AULA F75 vs Jamesdonkey A3 3.0Gaming vs Firmware Choice
Choose the AULA F75 for its gaming-focused rapid trigger feature and lower price, or the Jamesdonkey A3 3.0 for its QMK firmware support and open-ended programmability.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.5 (510)4.5 · 510 reviews
from$42at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
No reviews
from$89at Mechkeys
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Gaming
Build quality in the bottom 35% of 75% boards under $50.
- Includes a rapid trigger feature for gaming, as listed in its specifications.
- Specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate for responsive input.
- Uses screw-in stabilizers, which are often preferred for their stability.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Jamesdonkey A3 3.0
Firmware Choice
Build quality in the bottom 40% of 75% boards under $100.
- Supports QMK firmware for extensive, cross-platform key remapping and macro creation.
- Comes with TTC Iron V2 switches, which the vendor describes as having a light trigger force and self-lubricating design.
- Also features a five-layered sound-absorbing padding for a quieter typing experience.
Your priority should dictate the choice. Gamers who value features like rapid trigger and a confirmed high polling rate should choose the AULA F75. Tinkerers, programmers, and users who want maximum control over their keyboard's behavior through QMK firmware will find more value in the Jamesdonkey A3 3.0. For general use where these specific features are less critical, both are competent wireless 75% keyboards.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Jamesdonkey A3 3.0
Battery
4,000 mAh
3,750 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
QMK
No
Yes
The deep option when you want to remap every key
Keycaps
ABS, PBT
PBT
Screw-in stabilizers
Yes
No
Easier to tune than the plate-mount stabs you get prebuilt
Backlight
RGB, south-facing
RGB
RGB for looks and low light rather than speed
- AULA F75
- Jamesdonkey A3 3.0
- Performance
- 6353
- Build quality
- 6660
- Productivity
- 9380
- Customizability
- 8282
- Portability
- 8376
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 takes a clear lead for gaming due to its rapid trigger feature and confirmed high polling rate. For programming and modding, the Jamesdonkey A3 3.0 is the stronger contender because of its QMK firmware support. For office use, travel, and content creation, the keyboards are evenly matched, sharing core features like wireless connectivity, sound dampening, and a compact layout with a knob.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 lists a rapid trigger feature, which is not mentioned for the Jamesdonkey A3 3.0.
- The AULA F75 has a specified 1000 Hz polling rate, while the A3 3.0's polling rate is not provided.
- The AULA F75 includes screw-in stabilizers, which can contribute to a more stable feel during intense gaming sessions.
AULA F75 vs Jamesdonkey A3 3.0 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 24 specs differ
AULA F75
Jamesdonkey A3 3.0
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
AULA F75 vs Jamesdonkey A3 3.0: your questions
The AULA F75 appears better suited for competitive gaming. Its specifications list a rapid trigger feature and a 1000 Hz polling rate, which are important for minimizing input delay. The Jamesdonkey A3 3.0's vendor page mentions low latency but does not specify a polling rate or list a rapid trigger feature.
Yes, according to its vendor description. The Jamesdonkey A3 3.0's QMK driver software is stated to support multiple systems including Windows, Mac, and Linux. The keyboard itself also lists Mac/Win support in its core features.
The vendor page for the AULA F75 shows a variant with LEOBOG Reaper switches. The product metadata also indicates it offers silent and linear switch types. The keyboard is hot-swappable, so you can easily install other compatible switches.
Yes, its QMK firmware support allows for deep customization. The vendor states the QMK web-based driver enables easy programming for different keys, and even the multimedia knob's function can be customized through the software.
The AULA F75 has a slightly larger 4000mAh battery compared to the Jamesdonkey A3 3.0's 3750mAh battery. In practice, actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, RGB brightness, and connection mode.
No. The AULA F75 uses Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps. The Jamesdonkey A3 3.0 uses OEM-height PBT keycaps. Cherry profile is typically lower than OEM, which can affect typing feel and ergonomics.
The AULA F75 has a mixed implementation. Its vendor description notes that side-printed keycap versions have south-facing LEDs, while other versions have north-facing LEDs. The Jamesdonkey A3 3.0's LED orientation is not specified in the provided information.
According to the vendor's download section, the software for the AULA F75 is listed as only supporting the Windows system. For basic functionality like wireless connectivity and media controls, it will work on Mac without software.
The vendor listing includes the keyboard, a 2.4G dongle, a Type-C cable, a 2-in-1 keycap/switch puller, and a user manual. The Jamesdonkey A3 3.0's included accessories are not detailed in the provided description.
Both are good starting points as they are hot-swappable and pre-built with sound-dampening foam. The Jamesdonkey A3 3.0 might be more appealing for firmware modding due to QMK. The AULA F75 offers a detailed internal foam structure and screw-in stabilizers for physical modders.
The AULA F75 specifically lists screw-in stabilizers in its features, which are generally considered more secure than clip-in variants. The type of stabilizers on the Jamesdonkey A3 3.0 is not mentioned in the provided specifications.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.