Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 7, 2026

Epomaker TH87 vs Redragon GAREN K656 ProBattery Life vs Layout

Choose the Epomaker TH87 for superior wireless endurance and a premium typing feel, or the Redragon GAREN K656 Pro for a more compact layout at a lower price.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Battery Life

Epomaker TH87

EPOMAKER TH87

4.7 (16)

$60at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker TH87

Battery Life

Build quality in the bottom 45% of 80% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Massive 10000mAh battery for exceptional wireless endurance.
  • Gasket mount structure with a detailed 5-layer sound dampening system.
  • Supports multiple international layout standards (ANSI, ISO-DE, ISO-UK, JIS).

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No numpad.

Get the

Redragon GAREN K656 Pro

Layout

If you want

  • More compact 90% layout retains the number pad while saving space.
  • Lighter weight of 800g and slightly slimmer dimensions.
  • Features a visible 4000mAh battery with a dedicated level check shortcut.

Rules this board out

  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.

Bottom line

Your priority should guide this choice. If you value not having to charge your keyboard for weeks and want a softer, more cushioned typing experience from a gasket mount, the Epomaker TH87 is the clear winner. If your budget is tighter, you need the number pad in a smaller form factor, and you prefer a lighter keyboard, the Redragon GAREN K656 Pro is a compelling alternative, though you'll trade significant battery life and the gasket mount feel.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker TH87

Redragon GAREN K656 Pro

  • Layout size

    80%

    90%

  • Battery

    10,000 mAh

    3,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Case material

    ABS

    Plastic

  • Switch options

    Linear, Silent

    Linear

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    Bottom Mount

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker TH87
  • Redragon GAREN K656 Pro
Performance
74
76
Build quality
59
53
Productivity
75
63
Customizability
58
55
Portability
85
51

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Sound dampening
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Epomaker TH87 is the stronger choice for gaming, office use, and modding, largely due to its high-capacity battery, silent switch options, and gasket-mounted construction. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro wins for travel and programming, where its lighter weight, more compact 90% layout, and integrated numpad are advantageous. For content creation, both are equally capable, offering the core features needed for a personalized and connected setup.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker TH87

  • The TH87 specifies a 1000Hz polling rate in its 2.4GHz and wired modes for faster response.
  • Its vendor page lists specific low latency figures of 2ms (wired) and 5ms (2.4GHz).
  • The gasket mount and multi-layer foam system may provide a more cushioned feel during long sessions.

Full specs

Epomaker TH87 vs Redragon GAREN K656 Pro specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

10 of 22 specs differ

Epomaker TH87

Redragon GAREN K656 Pro

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear, Silent
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Bottom Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

80%
90%

Layout standard

ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE, ISO-UK, JIS
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

10,000 mAhBetter
3,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

ABS
Plastic

Plate material

Polycarbonate
—

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

1,000 g
800 g

Dimensions

41 x 367 x 142 mm
35 x 358 x 107 mm

Typing angle

6°
—

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
No

Extras

Released

2025
2025

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

Epomaker TH87

  • Epomaker

    ISO-DE, ISO-UK

    In stockShips to you

Redragon GAREN K656 Pro

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker TH87 vs Redragon GAREN K656 Pro: your questions

The Epomaker TH87 has a significantly larger 10000mAh battery compared to the Redragon GAREN K656 Pro's 4000mAh. According to Epomaker's listing, this provides up to 45 hours with RGB on or 200 hours with it off. The GAREN K656 Pro does not list specific runtime estimates.

Yes, both keyboards list Mac support in their extra features. The Epomaker TH87 vendor page explicitly states compatibility with Mac, Windows, and Android devices. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro also includes Mac/Win support in its listed features.

Yes, both the Epomaker TH87 and Redragon GAREN K656 Pro feature hot-swappable PCBs. The Redragon's vendor description specifically mentions its socket is compatible with nearly all 3-pin and 5-pin switches. Both keyboards include switch pullers in the box.

The Epomaker TH87 uses a gasket mount, where the plate is suspended on rubber gaskets for a softer, more flexible typing feel. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro uses a bottom mount, where the plate is screwed directly into the case bottom, typically resulting in a firmer and more rigid feel.

The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro has a more compact depth of 107mm and height of 35mm compared to the Epomaker TH87's 142mm depth and unspecified height (with a front height of 18.5mm). The GAREN's 90% layout also integrates a number pad into a smaller form factor than a traditional full-size board.

The Epomaker TH87 vendor page mentions programmable software for Windows to assign macros and remap keys. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro listing includes 'Pro Software Supported' as a feature, but no details are provided on its capabilities or cross-platform support.

The Epomaker TH87 uses a 5-layer system including PORON sandwich foam, IXPE switch pad, and a silicone bottom. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro uses three layers: 3.5mm PO foam, IXPE switch foam, and a PET sound pad. Both are designed to reduce hollow noises and metallic pings.

Yes, both keyboards come with PBT keycaps, which are more resistant to shine and wear than ABS plastic. The Epomaker TH87 uses double-shot Cherry profile keycaps, while the Redragon GAREN K656 Pro uses PBT round keycaps.

The Epomaker TH87 is the better choice for a quiet office. It offers silent linear switch options, such as the Sea Salt Silent V2 switch, which are specifically designed to reduce noise. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro, according to the provided data, only lists linear switch types without a silent variant.

The Epomaker TH87 includes the keyboard, a USB A-to-C cable, a 2.4GHz receiver, two extra switches, a 2-in-1 puller, and a manual. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro includes the keyboard, a detachable USB-C cable, a switch puller, a keycap puller, spare switches, and a user manual.

Yes, the Redragon GAREN K656 Pro vendor description states you can check the battery level by pressing FN + F1. This works with its visible 4000mAh battery. The Epomaker TH87 does not mention a specific battery level check shortcut in the provided information.

The Epomaker TH87 specifies a 1000Hz polling rate in both its wired and 2.4GHz wireless modes. The Redragon GAREN K656 Pro's vendor description does not provide a specific polling rate, so its performance in this regard cannot be confirmed from the available data.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.