Epomaker Split70 vs Azio FOQO ProSplit vs Aluminum
Choose the Split70 for a split ergonomic layout and QMK/VIA support, or the FOQO Pro for an aluminum build and a multi-mode control knob.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.0 (15)4.0 · 15 reviews
from$98at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
No reviews
from$129at Azio
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Split70
Split
- Split ergonomic design with two independent halves for shoulder-width positioning.
- Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity, with a 3000mAh battery.
- QMK and VIA support, hot-swappable PCB, and compatibility with most 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Azio FOQO Pro
Aluminum
- Aluminum case and plate, with a leather-textured body described by Azio.
- Control knob with multimedia, backlight, and macro modes, plus five assignable button functions.
- Hot-swappable design that Azio says is compatible with MX switches.
Pick the Epomaker Split70 if split ergonomics, three connection options, and QMK/VIA support matter most. Choose the Azio FOQO Pro if you prefer an aluminum case and want a control knob with dedicated modes and assignable shortcuts. For regular carrying, the Split70's lower listed weight is a practical differentiator.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Split70
Azio FOQO Pro
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, Wired
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Battery
3,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Ergonomics
Split
Standard
Case material
ABS
Aluminum
Weight
890 g
1,300 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- Epomaker Split70
- Azio FOQO Pro
- Performance
- 7873
- Build quality
- 7862
- Productivity
- 9367
- Customizability
- 9171
- Portability
- 8858
- Hot-swappable
- Knob
What will you mostly use it for?
The Split70 is the more feature-focused choice for gaming, office work, programming, travel, and switch or firmware customization. Its defining advantages are the split format, lighter listed weight, tri-mode connections, and QMK/VIA support. The FOQO Pro stands out for content workflows that benefit from its dedicated knob modes and assignable buttons. Both are hot-swappable, but their layouts and control features lead to different strengths.
Pick the Epomaker Split70
- The Split70 has linear switches and a listed 1000 Hz polling rate.
- Its 2.4 GHz and wired modes are listed at 1000 Hz, while Bluetooth is listed at 125 Hz.
- The FOQO Pro uses tactile Gateron Brown switches and specifies NKRO over USB, but 6-key rollover over Bluetooth.
Epomaker Split70 vs Azio FOQO Pro specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 25 specs differ
Epomaker Split70
Azio FOQO Pro
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
Epomaker Split70 vs Azio FOQO Pro: your questions
Yes. It has two independent keyboard halves that Epomaker says can be positioned at shoulder width. The FOQO Pro has a conventional, non-split layout.
The Split70's product listing includes both QMK and VIA support. The FOQO Pro's listed features do not identify either option.
The Split70 lists Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired USB-C connections. The FOQO Pro lists Bluetooth and wired USB connections.
The Split70 lists linear switches and 1000 Hz polling in wired and 2.4 GHz modes. The FOQO Pro uses tactile Gateron Brown switches, and Azio specifies NKRO over USB but 6-key rollover over Bluetooth.
The Split70 weighs 890 g, while the FOQO Pro weighs 1300 g. The Split70 also lists Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless connections for use without a wired connection.
Yes, both are listed as hot-swappable. Epomaker says the Split70 supports most 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches, while Azio describes the FOQO Pro as compatible with MX switches.
Azio lists multimedia, backlight, and macro modes for the FOQO Pro's control knob. The vendor also says shortcuts can be assigned to its five buttons.
The FOQO Pro has a listed 4000mAh battery, compared with 3000mAh in the Split70. Epomaker lists up to 11 hours with backlighting on and up to 260 hours with it off for the Split70.
Yes, the Split70 has south-facing per-key RGB. Its compatibility note warns that shine-through legends stay dark and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
The FOQO Pro lists aluminum for both its case and plate, and Azio describes its body as leather-textured. The Split70 uses an ABS case and a polycarbonate plate.
Both listings identify an ANSI layout standard. The Split70 is ergonomic and split, while the FOQO Pro is listed with a normal layout.
The Split70 has a gasket mount and five sound-dampening layers, including latex, an IXPE switch pad, PET sound film, a bottom sponge, and bottom silicone. Azio's FOQO Pro description does not list comparable sound-dampening layers.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.