Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 21, 2026

Epomaker TH108 vs AULA F108Battery Life vs Lighter Build Comparison

Choose the TH108 for its longer battery life and adjustable typing angles, or the F108 for a lighter build and potentially lower latency in wireless mode.

EPOMAKER TH108

Battery Life

Epomaker TH108

4.6 · 47 reviews

from$88at Epomaker

Shop nowSee all prices
EPOMAKER x AULA F108

Lighter Build Comparison

AULA F108

5.0 · 14 reviews

from$89at Epomaker

Shop nowSee all prices

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker TH108

Battery Life

If you want

  • Larger 8000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
  • Offers a silent linear switch option (Sea Salt Silent) for quiet typing.
  • Includes a 2-in-1 keycap/switch puller and two extra switches in the box.

And can live with

  • Heavier at 1200g, which is less portable.
  • Uses plate-mounted stabilizers that the manufacturer states are not compatible with PCB or screw-in types.
  • The listed battery capacity differs between the metadata (8000mAh) and vendor page (10000mAh).

Get the

AULA F108

Lighter Build Comparison

If you want

  • Lighter weight at 1000g, making it slightly more manageable.
  • Uses a polycarbonate (PC) plate, which may offer a different typing feel.
  • Vendor-listed 2.4GHz wireless latency is 8ms, potentially a spec for competitive users.

And can live with

  • Smaller 4000mAh battery capacity.
  • The included accessories are more basic, listing only a keycap puller (no switch puller or extra switches mentioned).
  • No silent switch option is listed in the provided specifications.

Bottom line

Your choice depends on prioritizing battery life or weight. The Epomaker TH108 is the better all-rounder for stationary use, offering superior battery life, more accessories, and ergonomic adjustability. The Epomaker F108 is the leaner option, trading battery capacity for a lighter build and a polycarbonate plate, suitable if you value a slightly less hefty keyboard on your desk.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker TH108

AULA F108

  • Switch options

    Linear, Silent

    Linear

  • Weight

    1,200 g

    1,000 g

  • Plate material

    Plastic

    Polycarbonate

  • Released

    2025

    2026

  • Dimensions

    42 x 140 x 445 mm

    33 x 443 x 136 mm

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker TH108
  • AULA F108
Performance
75
75
Build quality
60
60
Productivity
77
76
Customizability
59
58
Portability
63
63

What they share

  • Layout size: 100%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Battery: 8,000 mAh
  • Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
  • Case material: ABS
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The TH108 holds advantages for office and content creation due to its silent switch option, larger battery, and adjustable ergonomics. The F108 is the better choice for travel solely based on its lower weight. For gaming, programming, and modding, the keyboards are effectively tied, sharing nearly identical core specs like polling rate, layout, and hot-swap capability.

For gaming

It's a tie

  • Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4GHz modes for responsive input.
  • Both feature N-key rollover and low latency modes suitable for gaming.
  • The F108 lists an 8ms latency in 2.4GHz mode, while the TH108 lists 5ms, but both are in a competitive range.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Epomaker TH108

4.6

47 owner reviews

Praise
“My first mechanical keyboard. A lot of people like the clack of some keyboards. I prefer the silent switches. This keyboard is great and works very well.”
Sean C.Verified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“Its very cool, I just wish I had picked the silent switch version instead. :/”
Daniel D.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

AULA F108

5.0

14 owner reviews

Praise
“The title describes itself, it sounds amazing, it has a great battery length, the keys feel amazing, I love the size and it's great for my work as a programmer. Would recommend, 10/10.”
Jan L.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

Epomaker TH108 vs AULA F108 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

5 of 22 specs differ

Epomaker TH108

AULA F108

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear, Silent
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

100%
100%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
1,000 Hz

Battery

8,000 mAh
8,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

ABS
ABS

Plate material

Plastic
Polycarbonate

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

1,200 g
1,000 g

Dimensions

42 x 140 x 445 mm
33 x 443 x 136 mm

Typing angle

8°
—

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2026

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

  • EpomakerUS

    In stock
    $88Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit
AULA F1082 stores
  • EpomakerUS

    In stock
    $89Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

FAQ

Epomaker TH108 vs AULA F108: your questions

The primary differences are battery capacity and weight. The TH108 has an 8000mAh battery and weighs 1200g, while the F108 has a 4000mAh battery and weighs 1000g. The TH108 also offers adjustable typing angles and a silent switch option.

Based on the provided specifications, the Epomaker TH108 has a larger battery capacity at 8000mAh compared to the F108's 4000mAh. This suggests the TH108 will last longer on a single charge during wireless use, though actual runtime depends on usage patterns like RGB brightness.

Yes, both the TH108 and F108 feature hot-swappable PCBs. The TH108 is compatible with 5-pin mechanical switches, and the F108 is compatible with both 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches, allowing for easy switch customization.

Yes, both the Epomaker TH108 and F108 list Mac and Windows support in their extra features. The F108 vendor description also explicitly lists Android compatibility.

Both keyboards use a multi-layer gasket-mounted design for sound dampening. The TH108 vendor description lists five layers: PORON sandwich foam, IXPE switch pad, Sound-Enhancement PET, PORON switch socket foam, and bottom silicone. The F108 uses similar PO foams, a PET pad, and bottom silicone.

The Epomaker TH108 has a potential advantage for quiet use as it offers a 'Silent' switch type option called Sea Salt Silent switches. The F108 specifications only list a linear switch type without a silent variant mentioned.

Both keyboards use plate-mounted stabilizers. The TH108 vendor description specifically states it is not compatible with PCB or screw-in stabilizers. This may limit stabilizer modding options compared to keyboards designed for screw-in stabilizers.

Both the Epomaker TH108 and F108 offer a 1000Hz polling rate in their wired and 2.4GHz wireless modes, which is standard for gaming peripherals. Their Bluetooth mode operates at a lower 125Hz polling rate.

According to its vendor page, the TH108 comes with the keyboard, a wireless 2.4GHz receiver, a USB A to C cable, a 2-in-1 keycap-and-switch puller, two extra switches, and a manual.

The F108 vendor description lists the included accessories as the keyboard, a USB cable, a user manual, and a keycap puller. A switch puller or extra switches are not mentioned.

Yes, both keyboards have downloadable software mentioned on their vendor pages. The TH108 has a web-based driver for remapping and macros, and the F108 has dedicated software for key remapping and macro assignment.

The vendor-provided specifications list different latencies for 2.4GHz mode. The TH108 lists 5ms, while the F108 lists 8ms. In wired mode, both list a 2ms latency. For most users, both values are sufficiently low for responsive typing and gaming.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.