinear form and QMK/VIA support, or the Magcore65 Lite for 8K wired polling and a 65% layout with arrow keys.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

EPOMAKER LUMA40

Epomaker Luma40

5.0 · 3 reviews

from$92at Epomaker

90-day low

EPOMAKER Magcore65 Lite

Hall effect

Epomaker Magcore65 Lite

4.8 · 10 reviews

from$43at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker Luma40

Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.

If you want

  • CNC aluminum case with a polycarbonate plate.
  • 40% ortholinear, low-profile layout in a 410g, 240 x 87 mm body.
  • QMK and VIA support for remapping, macros, and layout changes.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Get the

Epomaker Magcore65 Lite

Hall effect

Build quality in the top 50% of 65% boards under $50.

If you want

  • 8K polling over wired connection and inductive analog switches.
  • 65% layout retains arrow keys and offers 66 keys.
  • Gasket mount with FR4 plate, Sandwich Latex Foam, IXPE switch pad, PCB Latex Pad, and bottom silicone.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Bottom line

Pick the Luma40 if the priority is a compact ortholinear board with QMK/VIA, CNC aluminum, and low-profile typing. Choose the Magcore65 Lite if gaming features, 8K wired polling, arrow keys, and a larger battery matter more. Before buying, check switch and keycap compatibility carefully: neither board accepts standard MX switches, and their LED orientations impose different keycap caveats.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker Luma40

Epomaker Magcore65 Lite

  • Layout size

    40%

    65%

  • Hall effect (magnetic)

    No

    Yes

    Adjustable actuation helps in games and not in normal typing

  • Battery

    1,450 mAh

    4,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Low profile

    Yes

    No

  • Ergonomics

    Ortholinear

    Standard

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker Luma40
  • Epomaker Magcore65 Lite
Performance
74
90
Build quality
81
66
Productivity
88
68
Customizability
85
67
Portability
85
87

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Magcore65 Lite is the more gaming-oriented option, with higher wired polling and dedicated analog-key functions. The Luma40 takes the lead for travel, programming customization, and a distinctly compact desk setup, but its 40% layout requires accepting the absence of dedicated arrows and a function row. The same QMK/VIA support and ortholinear layout make the Luma40 more adaptable for key remapping. For office use, the choice comes down to its low-profile, flat design versus the Magcore65 Lite's larger layout and angle options.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker Magcore65 Lite

  • The Magcore65 Lite supports 8K polling over wired connection, compared with the Luma40's 1000 Hz.
  • Its vendor listing describes inductive analog keys and SOCD, DKS, and Mod Tap functions.
  • Its 65% layout retains arrow keys, while the Luma40's 40% layout has no dedicated arrow keys.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Epomaker Luma40

5.0

3 owner reviews

Praise
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Sajad m.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Epomaker Magcore65 Lite

4.8

10 owner reviews

Praise
“I’ve owned at least two inductive keyboards, each costing more than twice the price of the Magcore65, but none of them sound or feel as good, so I’m sticking with this one.”
Leo B.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

Epomaker Luma40 vs Magcore65 Lite specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

17 of 26 specs differ

Epomaker Luma40

Epomaker Magcore65 Lite

Typing & switches

Switch options

Clicky, Linear
Linear, Magnetic

Hall effect (magnetic)

No
Yes

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Tray Mount
Gasket Mount

Low profile

Yes
No

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

40%
65%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Ortholinear
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
8,000 HzBetter

Battery

1,450 mAh
4,000 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
No

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS

Plate material

Polycarbonate
FR4

Keycaps

PC
PBT, PC

Weight

410 g
750 g

Dimensions

21 x 240 x 87 mm
43 x 324 x 118 mm

Typing angle

—
6°

Backlight

RGB, north-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

QMK

Yes
No

VIA

Yes
No

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2025

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker Luma40 vs Magcore65 Lite: your questions

The Magcore65 Lite is the stronger fit for gaming features, with 8K wired polling, inductive analog switches, and SOCD, DKS, and Mod Tap functions. The Luma40 has 1000 Hz polling and a 40% layout without dedicated arrow keys.

The Luma40 is listed at up to 1000 Hz in wired or 2.4 GHz mode. Its vendor description specifies 125 Hz in Bluetooth mode.

No, its 8K polling rate is specified for wired mode. The vendor lists 1K polling in 2.4 GHz mode and 125 Hz in Bluetooth mode.

No. The Luma40's sockets are for low-profile switches, so standard MX switches will not fit.

No, the Magcore65 Lite accepts inductive switches only and is not compatible with standard MX switches. Its hot-swap feature does not mean it accepts ordinary mechanical or magnetic switch types.

Yes, the Luma40 lists both QMK and VIA support. Its vendor description says VIA can be used for macros, remaps, and layouts.

Yes, its 65% layout retains essential arrow keys, according to the vendor description. It does not have a function row or numpad.

The Luma40 is lighter and smaller, weighing 410g and measuring 240 x 87 mm. The Magcore65 Lite weighs 750g and measures 324 x 118 mm.

The Luma40 requires low-profile keycaps, and its north-facing LEDs can interfere with Cherry-profile keycaps. Standard MX keycaps will not fit its low-profile sockets.

The Magcore65 Lite has south-facing LEDs, which can leave shine-through legends dark. The compatibility notes also warn that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.

The Magcore65 Lite has a 4000mAh battery, while the Luma40 has a 1450mAh battery. The Luma40 vendor description also states up to 75 hours with RGB off, but that figure should not be applied to the Magcore65 Lite.

Yes, both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired connectivity. Their wireless polling rates differ: the Luma40 vendor lists 125 Hz over Bluetooth and up to 1000 Hz in 2.4 GHz mode, while the Magcore65 Lite lists 125 Hz over Bluetooth and 1K in 2.4 GHz mode.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.