Jamesdonkey R2 Pro vs Qwertykeys QK101
Choose the QK101 for ISO support, dual mounting, and 4000 Hz polling, or the R2 Pro if you want its metallic knob and vendor-described assembled option.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
No reviews
from$159at Mechkeys
5.0 (2)5.0 · 2 reviews
from$188at Divinikey
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Jamesdonkey R2 Pro
Knob
- 95% layout with a listed weight of 2205 g.
- CNC-machined aluminum case and gasket construction, with IXPE, PORON, and silicone padding described by the vendor.
- Vendor describes a customizable display and multi-function metallic knob.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Get the
Qwertykeys QK101
Battery
Build quality in the top 5% of 100% boards under $200.
- Supports ANSI and ISO layouts in a full-size format.
- Aluminum and copper case materials are listed, with FR4 and aluminum plate options.
- Supports both gasket and top-mount assembly.
Choose the QK101 if you need ISO support, want to select between gasket and top mounting, or prioritize its listed 4000 Hz polling rate. Pick the R2 Pro if the metallic knob and its vendor-described fully assembled option matter more than those differences. Before ordering the QK101, check the specific listing carefully, as its vendor description identifies it as a barebones kit without switches or keycaps.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Jamesdonkey R2 Pro
Qwertykeys QK101
Layout size
95%
100%
Battery
6,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Case material
Aluminum
Aluminum, Copper
Mount style
Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount, Top Mount
Knob
Yes
No
- Jamesdonkey R2 Pro
- Qwertykeys QK101
- Performance
- 5278
- Build quality
- 6891
- Productivity
- 7482
- Customizability
- 8285
- Portability
- 6363
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The QK101 has the edge for gaming, office work, programming, and modding, particularly for buyers who value its polling-rate listing, ISO support, VIA, or assembly options. The R2 Pro is the more travel-oriented pick of these two based on its smaller listed layout and lower listed weight. Its metallic knob makes it a better fit for buyers who want that dedicated control on a content-creation desk. Both offer wireless modes, screens, RGB, and hot-swappable sockets.
Pick the Qwertykeys QK101
- The QK101 lists a 4000 Hz polling rate, while the R2 Pro has no polling rate listed.
- Both offer wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity.
- The QK101 offers a 1.2 mm flex-cut PCB option with RGB or a 1.6 mm non-flex-cut option without RGB.
Jamesdonkey R2 Pro vs Qwertykeys QK101 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 24 specs differ
Jamesdonkey R2 Pro
Qwertykeys QK101
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
Mac & Windows
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Jamesdonkey R2 Pro
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Qwertykeys QK101
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
Jamesdonkey R2 Pro vs Qwertykeys QK101: your questions
No. The R2 Pro is listed as ANSI, and its compatibility rule says ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered. The QK101 supports ANSI and ISO layouts.
Yes. The QK101 is listed for ANSI and ISO, and its vendor description says both PCB options support those physical layouts. The R2 Pro is ANSI-only.
The QK101 lists a 4000 Hz polling rate. No polling-rate figure is listed for the Jamesdonkey R2 Pro, so this spec alone does not establish a direct comparison.
The QK101 is listed at 2000 g, while the R2 Pro is listed at 2205 g. Both are substantial keyboards, and the QK101 is also full-size while the R2 Pro is listed as 95%.
Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless connectivity, as well as wired use. The QK101 vendor description specifies USB-C for its wired connection.
Yes. The R2 Pro is listed with knob support, and its vendor description specifically identifies a multi-function metallic knob. The vendor says the knob can also be used to enter the screen menu with the Fn key.
Yes. QK's vendor description says the keyboard is programmable through its custom VIA web configurator. The R2 Pro's listed features do not identify VIA support.
The vendor listing describes the QK101 as a barebones DIY kit and says it does not include switches or keycaps. Check the exact package listing before buying, especially if you expect an assembled keyboard.
Both are listed as hot-swappable. The R2 Pro vendor description specifies full-key sockets supporting 3-pin and 5-pin switches, while QK's description confirms hot-swap support.
The QK101 supports gasket and top-mount assembly. Its vendor listing also describes four plate options, so buyers can choose among listed build components.
The R2 Pro lists a 6000 mAh battery, and the QK101 lists an 8000 mAh battery. QK's vendor description specifies two 4000 mAh batteries; it recommends the non-RGB PCB for better battery performance.
Both list a screen. The R2 Pro vendor describes a customizable display with settings such as indicators and date/time, while QK's listing describes built-in themes and custom background and foreground GIFs that sync with typing speed.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.